Al-Jazeerah: Cross-Cultural Understanding
Opinion Editorials, November 2015
Still No Apologies from Bush and Blair for the Destruction of Iraq for Israel
By Jamal Kanj
Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, November 11, 2015
Apologetic journalists have been trying to get Bush and Blair to apologize for their 2003 invasion and destruction of Iraq, in vain. The maximum they got every time is an admission that the intelligence reports were wrong, as readers can see here.
The end outcome of the 2003 US-UK invasion of Iraq was the destruction of the strongest Arab state, part of the Zionist long-term plan of establishing the Israeli Empire, from the Nile to the Euphrates.
The Iraq war, Blair and the other sucker
“I apologise for the fact that the intelligence we received was wrong,” Tony Blair told Fareed Zakaria during a CNN interview.
The TV interview came ahead of the much delayed British Chilcot Inquiry report, investigating the Iraq war, now expected by summer 2016.
Blair also apologised “for some of the mistakes in planning” the war.
It didn’t, however, come clear from the interview what were “some of” the correct decisions made in planning for the war.
A war made for Israel
The war was neither a mistake, nor based on “wrong” intelligence. It was well thought of by those who cooked the intelligence book and sold it to two suckers named George W. Bush and Tony Blair.
The plan intended to break up Iraq, destroy its know-how by assassinating Iraqi scientists, and dismantle the Iraqi army.
…Blair’s infamous dossier on Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction included 11 pages copied “verbatim, from an Israeli journal, Middle East Review of International Affairs”. (Jeffrey Steinberg, Executive Intelligence Review)
Not because Iraq was a threat to America, but because destroying Iraq was on Israel’s agenda.
On 21 February 2003, Jeffrey Steinberg wrote in the Executive Intelligence Review that Blair’s infamous dossier on Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction (WMD) included 11 pages copied “verbatim, from an Israeli journal, Middle East Review of International Affairs”. According to Steinberg, the Blair dossier was “cooked-in-Israel propaganda” to drive the US to invade Iraq.
Complementing Blair’s hoax, US Zionists-neoconservatives waged a misleading campaign to influence American public opinion and to deceive officials on the cost of war and its aftermath.
Israel’s war pimps
On 11 July 2002, Richard Perle, a Pentagon official who was on Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s payroll in mid-1990s, professed the war will end “after the first whiff of gunpowder”.
His ex-boss, Netanyahu, gave a congressional testimony two months later where he promised America: “If you take out Saddam regime, I guarantee it will have enormous positive reverberation on the region.”
About a month before the war, Israel-firster and American official Kenneth Adelman published an op-ed in the Washington Post, positing that the war “would be a cakewalk”.
In briefing the Senate Armed Services Committee on 25 February 2003, General Eric Shinseki, Chief of Staff of the US Army, warned that “several hundred thousand soldiers” would be needed to secure postwar Iraq. Days later, civilian Zionist-neoconservative Paul Wolfowitz countered: “The notion that it will take several hundred thousand troops is wildly off the mark.”
In his book Plan of Attack, Bob Woodward wrote that Secretary of State Colin Powell used to refer to the Office of Special Plans (war bureau) as “a separate government”.
The office was led by Zionist-neoconservatives Lewis Libby and Wolfowitz, and, according to Powell, was run from Douglas Feith’s “Gestapo” office.
Soon following the invasion, Wolfowitz assured the House Appropriations Committee and American taxpayers that the war cost and rebuilding “doesn’t have to be US taxpayers’ money”. We have “a country that can really finance its own reconstruction”. Wolfowitz’s statement cost the taxpayers between two to six trillion dollars.
After the Zionist-neoconservatives’ WMDs were exposed as a fiction, Wolfowitz offered a new fallacious assessment. He claimed that removing Saddam would help in the peace between Israel and the Palestinians.
Suppressed FBI probe
The Zionist-neoconservatives’ undue influence drew the attention of the FBI. There were public reports in July 2004 of a probe by the FBI into potential Israeli spies in the Pentagon who might have influenced the US decision on the war.
The FBI inquiry was quashed and Americans never discovered the Israeli spies who blundered America and Britain’s human and financial resources on a “made for Israel war”.
The FBI suspected the Israeli mole was a senior analyst closely associated with two senior officials: Zionist-neoconservatives Wolfowitz and Feith. It believed that “highly sensitive information” was passed to Israel via “the pro-Israel lobby group, American Israel Public Affairs Committee [AIPAC].”
The FBI inquiry was quashed and Americans never discovered the Israeli spies who blundered America’s and Britain’s human and financial resources on a “made for Israel war”.
Hence, Chilcot has an opportunity now to dissect the Israeli “sacred cow” and identify the source of the “wrong” intelligence. It should start by deciphering the palpable link between the US Zionist-neoconservatives’ ideologues and Israel.
Undeniably, Saddam was a brutal dictator. But the war, the preceding economic blockade and Netanyahu’s promised “enormous reverberation on the region” are causing more human deaths than Saddam ever did.
The world might be better with one less Arab dictator, though it would have been a much better place without Bush and his British toady.
A version of this article was first published by the Gulf Digital News. The version here is published by permission of Jamal Kanj.***
Share this article with your facebook friends
Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent Al-Jazeerah & ccun.org.
email@example.com & firstname.lastname@example.org