Al-Jazeerah History  
	 
	
	
	Archives  
	 
	
	
	
	
	Mission & Name   
	 
	
	
	
	
	Conflict Terminology   
	 
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	
	
	Gaza Holocaust   
	 
	
	
	Gulf War   
	 
	
	Isdood  
	 
	
	
	Islam   
	 
	
	
	News   
	 
	
	
	News Photos 
	  
	 
	
	
	Opinion  
	
	
	Editorials 
	  
	 
	
	
	
	
	US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)   
	 
	
	
	www.aljazeerah.info
	  
      
       
      
        
        
     | 
     | 
    
     
      Rouhani Was Condemned by Netanyahu Even 
	  Before Speaking About Peace!  
	By Uri Avnery 
      Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, September 30, 2013
    The Real Bomb   
	  YEARS AGO, I disclosed one of the biggest secrets about Iran: Mahmoud 
	  Ahmadinejad was an agent of the Mossad.   Suddenly, all the curious 
	  details of his behavior made sense. His public fantasies about the 
	  disappearance of Israel. His denial of the Holocaust, which until then had 
	  been typical only of a lunatic fringe. His boasting about Iran’s nuclear 
	  capabilities.   Cui bono? Who had an interest in all this nonsense? 
	    There is only one sensible answer: Israel.   His posturing 
	  depicted Iran as a state which was both ridiculous and sinister. It 
	  justified Israel’s refusal to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty or 
	  to ratify the Chemical Weapons Convention. It diverted attention from 
	  Israel’s refusal to discuss the occupation of the Palestinian territories 
	  or hold meaningful peace negotiations.     ANY DOUBT that I may have 
	  felt about this international scoop has evaporated now.   Our 
	  political and military leaders almost openly bemoan the demise of 
	  Ahmadinejad.    Obviously, the Supreme Guide, Ali Khamenei, decided 
	  that I was right and has quietly disposed of this clown.    Worse, 
	  he has reaffirmed his deadly enmity to the Zionist Entity by pushing 
	  forward a person like Hassan Rouhani.   Rouhani is the very opposite 
	  of his predecessor. If the Mossad had been asked to sketch the worst 
	  possible Iranian leader Israel could imagine, they would have come up with 
	  someone like him.   An Iranian who recognizes and condemns the 
	  Holocaust! An Iranian man who offers sweetness and light! An Iranian who 
	  wishes peace and friendship on all nations – even hinting that Israel 
	  could be included, if only we give up the occupied Palestinian 
	  territories!   Could you imagine anything worse?    I AM not 
	  joking. This is deadly serious!   Even 
	  before Rouhani could open his mouth after his election, he was condemned 
	  outright by Binyamin Netanyahu.   A wolf 
	  in sheep’s clothing! A real anti-Semite! A cheat out to deceive the whole 
	  world! A devious politician whose devilish aim is to drive a wedge between 
	  Israel and the naive Americans!    This is the real Iranian bomb, 
	  far more threatening than the nuclear one that will be built behind the 
	  smokescreen of Rouhani’s sweet talk!    A nuclear bomb can be 
	  deterred by another nuclear bomb. But how do you deter a Rouhani?    
	  Yuval Steinitz, our failed former Minister of Finance and at present 
	  responsible for our “strategic thinking” (yes, really!) exclaimed in 
	  despair that the world wants to be deceived by Iran. Binyamin Netanyahu 
	  called it a “honey trap”. Commentators who are hand-fed by “official 
	  circles” (i.e. the Prime Minister’s Office) proclaim that he is an 
	  existential threat.   All this before he had uttered a word.    
	  WHEN ROUHANI at long last made his Grand Speech at the UN General 
	  Assembly, all the dire forebodings were confirmed.   Where 
	  Ahmadinejad had set off a stampede of delegates from the hall, Rouhani 
	  packed them in. Diplomats from all over the world were curious about the 
	  man. They could have read the speech a few minutes later, but they wanted 
	  to see and hear for themselves. Even the US sent officials to be present.
	  No one left.   
	  No one, that is, except the Israelis. 
	    The Israeli diplomats were instructed by 
	  Netanyahu to leave the hall demonstratively when the Iranian started to 
	  speak.   That was a stupid gesture. As 
	  rational and as effective as a little boy’s tantrum when his favorite toy 
	  is taken away.   Stupid, because it painted Israel as a spoiler, at 
	  a time when the entire world is seized by an attack of optimism after the 
	  recent events in Damascus and Tehran.   Stupid, because it proclaims 
	  the fact that Israel is at present totally isolated.     BY THE way, 
	  did anyone notice that Rouhani was constantly wiping his brow during his 
	  half-hour speech? The man was obviously suffering. Did another Mossad 
	  agent sneak into the UN maintenance room and shut down the 
	  air-conditioning? Or was it just the heavy robes?   I never became a 
