Mission & Name
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
Listen to Syrians:
The Media Jackals Vs. the People's Narrative
By Ramzy Baroud
Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, October 12, 2015
Imagine the Syrian war from the point of view of
ordinary Syrians from a variety of backgrounds. They are most likely to
offer a different perspective and to hold entirely different expectations
than most other parties involved.
A resident of Idlib, a
villager from Deraa, a housewife, a teacher, a nurse or an unemployed
ex-prisoner from anywhere else in Syria would distinguish their
relationship to the war in terminology and overall understanding that is
partially, or entirely, opposed to the narrative communicated by CNN,
Al-Jazeera, Russia Today, the BBC, Press TV, and every available media
platform that is concerned with the outcomes of the war.
media tailor their coverage and, when necessary - as is often the case -
slant their focus in ways that would communicate their designated
editorial agendas, which, unsurprisingly, is often linked to the larger
political agenda of their respective governments. They may purport to
speak in accordance with some imaginary moral line, but, frankly, none of
Surely, the stories of ordinary Syrians are not
prepared in advance or communicated via press conferences in so
articulate, guarded and predictable a manner. That is a job that has been
reserved for, and perfected by, politicians who represent countries with
palpable vested interests in the war.
But how could a story that
is so thoroughly covered and discussed round the clock in so exhaustive a
fashion be so far removed from the reality at hand?
there is no single truth in explaining the war in Syria, and not even an
unmitigated people’s narrative can change that. The Russians, for example,
justify their latest intervention as needed action to stave off the
progress of Daesh, although the Russians themselves are accused by
everyone else, save Iran, that they are targeting other opposition groups.
The Russians, in turn, accuse everyone else, but Iran, of either
initiating the problem in the first place, empowering or funding Daesh, or
failing to do anything meaningful to bring the war to an end.
If seen from others’ perspective – the Arab (especially Gulf countries),
Turkey, Iran, Hezbollah, Jordan, the United States, European countries, and
so on – every country seems to communicate their understanding of the war,
thus explaining the nature of their involvement by using all sorts of
upright and righteous rationales. It seems as if they are all united by
their love of the Syrian people and the sanctity of their lives.
However, considering that over 300,000 Syrians have been killed in the war
so far, with many more wounded, and six million becoming desolate refugees,
one can be certain of the fact that none of these governments actually care
for Syrian lives, including, sadly, their government and the opposition. To
be less crude, we can be certain that the survival of the Syrian nation is
not a top priority to those who are using Syria as a ground for their proxy
Those who perished in Syria have been victimized by all
warring parties, and the bullets that killed, the shells that devastated
neighborhoods, and the rockets that randomly toppled homes originated from
too many directions to count.
In other words, there should be no
room for polarizing narrative in Syria any more, as in good guys vs. bad
guys; evil regime vs. opposition or terrorists vs. a sovereign government;
or regional forces that are attempting to invite stability and peace vs.
others espousing chaos.
These thoughts, and more, crossed my mind
as I began recording the experiences of Syrian and Palestinian refugees who
managed to cross to Europe via Turkey and Greece. After reading countless
articles about the war, listening to a thousand news broadcasts, consulting
with dozens of ‘experts’, Arab and non-Arab alike, I found the hours I spent
with the refugees far more enriching and informative.
When it was
explained to me, for example, how the Yarmouk siege came about, and after I
crossed referenced the information with other refugees – who may hold a
different political perspective on the war – I found out that our
understanding of what took place in the refugee camp was almost completely
misguided, or rather, politicized - thus slanted, self-serving and generally
Khaled’s journey from Damascus to Idlib, Homs, Hama, all
the way to Qamishli, then to the Turkish border deprives the narrative from
its polarization; he was a target for everyone; indeed, his suffering
continued even when he crossed the Turkish border, took a boat to Lesbos,
attempted to enter Macedonia, then Serbia, and so on. It took him four
months to reach Sweden, with about ten different stops in different jails.
His narrative contained no references to good guys vs. bad guys, in any
collective sense. Any act of kindness he encountered on his journey was
surely a random one, and depended entirely on the goodness of ordinary
people, like himself.
The same sentiment was conveyed through
Maysam’s story, whose peers at the Syrian Red Crescent Society were arrested
and tortured because they treated fighters from the Free Syrian Army at the
Palestine Hospital. She fled before the mukhabrat came looking for her at
her house in the Zahra neighborhood in Damascus.
Many more are no
longer able to convey their own story of the war because they were killed,
either by Syrian Government forces, the opposition, other parties or US-led
airstrikes. A particularity moving account was of the execution of a
16-year-old girl in a public square near al-Hajar al-Aswad, after she
confessed to be a ‘spy’ for the regime. The ‘confession’ was exacted after
she was shot, point-blank, in the palm of her right hand. They claimed that
she placed GPS devices in opposition areas so that the Army may guide its
missiles based on signals it received. The Syrian Army’s barrel bombs, of
course, are not smart bombs and, in fact, none exist. The child was shot in
the face six times.
Ordinary Syrians’ narratives are often used in
media coverage of the war, but in a selective fashion, never in an honest
and true sampling. Al Mayadeen’s version of ‘average Syrians’ is almost
entirely different to that of Al-Jazeera. Syrians are used to supplement
existing media agendas, as their country is used to advance political
When the war is over, the warring parties will reach the
conclusion that they have either achieved their objectives or can no longer
do so; only Syrians will be left to put their lives back together. When the
remaining dead are buried, the missing found or declared dead, the prisoners
released or kept indefinitely, only then winning and losing will cease to
hold any meaning at all.
The tragedy in Syria is that the war
fought in the name of the Syrian people has little to do with the rights of
the Syrian people; and the voices of Syrians are either entirely neglected
or used and manipulated to achieve specific political ends. And when it is
all said and done, the media jackals are likely to fan the flame of some
other conflict in some other place.
Certainly, it is already late
for too many Syrians whose stories were buried with them, but it is not too
late for many who are still alive. We need to listen to the Syrian people,
who have been at the receiving end of death, but are yet to articulate their
own aspirations for life, and their ongoing tragedies.
– Dr. Ramzy
Baroud has been writing about the Middle East for over 20 years. He is an
internationally-syndicated columnist, a media consultant, an author of
several books and the founder of PalestineChronicle.com. His latest book is
My Father Was a Freedom Fighter: Gaza’s Untold Story (Pluto Press, London).
His website is: www.ramzybaroud.net.
Share this article with your facebook friends