Al-Jazeerah History  
	 
	
	
	Archives  
	 
	
	
	
	
	Mission & Name   
	 
	
	
	
	
	Conflict Terminology   
	 
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	
	
	Gaza Holocaust   
	 
	
	
	Gulf War   
	 
	
	Isdood  
	 
	
	
	Islam   
	 
	
	
	News   
	 
	
	
	News Photos 
	  
	 
	
	
	Opinion  
	
	
	Editorials 
	  
	 
	
	
	
	
	US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)   
	 
	
	
	www.aljazeerah.info
	  
      
       
      
        
        
     | 
     | 
    
       
	De-Zionization of Israel, US-European Foreign 
	Policy Is Prerequisite for Ending Arab-Israeli Conflict  
	By Nicola Nasser 
	Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, November 5, 2013
  
	Drying Up Ideological Wellsprings of Arab – Israeli Conflict 
	Gradually, awareness that de-Zionization of the US and European foreign 
	policy as well as the internal policies of the State of Israel has become a 
	prerequisite for peace in the Middle East is steadily taking roots in 
	Israeli and world public opinion and consciousness.   However this 
	awareness has yet to wait for drying up the Zionist ideological wellsprings 
	of the Arab – Israeli conflict and translating it into real politics by de-Zionization 
	of Israel and disengaging western foreign policy from its ideological 
	attachment to Zionism.   In his article published by Foreign Policy on 
	last October 25, James Traub quoted US President Barak Obama in a speech 
	last May, “announcing a re-formulation of the war on terror,” as saying: “We 
	cannot use force everywhere that a radical ideology takes root;” the only 
	alternative to “perpetual war” is a sustained effort to reduce “the 
	wellsprings of extremism.”   The “wellsprings” of “perpetual wars” and 
	“extremism” in the Middle East during most of the past twentieth century 
	until now could easily be detected in the unholy combination of real 
	politics and the “radical ideology” of the secular - turned - religious 
	Zionism.   This combination made it possible and seemingly ethical for 
	Americans and Europeans to accept and justify the unethical displacement of 
	the indigenous Arab people of Palestine to be replaced by a multi-national 
	artificial gathering of Jews who suffered oppression, anti – Semitism, 
	pogroms and holocaust in their western home countries.   US and 
	European continued attachment to the Zionist ideology lies at the heart of 
	their treatment of Israel, the offspring of this ideology, as one of their 
	top “vital interests” in the Middle East, which is an attachment that in 
	turn lies at the heart of anti-Americanism and other forms of Arab conflicts 
	with the “west.”      The safe haven of the “new world” in 
	America was a timely and practical solution for Europeans to get rid of and 
	solve their “Jewish Question;” it now absorbs more Jews than Israel does. 
	  The communists offered their own solution; it materialized in the 
	Jewish autonomous “Oblast” first ever republic in the Russian Birobidzhan, 
	close to the border of the former Soviet Union with China, which was home to 
	some three million Jews before some one third of them immigrated to Israel 
	following the collapse of the communist empire.   The nation states 
	basing citizenship on the rule of law is now the rule of the day in Europe, 
	where Jews enjoy full constitutional religious, civil, political and all the 
	other rights enjoyed by their compatriots.   There is no more a 
	“Jewish Question” in Europe in particular or in the west in general. If such 
	a question still persists there it is one related to the disproportionate 
	influence of Jewish citizens on the decision makers in the political, 
	financial and media arenas.   Nonetheless, the Zionist propaganda in 
	Israel and abroad is still fervently inciting that Jews are an endangered 
	species outside Israel, soliciting Jewish immigration, encouraging dual 
	citizenship and binational loyalty among them and considering all Jews 
	outside Israel as “refugees.”   Writing in the
	http://www.huffingtonpost.com 
	on September 6 last year, Hanan Ashrawi, a Palestinian leader and elected 
	parliamentarian, quoted Shlomo Hillel, a government minister and an active 
	Zionist from Iraq, as saying, “I don't regard the departure of Jews from 
	Arab lands as that of refugees. They came here because they wanted to, as 
	Zionists” and quoted Former Knesset member Ran Cohen, who immigrated from 
	Iraq, as saying: “I have to say: I am not a refugee. I came at the behest of 
	Zionism.”   Consequently, the “Jewish Question” moved ironically to 
	the very Arab safe haven to which the oppressed European Jews fled with 
	their lives to survive the culture of inquisition in Medieval Europe. The 