	  priest, not only because I am an atheist (in common with many priests, I 
	  suspect) but also because of this obligation to wear the heavy clothes 
	  which all creeds demand. Same goes for diplomats.   After all, 
	  priests and diplomats are human beings, too! (Many of them, at least.)   
	    ONLY ONE Israeli cabinet member dared to criticize the Israeli exit 
	  openly. Ya’ir Lapid. What has come over him? Well, polls show that the 
	  rising star is not rising any more. As Minister of Finance he has been 
	  compelled to take very unpopular steps. Since he does not speak about 
	  things like the occupation and peace, he is considered shallow. He has 
	  almost been pushed aside. His blunt criticism of Netanyahu may bring him 
	  back into the center.   However, he has put his finger on a central 
	  fact: that Netanyahu and his crew behave exactly as the Arab diplomats 
	  used to do a generation ago. Meaning, they are stuck in the past. They 
	  don’t live in the present.   Living in the present needs something 
	  politicians are loath to do: thinking again.   Things are changing. 
	  Slowly, very slowly, but perceptibly.    It is far too early to say 
	  much about the Decline of the American Empire, but one does not need a 
	  seismograph to perceive some movement in that direction.   The 
	  Syrian affair was a good example. Vladimir Putin likes to be photographed 
	  in judo poses. In judo, one exploits the momentum of one’s opponent to 
	  bring him down. That is exactly what Putin did.   President Obama 
	  has painted himself into a corner. He mouthed belligerent threats and 
	  could not retreat, though the US public is in no belligerent mood. Putin 
	  released him from the dilemma. For a price.    I don’t know if Putin 
	  is such an agile player that he pounced on a side remark by John Kerry 
	  about Bashar Assad’s chance of relinquishing his chemical weapons. I 
	  rather suspect that it was all arranged in advance. Either way, Obama got 
	  off the hook and Putin was in the game again.   I have very mixed 
	  feelings about Putin. He has done to his Chechen citizens very much what 
	  Assad is doing to his Sunni citizens. His treatment of dissidents, such as 
	  the Pussy Riot band, is abominable.   But on the international 
	  stage, Putin is now the peacemaker. He has taken the sting out of the 
	  chemical weapons’ crisis, and may quite possibly take the initiative in 
	  providing a political settlement for that dreadful civil war.    The 
	  next step could well be to play a similar role in the Iranian crisis. If 
	  Khamenei has come to the conclusion that his nuclear program may not be 
	  worth the economic misery of the sanctions, he may well sell it to the US. 
	  In this case, Putin can play a vital role, mediating between two tough 
	  traders who have a lot to trade.    (Unless, of course, Obama 
	  behaves like the American who bought a carpet in a Persian bazaar. The 
	  seller asked for 1000 dollars, and the American paid up without haggling. 
	  When told that the carpet was worth no more than a hundred dollars, he 
	  answered: “I know, but I wanted to punish him. Now he won’t be able to 
	  sleep, cursing himself for not asking 5000 dollars.”)    HOW DO we 
	  fit into this changing scene?   First of all, we must start 
	  thinking, much as we would prefer to avoid it. New circumstances demand 
	  new thoughts.    In his own US speech, 
	  Obama made a clear connection between the Iranian bomb and the Israeli 
	  occupation. This linkage cannot be unlinked. Let’s grasp it.   
	  The US is today a bit less important than it was yesterday. Russia is a 
	  bit more important than it was. As its futile attack on Capitol Hill 
	  during the Syrian crisis shows, AIPAC is also less powerful.    
	  Let’s think again about Iran. It’s too early to conclude how far Tehran is 
	  moving, if at all. But we need to try. Walking out of rooms is not a 
	  policy. Entering rooms is.   If we could restore some of our former 
	  relationship with Tehran, or even just take the sting out of the present 
	  one, that would be a huge gain for Israel. Combining this with a real 
	  peace initiative vis-a-vis the Palestinians would be even better.   
	  Our present course is leading towards disaster. The present changes in the 
	  international and the regional scenes can make a change of course 
	  possible.    Let’s help President Obama 
	  change American policy, instead of using AIPAC to terrorize Congress into 
	  blindly supporting an outdated policy towards Iran and Palestine. 
	  Let’s extend cautious feelers towards Russia. Let’s change our public 
	  stance, as the leaders of Iran are doing with such success.    Are 
	  they more clever than us?   
	  
       | 
     | 
     
      
      
      
      
     |