Al-Jazeerah History  
	 
	
	
	Archives  
	 
	
	
	
	
	Mission & Name   
	 
	
	
	
	
	Conflict Terminology   
	 
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	
	
	Gaza Holocaust   
	 
	
	
	Gulf War   
	 
	
	Isdood  
	 
	
	
	Islam   
	 
	
	
	News   
	 
	
	
	News Photos 
	  
	 
	
	
	Opinion  
	
	
	Editorials 
	  
	 
	
	
	
	
	US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)   
	 
	
	
	www.aljazeerah.info
	  
      
       
      
        
        
     | 
     | 
    
    
  
	Renouncing Jewishness: Shlomo Sand and Gilad 
	Atzmon 
  By
	Eric Walberg 
	
  
			   
  Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, August 2, 2016
  
	 
      
		  
			  
			    | 
			  
			    | 
			  
			    | 
		   
		  
			  | Shlomo Sand launching 'How I 
			  Stopped Being a Jew' | 
			    | 
			    | 
		   
	 
	 
	For years now, I've known there was something wrong when my well-meaning 
	anti-Zionist Jewish friends found it necessary to join Jewish anti-Zionist 
	groups opposing Israel. In the US, Jewish Voice for Peace, in Canada, Not in 
	Our Name; in Britain, Jews Against Zionism -- every country has its group, 
	usually more than one. "I am a Jewish witness against Israel," I would be 
	told. Sounds good, even brave. Sand's latest deconstruction of Jewishness 
	and Israel, How I Stopped Being a Jew (2014), makes it clear why my 
	suspicions were well founded.
  Barely 100 pages, it is a page-turner, 
	a precis of his earlier more scholarly works, arguing that the romantic, 
	heroic age of Jewish nationalism, as embodied in the creation of a Jewish 
	state, is coming to an end. Israel will not disappear, but it is an 
	anachronism, an embarrassment in the postmodern age. A reminder of the 
	horrors of Nazism, but not as the Zionist crafters of the "holocaust 
	industry", or "holocaust religion", would have it. The Zionist project is 
	exposed by Norman Finkelstein, Noam Chomsky, Gilad Atzmon, Israel Shamir and 
	many more Jewish critics as reenacting the same policies of yesteryear. A 
	flawed answer that is doomed, "an 
	insidious form of racism".  
  For the Israeli Sand, the 
	Jewish "national" identity is a fraud (an Israeli identity is fine); the 
	only viable Jewish identity is a religious one, and as a nonbeliever, he 
	logically concludes,  "Cogito, ergo non sum." 
  Gilad Atzmon 
	takes Sand's logic further. He tore up his Israeli passport, becoming an 
	ex-Israeli as well as an ex-Jew. 
  What's so wrong with a secular, 
	ethnic Jewish identity? Well, it can be based on only one of two things: 
	persecution (being "forced" into being a Jew whether one likes it or not, as 
	in the Nazi's racial laws) or being "born" into the Jewish people. The 
	former is no longer an issue and the latter is full of holes, and based on a 
	dangerous myth.
  When was the Jewish People invented? 
	 Sand's answer is simple: "At a certain stage in the 19th century, 
	intellectuals of Jewish origin in Germany, influenced by the folk character 
	of German nationalism, took upon themselves the task of inventing a people 
	'retrospectively', out of a thirst to create a modern Jewish people." For 
	Jews, this required a homeland, and the westernized Jewish elite were able 
	to provide this. As the West suffered one mortal blow after another 
	(WWI&II), Zionism took on a new meaning. Voila! Israel.
  But the exile 
	legend is a myth. Sand is a historian and couldn't find any texts supporting 
	it. The Romans did not exile peoples. "Judaic society was not dispersed and 
	was not exiled." Jews continued to live in the Holy Land through thick and 
	thin, freer under Muslim rule than Christian, but even the latter never 
	"ethnically cleansed" them. Most converted to Christianity or Islam. Voila! 
	The (Christian, Muslim) Palestinians. However, a tiny core stuck stubbornly 
	to the original monotheism, nurtured by the Babylonian exile in the 6th 
	century BC (the only bona fide exile--from which they returned, the earlier 
	Egyptian exile legend being crafted much later, when the Torah was written 
	down and collected in the 3rd century BC).
  Jews are not a race but 
	rather a collective of many ethnic groups who were hijacked by a late 19th 
	century 'national' movement. There is no racial or ethnic basis for being 
	Jewish any more than there is for being Christian or Muslim. The great 
	majority of those who today consider themselves Jewish are descended from 
	converts in Central Asia, eastern Europe and north Africa, not from ancient 
	Hebrews expelled from the Holy Land by the Romans. They are not ethnic 
	“Semites”, of near eastern origin, or ethnic anything else. 
  Atzmon 
	is a noted jazz musician, and
	
	deconstructs a popular 1970s Israeli pop song by Shlomo Artzi: All of a 
	sudden a man wakes up in the morning. He feels he is people and to  Scene 
	from Shoval's 'Youth' (2016) everyone he comes across he says shalom. 
	Artzi's youth suggests Jews suddenly became "people" thanks to the state of 
	Israel, conflating being Jewish with being Israeli, suggesting only Israelis 
	can really feel free as Jews. What Artzi ignores is that feeling proud to be 
	an Israeli is only for those Israelis who have "Jew" stamped in their 
	passport, and, among them, only those who are blind to the bloody colonial 
	basis for this privilege. Hardly a recipe for a healthy feeling.
  
