Al-Jazeerah History  
	 
	
	
	Archives  
	 
	
	
	
	
	Mission & Name   
	 
	
	
	
	
	Conflict Terminology   
	 
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	
	
	Gaza Holocaust   
	 
	
	
	Gulf War   
	 
	
	Isdood  
	 
	
	
	Islam   
	 
	
	
	News   
	 
	
	
	News Photos 
	  
	 
	
	
	Opinion  
	
	
	Editorials 
	  
	 
	
	
	
	
	US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)   
	 
	
	
	www.aljazeerah.info
	  
      
       
      
        
        
     | 
     | 
    
    
      
        
          | 
           Editorial Note: The 
		  following news reports are summaries from original sources. They may 
		  also include corrections of Arabic names and political terminology. 
		  Comments are in parentheses. 
		  
		  
		  Share this article with your facebook friends   | 
         
       
     
    
        In the United Arab Emirates, Migrant 
		Domestic Workers Are Trapped, Exploited, Abused, and Get Scant 
		Protection 
		a HRW Statement  
		Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, October 27, 2014 
		
  Migrant domestic workers in the
		
		United Arab Emirates (UAE) are beaten, exploited, and trapped in 
		forced labor situations, Human Rights Watch said in a report released 
		today. The UAE government, about to take up an influential new role in 
		the International Labour Organization (ILO), has failed to adequately 
		protect female domestic workers – many of them from the Philippines – 
		from abuse by employers and recruiters.
  The 79-page report, “‘I 
		Already Bought You’: Abuse and Exploitation of Female Migrant Domestic 
		Workers in the United Arab Emirates,” documents how the UAE’s visa 
		sponsorship system, known as kafala, and the lack of labor law 
		protections leave migrant domestic workers exposed to abuse. Domestic 
		workers, most from Asia and Africa, cannot move to a new job before 
		their contracts end without the employer’s consent, trapping many in 
		abusive conditions. Labor-sending countries don’t fully protect the 
		workers against deceptive recruitment practices or provide adequate 
		assistance to abused nationals abroad.
  “The UAE’s sponsorship 
		system chains domestic workers to their employers and then leaves them 
		isolated and at risk of abuse behind the closed doors of private homes,” 
		said
		
		Rothna Begum, Middle East women’s rights researcher at Human Rights 
		Watch. “With no labor law protections for domestic workers, employers 
		can, and many do, overwork, underpay, and abuse these women.” 
		
		Human Rights Watch interviewed 99 female domestic workers in the 
		UAE, as well as recruitment agencies, lawyers, and others. Human Rights 
		Watch sent letters to 15 UAE ministries and bodies in January, April, 
		and August to seek information, request meetings, and present its 
		findings but received no response. The UAE government did have a short 
		meeting with Human Rights Watch representatives in September but did not 
		address any domestic worker issues.
  Domestic workers told Human 
		Rights Watch about not being paid, not having rest periods or time off, 
		being confined in the employer’s homes, and of excessive workloads, with 
		working days of up to 21 hours. They described being deprived of food 
		and reported psychological, physical, and sexual abuse. Many said their 
		employers treated them like animals, or as if they were dirty and 
		physical contact with them would be contaminating. In some cases the 
		abuses amounted to forced labor or trafficking.
  “My boss started 
		hitting me after two weeks of being there,” one worker said. “She hit me 
		with her fist to my chest. She scraped her fingernails to my neck, and 
		slapped my face. I was bruised on my neck. She sometimes pulled out 
		tufts of my hair.” The worker said she remained there, hoping to be 
		paid, but never was.
  At least 146,000 female migrant domestic 
		workers – possibly many more – from countries such as the
		
		Philippines,
		
		Indonesia,
		
		India,
		
		Bangladesh,
		
		Sri Lanka,
		
		Nepal, and
		
		Ethiopia work in the UAE. However, some embassies or consulates in 
		the UAE do not have shelters or adequate staffing to deal with abused 
		domestic workers.
  In June 2014, the UAE authorities revised the 
		standard domestic worker labor contract to require a weekly day off and 
		8 hours of rest in any 24-hour period. However, the contract does not 
		address other issues such as limits on working hours and is weaker than 
		labor law protections for other workers that are enforceable by judicial 
		authorities. An unpublished draft law on domestic workers has been 
		pending since 2012, but according to media reports, its contents would 
		still fall short of protections for other workers. The UAE authorities 
		have reformed some aspects of the kafala system in recent years, but not 
		for domestic workers.
  While UAE authorities have prosecuted some 
		employers for murder or extreme physical abuse, workers who seek redress 
		must overcome a host of legal and practical obstacles, particularly in 
		pursuing court remedies for contract breaches or less extreme abuse. 
		Many workers face “absconding” charges, an administrative offense, for 
		leaving an employer without consent before the contract ends. While some 
		workers said police officers treated them well, others said police 
		encouraged them to return to abusive employers. In some cases, employers 
		filed trumped-up theft charges against workers who fled.  Some said 
		court delays made them give up any hope of getting unpaid wages.
  
