Al-Jazeerah History  
	 
	
	
	Archives  
	 
	
	
	
	
	Mission & Name   
	 
	
	
	
	
	Conflict Terminology   
	 
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	
	
	Gaza Holocaust   
	 
	
	
	Gulf War   
	 
	
	Isdood  
	 
	
	
	Islam   
	 
	
	
	News   
	 
	
	
	News Photos 
	  
	 
	
	
	Opinion  
	
	
	Editorials 
	  
	 
	
	
	
	
	US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)   
	 
	
	
	www.aljazeerah.info
	  
      
       
      
        
        
     | 
     | 
    
    
        
			
				 
		The Struggle for Palestinian Rights: Then and Now  
				By James J 
				Zogby 
		Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, 
		August 9, 2018  
				 | 
				
			    | 
			 
		 
		
			
				
				  | 
				
				  | 
			 
			
				| 
				  | 
				
				  | 
			 
		 
		  Forty years ago this month I left a tenured teaching position 
		and moved to Washington, DC to run the Palestine Human Rights Campaign 
		(PHRC). It wasn't easy doing Palestine work back then, and Washington 
		was an especially inhospitable city in which to pursue my new vocation.  
		 Advocating for Palestinian rights can still be difficult, but so 
		much has changed in the past four decades that I thought it might be 
		useful to reflect on where we were in the 1970's and where we are 
		today. 
  Back then, major pro-Israel and establishment American 
		Jewish organizations threw their full weight behind the effort to 
		marginalize our work. They denounced and defamed us as supporters of 
		terrorism—a disgraceful effort to silence and isolate us because we 
		defended Palestinian rights—including the right to self-determination. 
		The language they used was so harsh and the charges they leveled against 
		us were so inflammatory that they took a toll. We received death 
		threats, hate mail, culminating in violent attacks and even murder.  
		 Their campaign to make "Palestine" taboo also negatively impacted 
		our ability to build alliances. A few hardy Members of Congress 
		supported our defense of Palestinian victims—of torture, Administrative 
		Detention, collective punishment, or illegal expulsion from their 
		homeland. Most Members, however, even those with stellar human rights 
		records, begged off by citing their fear that if they were to defend 
		Palestinians it might damage their political careers.  
  At one 
		point, we even stopped testifying before Congressional committees since 
		they proved to be largely frustrating and unproductive affairs. Instead 
		of being allowed to make our case, our appearances only provided 
		pro-Israel Members of Congress with the opportunity to badger and insult 
		us with patently false scripted attacks ("Isn't it true that you are 
		supporting terrorists?" and other such nonsense). 
  Even 
		progressive foreign policy groups were intimidated. On two occasions we 
		were disinvited from membership in a major left-leaning foreign policy 
		coalition despite having won admission with an overwhelmingly favorable 
		vote. The reasons given for asking us to withdraw were that a few Jewish 
		groups threatened to leave the coalition if were to join, creating the 
		concern that the coalition might lose support from liberal Members of 
		Congress and financial assistance from liberal donors. 
  It wasn't 
		all gloom and doom. Despite struggling against great odds, we did win 
		some support for our work. A few principled Christian denominations 
		provided assistance, as did most of the civil rights leaders who had 
		been in Dr. Martin Luther King's circle. Major peace activists noted for 
		their leadership in the anti-Vietnam war movement also participated in 
		our campaigns and programs. Strengthened by this support, we weathered 
		storms and continued to grow. 
  Several developments occurring 
		between the late 1970's and the early 1990's contributed to improving 
		our ability to advocate on behalf of Palestinian rights. The first of 
		these were the public releases of two detailed indictments of Israeli 
		torture—the Washington Post's publication of the US Jerusalem Consulate 
		cables that documented Israel's systematic use of torture as a way of 
		forcing prisoners to confess to crimes they did not commit, and the 
		London Times' exhaustive study of Israeli torture of Palestinian 
		prisoners. In the wake of these shockingly disturbing reports, it became 
		difficult for some human rights leaders to remain silent.  
  In 
		1979, there was the "Andrew Young Affair" in which it was revealed that 
		Young, then the US Ambassador to the UN, had met with the PLO's UN 
		representative. In doing so he had broken the taboo that prohibited US 