	Can a liar tell the truth?
  Israel is a “democratic 
	and Jewish state” according to Israeli law. The "Jewish" nature was first 
	defined in the Declaration of Independence of 1948. The "democratic" 
	character was added by the Knesset in 1985. This is a contradiction in 
	terms, as Jewish by definition determines the state according to race, 
	making it undemocratic for those in the state not Jewish. In cartesian 
	lingo, both 'A' and 'not A' are true.
  This flawed logic now lies at 
	the heart of what it means to call oneself a secular Jew, either Israeli or 
	'diaspora'. Sand joins other ex-Jews, Gilad Atzmon, Israel Shamir, and Will 
	Self, who have renounced Jewishness, either as secularists, or as converts 
	to Christianity, shedding a contradictory, now empty, signifier.  Given 
	what Israel has become, "democratic" and "Jewish" are no longer compatible. 
	Sand rejects the faux Jewish nationalism served up by Zionism, which 
	excludes non-Jews from the narrative, and is left with nothing except 
	himself, his books, his sense of right and wrong. A lonely world.
  
	Atzmon takes Sand's attack on identity politics a step further, arguing in 
	The Wandering Who that secular Jewish anti-Zionism feeds into the Zionist 
	narrative, the do-gooder counterpoint to the more sinister role of the 
	diaspora, taking Sand's concerns to an even more uncomfortable conclusion: 
	The Jewish Diaspora is there to mobilize lobbies by recruiting international 
	support. The Neocons transform the American army into an Israeli mission 
	force. Anti-Zionists of Jewish descent (and this may even include proud 
	self-haters such as myself) are there to portray an image of ideological 
	plurality and ethical concern.* 
  Sand dismisses both religion and 
	nationalism as the basis for his identity. Atzmon argues
	
	both are legitimate, though they both are perverted in the case of the 
	Israeli state. Nationalism is an authentic "bond with one’s soil, heritage, 
	culture, language", a cathartic experience, not at all "empty" as a 
	signifier.  Though nationalism may well be an invention, it is still 
	"an intrinsically authentic fulfilling experience". It can be misused, is 
	often suicidal, but nonetheless, "it sometimes manages to integrate man, 
	soil and sacrifice into a state of spiritual unification."
  What is 
	especially moving about ex-Jews like Sand, and ex-Israel ex-Jews like Atzmon, 
	is that they are trapped by their own Israeli heritage, whether or not they 
	emigrate. Reading Sand's book in Hebrew, writes Atzmon, "is for me, an 
	ex-Jew and ex-Israeli, a truly authentic experience that brings me closer to 
	my roots, my forgotten homeland and its fading landscape, my mother tongue 
	or shall I simply say my Being." He is confronted not by some "‘identity’ or 
	politics but rather the Israeliness, that concrete nationalist discourse 
	that matured into Hebraic poetry, patriotism, ideology, jargon, a dream and 
	a tragedy to follow." Israel's present state has "robbed 
	him of that Israeliness which was once to him a home."  
  
	Hollow identity 
  Most still yearn to keep a diaspora 
	Jewish identity alive. Judith Butler’s Parting Ways: Jewishness and the 
	Critique of  Zionism (2013) is by a liberal-leaning Jew who feels she 
	must salvage her Jewishness from Israel’s nationalism and occupation 
	policies. "A new Jewish identity might emerge that connects Tel Aviv with 
	New York’s Upper West Side, Berlin, Paris, London and Buenos Aires -- and 
	all of them on an equal footing," writes Carlo Strener in his
	
	review.  
  For Sand and Atzmon, there is no "new Jewish 
	identity" possible, because there is no diaspora. French Jews are French. 
	Canadian ones are Canadian. It's fine to be a believing 'person of the 
	Book', and even an Israeli, speaking Israeli (really a new language) and 
	being a citizen of a well-behaved multi-ethnic nation state, based on 
	universal norms, like France or Canada. But everyone eats matzo balls 
	already. 
  Assimilation is not like extermination, despite Golda 
	Meir's 
	cries of "Wolf!" Non-religious Jewishness will continue to evaporate, 
	along with Christian and Muslim identities for those who abandon their 
	faith. There is no shame in calling oneself an ex-Christian or ex-Muslim.
	
  Occam's Razor: less is more
  Anti-Zionists "rightly see 
	[Zionist] policies as threatening the renewal of Judeophobia" that 
	identifies all Jews as a "certain race-people, and confuses them with 
	Zionists.”** Yes, but, as Atzmon argues, this "confusion" is part of the 
	agenda, pushing Jews outside of Israel to support Israel unthinkingly and 
	accept the resultant resentment they experience as "anti-Semitism".
  
	And even if they protest--as Jews--they inadvertently support the "Zionist 
	world conspiracy":
  If those who call themselves anti-Zionist Jews 
	without having lived in Israel, and without knowing its language or having 
	experienced its culture, claim a particular right, different from that of 
	non-Jews, to make accusations against Israel, how can one criticize overt 
	pro-Zionists for granting themselves the privilege of actively intervening 
	in decisions regarding  Codepink's Medea Benjamin the future and fate 
	of Israel?* 
  The Jewish signifier undermines the anti-Zionist one. 
	Slots muddy things. Medea Benjamin, a "one percenter, a nice little Jewish 
	girl" founded the now legendary peace group Codepink. QAIA (Queers against 
	Israeli apartheid) folded when its organizers realized by highlighting their 
	'gay' signifier, they were doing more harm than good. The queers don't have 
	the luxury of renouncing their queerness, but thoughtful Jews like Benjamin 
	similarly downplay their own tribalism, and Sand and Atzmon have renounced 
	it, as the honorable way out of their Catch-22. 
	xxx 
	* Gilad Atzmon, The Wandering Who?, Zero Books, 2011, p70. 
	** Shlomo Sand, How I Stopped being a Jew, Verso, 2014, p94--95. 
	***
  
		  
		  
		  Share this article with your facebook friends 
      
 
   
       | 
     | 
     
      
      
      
      
     |