Al-Jazeerah History  
	 
	
	
	Archives  
	 
	
	
	Mission & Name   
	 
	
	
	
	Conflict Terminology   
	 
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	
	Gaza Holocaust   
	 
	
	Gulf War   
	 
	
	Isdood  
	 
	
	Islam   
	 
	
	News   
	 
	
	
	News Photos 
	  
	 
	
	
	Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)   
	 
	
	www.aljazeerah.info
	  
      
       
      
        
        
     | 
     | 
    
     
      Americans Avoid Discussions of Israel Out of 
	Fear 
  By Paul Balles 
	Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, June 10, 2013 
	   How do most Americans react to criticism of Israel? Those who 
	know little about the history avoid discussion.   Zionists and their 
	followers, believing that Israel can do no wrong, support anything that 
	Israel does.   Why do Americans avoid arguments or discussions of 
	Israel? Both guilt and fear play key roles.   Germany has "an 
	everlasting responsibility" for the crimes committed by the Nazis, 
	Chancellor Angela Merkel said recently.    President Bill Clinton 
	expressed the sense of guilt felt by many Americans about U.S. inaction 
	during the Holocaust when he said that "far too little was done" to save the 
	six million Jews from annihilation.   If one accepts the vocalizing of 
	Abe Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) Americans, like Germans, 
	should feel constant guilt for anti-Semitism.    Writer Ian P. 
	McKinney notes that countries like Canada, Germany, and France have actually 
	prosecuted individuals just for questioning the conventional version of the 
	“Holocaust.”   McKinney adds, "Even here in America, where it is not 
	yet illegal to publicly ask the wrong questions, any public figure that does 
	so is subjected to smears, intimidation, and the attempted destruction of 
	his career and reputation...."   At times the guilt felt by Americans 
	is not so much associated with what they have done or failed to do, but with 
	guilt for anti-Semitism.    I suspect there's more Jew-hating in 
	America than even the Jewish population credits the less-than-open Aryans. 
	Why would US government officials cover-up an Israeli terrorist attack on 
	America?   In 1967 Israel treacherously attacked the USS Liberty. 
	Israel knew it was a U.S. naval vessel in international waters.   
	Comments McKinney, "The greatest outrage that day was not the perfidy of 
	Israel, however, but the treasonous compliance of the politicians in 
	Washington, who refused to take any action against Israel and hushed-up the 
	whole affair."   Israel attacks America and gets away with it. Could 
	Israel do that without American guilt?   Adds McKinney, "Another 
	example of Israel’s callous disregard for its supposed 'ally' America was 
	the bombing of the U.S. Marine barracks in Lebanon in 1983, which killed 
	over 200 U.S. servicemen.   "According to former Israeli Mossad agent, 
	Victor Ostrovsky, Israeli intelligence knew of the plan by Arab terrorists 
	to bomb the building in plenty of time to warn the innocent men, but 
	cynically refused to say anything."   In addition to guilt as a root 
	cause for avoiding any honest discussion of Israel, even when it attacks 
	America, Abe Foxman refers to fear.   Foxman says, "America is now 
	questioning where the balance is between security and freedom of expression: 
	Should we follow the ethnic communities? Should we be monitoring mosques? 
	This isn’t Muslim-baiting — it’s driven by fear, by a desire for safety and 
	security."   Of course Foxman and the ADL have been constant reminders 
	of how fear plays a major role in Jewish thought.   From the Israeli 
	propaganda arm that supports every imaginable use of defence as a rationale 
	for murdering Americans to creating defence shields.   Two American 
	scholars, Professors Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer, had the courage to 
	expose truths that many believed but everyone was afraid to expose: the 
	effective control of the country by AIPAC.   In their book, The Israel 
	Lobby, Mearsheimer and Walt argue that "No lobby has managed to divert U.S. 
	foreign policy as far from what the American national interest would 
	otherwise suggest."   The aftermath of the book’s publication has been 
	hundreds of papers and essays both attacking and defending it.   The 
	anomaly has been the attraction of commentators who clearly express 
	anti-Semitism. This elicits both fear in Jewish lobbyists and guilt in their 
	targets.   
       
       | 
     | 
     
      
      
      
      
     |