Al-Jazeerah: Cross-Cultural Understanding
| 
      
		www.ccun.org www.aljazeerah.info  | 
    
       Opinion Editorials, August 2013  | 
    ||||||||||||||||||
|  
       Archives Mission & Name Conflict Terminology Editorials Gaza Holocaust Gulf War Isdood Islam News News Photos Opinion Editorials US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles) www.aljazeerah.info 
 
 
 
  | 
    
     Not Too Big to Jail: 
	Why Eliot Spitzer Is 
	Wall Street's Worst Nightmare 
	
	 Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, August 22, 2013 Before Eliot Spitzer’s infamous resignation as 
	governor of New York in March 2008, he was one of our fiercest champions 
	against Wall Street corruption, in a state that had some of the toughest 
	legislation for controlling the banks. It may not be a coincidence that the 
	revelation of his indiscretions with a high-priced call girl came less than 
	a month after he published a bold editorial in the Washington Post titled “Predatory 
	Lenders’ Partner in Crime: How the Bush Administration Stopped the 
	States from Stepping in to Help Consumers.” 
	The editorial exposed the collusion between the Treasury, the Federal 
	Reserve and Wall Street in deregulating the banks in the guise of regulating 
	them, by taking regulatory power away from the states. It was an issue of 
	the federal government versus the states, with the Feds representing the 
	banks and the states representing consumers. Five years later, Spitzer has set out to take some of that local regulatory power back, in his run for New York City comptroller. Mounting the attack against him, however, are not just Wall Street banks but women’s groups opposed to this apparent endorsement of the exploitation of women. On August 17th, the New York Post endorsed Spitzer’s opponent and ran a scathing cover story attempting to embarrass Spitzer based on the single issue of his personal life. Lynn Parramore, who considers herself a feminist, countered in an August 8th Huffington Post article that it is likely to be in the best interests of the very women who are opposing him to forgive and move on. His stand for women’s reproductive rights and other feminist issues is actually quite strong, and his role as Wall Street watchdog protected women from predatory financial practices. As New York Attorney General, he was known as the “Sheriff of Wall Street.” He is one of the few people with not only the insight and experience to expose Wall Street corruption but the courage to go after the perpetrators. 
	Targeted for Take-down The February 2008 Washington Post article that 
	preceded Spitzer’s political travails was written when the state attorneys 
	general were being preempted by the Federal Reserve as watchdogs of the 
	banks. Critics called it a case of
	the fox 
	guarding the hen house. Spitzer wrote:  
	Several years ago, state attorneys general and others involved in consumer 
	protection began to notice a marked increase in a range of predatory lending 
	practices by mortgage lenders. . . . These and other practices, we noticed, 
	were having a devastating effect on home buyers. In addition, the widespread 
	nature of these practices, if left unchecked, threatened our financial 
	markets. 
	Even though predatory lending was becoming a national problem, the Bush 
	administration looked the other way and did nothing to protect American 
	homeowners. In fact, the government chose instead to align itself with the 
	banks that were victimizing consumers. . . . [A]s New York attorney general, 
	I joined with colleagues in the other 49 states in attempting to fill the 
	void left by the federal government. . . . 
	Not only did the Bush administration do nothing to protect consumers, it 
	embarked on an aggressive and unprecedented campaign to prevent states from 
	protecting their residents from the very problems to which the federal 
	government was turning a blind eye. . . . The administration accomplished 
	this feat through an obscure federal agency called the Office of the 
	Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). . . . In 2003, during the height of the 
	predatory lending crisis, the OCC invoked a clause from the 1863 National 
	Bank Act to issue formal opinions preempting all state predatory lending 
	laws, thereby rendering them inoperative. The OCC also promulgated new 
	rules that prevented states from enforcing any of their own consumer 
	protection laws against national banks. The federal government's actions 
	were so egregious and so unprecedented that all 50 state attorneys general, 
	and all 50 state banking superintendents, actively fought the new rules. But 
	the unanimous opposition of the 50 states did not deter, or even slow, the 
	Bush administration in its goal of protecting the banks. In fact, when my 
	office opened an investigation of possible discrimination in mortgage 
	lending by a number of banks, the OCC filed a federal lawsuit to stop the 
	investigation. 
	Less than a month after publishing this editorial, Spitzer had been exposed, 
	disgraced, and was out of office.
	Greg Palast 
	pointed to the fact that Spitzer was the single politician standing in 
	the way of a $200 billion windfall from the Federal Reserve, guaranteeing 
	the toxic mortgage-backed securities of the same banking predators that were 
	responsible for the subprime debacle. While the Federal Reserve was trying 
	to bail them out, Spitzer was trying to regulate them, bringing suit on 
	behalf of consumers.3 But he was quickly silenced, and any state 
	attorneys general who might get similar ideas in the future would be blocked 
	by the federal “oversight” then being imposed on state regulation.  
	  