		Many workers said they faced further abuse if they turned to their 
		recruitment agencies for help. Some said agents forced them to return to 
		abusive employers, made them work for new families against their will, 
		confined them to their agency residence and deprived them of food, or 
		beat them when they sought help.
  “Many domestic workers who leave 
		abusive employers face a stone wall,” Begum said.  “They can be 
		prosecuted for running away, while their abusers have little to fear.” 
		 In recent years, severe abuses have led some labor-sending countries 
		to place temporary bans on migration to the UAE for domestic work. 
		Several, such as the Philippines, do not allow their nationals to travel 
		to the UAE as domestic workers unless their UAE employers and 
		recruitment agencies agree to minimum salaries and conditions. In June, 
		after the UAE authorities issued the revised contract, they called on 
		embassies to stop verifying contract guarantees before issuing visas for 
		domestic workers.  The Philippines, which is required under its domestic 
		policy to verify contract terms, found that the new contract did not 
		provide sufficient protection. It suspended its verification of visa 
		applications for domestic work, though it didn’t characterize its action 
		as a ban.
  “Where some countries stop their domestic workers from 
		migrating to the UAE, other countries fill the gap, in a race to the 
		bottom that jeopardizes workers,” Begum said. “Countries need to band 
		together to demand reforms in the UAE, and bolster their own protection 
		measures.”
  In June, ILO members elected the UAE to its governing 
		board. The UAE will participate in a
		
		session starting October 30 that will focus on a range of labor 
		issues, including
		
		forced labor.
  The UAE should reform its kafala system so 
		domestic workers can change employers without their consent and without 
		losing valid immigration status. It should pass the draft law on 
		domestic workers, in line with the ILO Domestic Workers convention, 
		raise public awareness about standards under the new domestic worker 
		contract, and expand shelter and other aid and remedies for abused 
		domestic workers.
  Labor-sending countries should increase trained 
		staff at embassies and consulates to help abused workers. They should 
		also increase cooperation with the UAE government to monitor recruitment 
		and contracts, resolve labor disputes, and combat forced labor.
  
		“As it takes its seat on the ILO’s governing body, the UAE needs to make 
		labor rights a reality at home, including for migrant domestic workers,” 
		Begum said.
  For selected accounts from the report, please see 
		below.
  “‘I Already Bought You’: Abuse and Exploitation of Female 
		Migrant Domestic Workers in the United Arab Emirates” is available at: 
		
		http://hrw.org/node/129798
  For more Human Rights Watch 
		reporting on the United Arab Emirates, please visit: 
		
		http://www.hrw.org/middle-eastn-africa/united-arab-emirates
  
		For more Human Rights Watch reporting on domestic workers, please visit 
		
		http://www.hrw.org/topic/womens-rights/domestic-workers
  For 
		more information, please contact: In Manila, Rothna Begum (English): 
		+1-917-443-2221 (mobile); or 
		begumr@hrw.org. Follow on Twitter @Rothna_Begum In Manila, Carlos 
		Conde (English, Tagalog, Visayan): +63-919-911-1539 (mobile); or
		condec@hrw.org. Follow on Twitter @condeHRW 
		In Florence, Nicholas McGeehan (English): +39-366-417-3277 (mobile); or mcgeehn@hrw.org. 
		Follow on Twitter @Ncgeehan In Berlin, Gauri Van Gulik (English, 
		Dutch, French, German): +49-30-2593-0614 (office); or +49-1570-3329592 
		(mobile); or gulikg@hrw.org. Follow 
		on Twitter @GauriHRW In New York, Nisha Varia (English): 
		+1-917-617-1041 (mobile); or 
		varian@hrw.org. Follow on Twitter @Nisha_Varia In Beirut, Nadim 
		Houry (Arabic, French, English): +961-3-639-244 (mobile); or
		houryn@hrw.org. Follow on Twitter @nadimhoury 
		In Amman, Fadi al-Qadi (English, Arabic): +962-796-992-396; or 
		+962-796-992-396 (mobile); or 
		qadif@hrw.org. Follow on Twitter @fqadi
  Selected Accounts 
		From the Report The following excerpts provide examples of abuses 
		domestic workers in the UAE described to Human Rights Watch. The names 
		of the domestic workers have been changed to protect their privacy and 
		security. 
  Shelly A., a Filipina worker, said her employer forced 
		her to work under threat of physical abuse. Her employer paid her only 
		for the first three months, then withheld her salary but made her sign 
		receipts to say she had received her full salary. Her employer also took 
		her passport, confined her to the house, and beat her, telling her, “If 
		you had done work then we won’t hit you.” 
  Sabina S., a Filipina 
		worker, said her employer made her work 20 hours a day with no breaks, 7 
		days a week, for a family of 12. She verbally and physically abused 
		Sabina, took her passport and phone, and confined her in the house. 
		Sabina told Human Rights Watch: Madam said, “When you finish your 
		contract we will pay.” After two years I asked for my money. But madam 
		lost my passport. She said, “You have to wait until passport is claimed 
		[processed]. I will give you money when you are leaving.” Sabina was 
		not paid for the two years and seven months she worked and was still 
		waiting to receive her salary when she spoke to Human Rights Watch.  
		 Tahira S., an Indonesian worker, said her employer locked her inside 
		the woman’s home, shouted at, beat her, and broke a bone in her arm. The 
		employer confiscated Tahira’s passport, made her work  15 hours 
		each day without rest periods or  days off, made her sleep on the 
		floor with no blanket or mattress, gave her food only once a day and 
		withheld it if her work was not deemed satisfactory. The employer 
		promised to pay her only at the end of her contract, but then paid her 
		nothing. Tahira told Human Rights Watch: My boss started hitting me 
		after two weeks of being there. Even though she hit me every day I 
		wanted to wait for my salary. I thought if I waited three months I could 
		get the money. She hit me with her fist to my chest. She scraped her 
		fingernails to my neck, and slapped my face. I was bruised on my neck. 
		She sometimes pulled out tufts of my hair.
  
		*** 
		
		 
		Share this article with your facebook friends
		
		
     
       
      Fair Use
      Notice 
      This site contains copyrighted material the
      use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
      owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance
      understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
      democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this
      constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
      in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
      Section 107, the material on this site is
      distributed without profit to those
      who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
      for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
      If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of
      your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
      copyright owner.
       
       
        | 
     | 
     
      
      
      
      
     |