	largest Jewish minority among Arabs in Morocco nowadays tells the story. 
	  This Arab safe haven was turned by the Zionist ideology into a hell of 
	wars, instability, ongoing conflict and home of a revived “Jewish Question” 
	since Israel was artificially created 65 years ago in the heart of the Arab 
	world, where Jews used previously to be a prosperous minority in every one 
	of the capitals of the 22 Arab states except Jordan.   Zionism 
	justifies the creation of Israel in Palestine by two basic controversial 
	arguments: That God promised the land to Jews no matter what would happen to 
	its Arab inhabitants who was there long before Joshua and his army crossed 
	River Jordan to destroy Jericho and kill every man, woman, child and animal 
	by “God’s command.”   On November 2, 1917, British Foreign Secretary 
	then, Lord Balfour, acted as the self – appointed messenger of God’s will to 
	issue a modern God’s promise to Jews to have a “homeland” in Palestine.   
	The modern justification of the Holocaust does not care that another people, 
	namely Arab Palestinians, pay the price for a crime they did not commit. 
	  Ironic but informative as well is the fact that Zionism was not 
	originally a Jewish product.   According to the author of “Christian 
	Zionism: Road-map to Armageddon?” (InterVarsity Press, 2004) Revd. Dr. 
	Stephen Sizer, writing in the Middle East Monitor on last August 1, “The 
	origins of the movement can be traced to the early 19th century when a group 
	of eccentric British Christian leaders began to lobby for Jewish restoration 
	to Palestine as a necessary precondition for the return of Christ… Christian 
	Zionism therefore preceded Jewish Zionism by more than 50 years. Some of 
	Theodore Herzl’s strongest advocates were Christian clergy.” Dr. Sizer 
	headlined his article, “Christian Zionism: The Heresy that Undermines Middle 
	East Peace.”   He, together with the Heads of Churches in Jerusalem: 
	The Latin Patriarch Michel Sabbah, Archbishop Swerios Malki Mourad of the 
	Syrian Orthodox, the Episcopal Church Bishop Riah Abu El-Assal and the 
	Evangelical Lutheran Church Bishop Munib Younan issued in 2006 and signed 
	the Jerusalem Declaration on Christian Zionism, which concluded: “We 
	categorically reject Christian Zionist doctrines as a false teaching that 
	corrupts the biblical message of love, justice and reconciliation.”   
	The Zionist narrative was challenged by Israel’s “New Historians.” Benny 
	Morris, Ilan Pappe’, Avi Shlaim, Tom Segev, Hillel Cohen, Baruch Kimmerling 
	and others have already reconsidered and created a post – Zionists’ 
	awareness. Pappe’ concluded that the Zionist leaders planned and executed 
	“ethnic cleansing” to displace most of the Arab Palestinians.   Shlomo 
	Sand’s trilogy - - “The Invention of the Jewish People,” “The Invention of 
	the Land of Israel” and his upcoming third volume “The Invention of the 
	Secular Jew” - - hits hard at the very foundations of Zionism.      
	The fact that the secular Zionism was not popular among the world religious 
	Jewry in the early stages of the movement and that it is an ideology still 
	opposed by a strong Jewish minority is a fact Zionists are keen to 
	smokescreen.   “The UN avenue” in Haifa, Jerusalem and Tel Aviv was 
	renamed "The Zionism avenue" in response to the adoption by the
	United Nations General 
	Assembly (UNGA) of Resolution 3379 on November 10, 1975, which 
	determined that “Zionism is 
	a form of racism and 
	racial discrimination;” it was revoked by the UNGA resolution 46/86 in 1991; 
	the ongoing Israeli Zionist ideology and practices render its repeal a 
	premature step that should be reconsidered to reinstate it.   The 
	world community as represented by the United Nations, by adopting resolution 
	181 of 1947 dividing Palestine between its indigenous Arab Palestinians and 
	the invading aliens of the Zionist settlers played in the hands of Christian 
	and Jewish Zionism to commit an historical mistake that doomed peace in the 
	Middle East as an elusive humanitarian hope for a long time to come.   
	Jews were an integral part of the region’s history and social fabric until 
	Zionism cut this fact short. Only the prerequisite of
	de-Zionization of Israel and world politics will 
	make peace a dream that would come true in the region and restore 
	history to its normal course in it. The Crusaders’ interruption of the 
	regional history is an informative precedent from which all those concerned 
	could draw lessons.    * Nicola Nasser is a veteran Arab journalist 
	based in Birzeit, West Bank of the Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories.
	nassernicola@ymail.com 
       
       | 
     | 
     
      
      
      
      
     |