	
	A Rooster to Guard the Hen House  
	
	In a July 2013 article titled “Why 
	Eliot Spitzer's Return Terrifies Big Finance,” 
	
	Thomas Ferguson, Professor of Political Science at the University of 
	Massachusetts and a senior fellow at the Roosevelt Institute, wrote of 
	Spitzer’s bid for comptroller: Suddenly, the Masters of the Universe were staring at 
	their worst nightmare: the prospect of a comeback by the only major 
	politician in the U.S. whose deeds — and not simply words —prove that he 
	does not think corporate titans are too big to jail.  
	And who in 2013 with business as usual once again the order of the day, is 
	promising to review how the Comptroller’s Office, which controls New York 
	City’s vast pension funds, does business with Wall Street and corporate 
	America.
 
	
	Yves Smith, writing on her blog Naked 
	Capitalism on July 25th,
	
	expanded on this threat. She noted that private equity [PE] investment 
	managers had persuaded their clients that their limited partnership 
	agreements [LPAs] were a form of “trade secret,” and that nobody was looking
	
	
	closely at whether PE firms were complying with the fee and expense 
	provisions of their agreements: 
	Public pension fund investors have almost universally acceded to the demands 
	of PE firms to exempt the LPAs and cash flow reports from state FOIA laws, 
	which keeps the eyes of the press and the public off the documents. 
	. . . However, the New York City Comptroller has access to this 
	critical information. Hence the freakout at the prospect that 
	Spitzer might get the job. 
	Hence also
	
	the $1.5 million ad campaign against Spitzer brought by a coalition of 
	business leaders, labor unions and women’s groups. 
	 
	
	The Issues that Matter to Women 
	
	On July 10th, the head of the local chapter of a national women’s advocacy 
	group
	
	asked a small gathering outside City Hall: 
	
	Do we want an elected official who has broken the law and who has 
	participated in sustaining an industry that we all know has a long history 
	of exploiting women and girls? 
	
	The speaker lumped Spitzer with Anthony Weiner, who is running for mayor 
	after sending out sexually explicit tweets, and Vito Lopez, who is running 
	for City Council after resigning from the Assembly over sexual harassment 
	allegations. She asked whether these men would address the issues that 
	matter to women, "or are they just going to see us as objects?" 
	
	Sexual exploitation is an issue that matters to women, but the best way to 
	save women from the sort of desperation that leads to exploitation is to 
	keep them out of ruinous debt. Wall Street fraud, corruption and abuse have 
	caused millions of homeowners to lose their homes and have tipped cities 
	toward bankruptcy; and Spitzer is one of the brave few who has exposed and 
	attempted to prosecute those predatory practices. 
	As comptroller, he could make more information available to the public 
	concerning the companies in which public pension funds are invested, look 
	out for exploitive fees, insist on plain English reporting of derivatives 
	exposure, and take steps to ensure that nurses and teachers are not being 
	financially exploited.  He can monitor contracts and business dealings and 
	help protect the city from the kinds of rip-off schemes that deplete city 
	funds for education, infrastructure, and the social safety nets that women, 
	particularly, rely on. 
	In a December 2011 article in 
	Slate 
	titled “We 
	Own Wall Street,” Spitzer argued that 
	bad corporate behavior could be stopped by a political movement uniting 
	shareholders, pension funds and mutual funds – the actual owners of the 
	corporations – who could then take coordinated action demanding transparency 
	and accountability.   
	
	This is the sort of creative thinking that will be needed if we the people 
	are to take back our power from Wall Street and the corporatocracy. We need 
	a mass movement, coordinated action, and leaders who can organize it. Eliot 
	Spitzer is one of the few people in a position to play that role who have 
	the experience, vision and courage to carry it through.  
	_______________________ 
	
	Ellen Brown is an attorney, president of the 
	Public Banking Institute, and author of twelve books including the 
	best-selling Web of Debt. In 
	The Public Bank Solution, 
	her latest book, she explores successful public banking models historically 
	and globally. Her websites are 
	http://WebofDebt.com,
	http://PublicBankSolution.com, 
	and 
	http://PublicBankingInstitute.org. 
  | 
     
      
 
 
  | 
  |||||||||||||||||
| 
       Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent Al-Jazeerah & ccun.org. editor@aljazeerah.info & editor@ccun.org  |