		officials from having any contact with the PLO. Young lost his job, but 
		African Americans were outraged, leading many respected civil rights 
		leaders to trek to Beirut to meet directly with Yasir Arafat in a direct 
		challenge to the lunacy of the "no talk policy". On their return, these 
		same leaders joined our PHRC. 
  During the 1980's, many Americans 
		were horrified by Israel's especially brutal and senseless bombardment 
		of and occupation of Beirut, and the excessively cruel and violent 
		tactics Israel used to squash the first Intifada—in which stone-throwing 
		Palestinian youths confronted heavily armed Israeli occupation forces. 
		They were shocked by the scenes they saw and reports they read and 
		became more sympathetic to Palestinians and came to support our work.  
		  Two other events, during this period also served to catapult the 
		Palestinian cause to a front and center position in American 
		consciousness and politics. The 1988 Jesse Jackson presidential campaign 
		mobilized Arab Americans, progressive Jews, African Americans, and peace 
		activists in support of Palestinian rights and "two-state solution" to 
		the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Building on Jackson's leadership and 
		the growing awareness of the plight of the Palestinians, we were able to 
		pass pro-Palestinian planks in 10 state Democratic Party platforms and 
		have the first-ever floor demonstration and debate on Palestinian rights 
		at the Democratic National Convention. 
  The Oslo Accords of 1993 
		contributed to significantly altering the US landscape changing the 
		situation from Jews versus Arabs to those who supported a just peace 
		versus those who did not. Despite Oslo's weaknesses, it opened the door 
		to a discussion on Palestinian rights and gave legitimacy to 
		pro-Palestinian advocates who had been long been shunned for their 
		work.        It was these developments from this earlier period 
		that helped shape the political environment in which we are now 
		operating. But it didn't end there. Contributing to even greater change 
		are several new factors that must be considered. First and foremost is 
		the growing demographic and partisan divide over Israeli behavior toward 
		Palestinians. Millennials, African Americans and other "minority" 
		communities have been shocked by the crude and heavy-handed policies of 
		an increasingly hardline and overtly racist Israeli government. Further 
		exacerbating the divide is the way Israel and Trump (and his 
		conservative and right-wing Christian allies) appear to be locked in an 
		embrace. This right-wing pairing has been matched by the alliance that 
		has brought together the growing movement of young progressive Jews, 
		Arab Americans, and African Americans. This latter coalition found 
		expression first in the Bernie Sanders campaign and now in several other 
		political campaigns and pro-Palestinian initiatives on college campuses 
		and even a few notable efforts in Congress.  
  In several 
		significant ways the Palestinian reality, whether under occupation or in 
		exile has worsened in recent years, taking a horrific toll on both 
		Palestinian lives and aspirations. While US politicians may now feel 
		comfortable mouthing support for a "two-state solution", it is difficult 
		to imagine how such a solution can be implemented. It is even more 
		unlikely that some of the same elected officials who say they support 
		two states would consider taking the tough positions to force Israel to 
		end the occupation in order to allow a viable Palestinian state to come 
		into being. Their profession of support for two states, therefore, 
		appears to be hollow and designed more to side-step their responsibility 
		to address Israel's abuse of Palestinian human rights and justice.  
		 Nevertheless, I remain more optimistic than I was forty years ago. 
		The developments that have occurred have had a profound impact. The 
		situation may be more difficult, but the movement for Palestinian rights 
		is stronger, larger, more diverse, and more deeply committed to justice. 
		There is new energy and new hope that we are turning a corner in our 
		ability to secure justice for Palestinians. Disclaimer: The views and 
		opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not 
		necessarily reflect the position of the Arab American Institute. The 
		Arab American Institute is a non-profit, nonpartisan national leadership 
		organization that does not endorse candidates. 
		*** 
		
		 
		Share the link of this article with your facebook friends
		
		
     
      
       
        | 
     | 
     
      
      
      
      
     |