Mission & Name
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
A New Guinness Record in Israeli Anti-Peace
By Uri Avnery
Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, August 22, 2013
I DON’T know if the Guinness Book of World Records has a special section
If it does not, it should. That's the one competition
where we might take home a few gold medals.
The first one would
surely go to Binyamin Netanyahu.
THIS WEEK, on the eve of the first
round of serious negotiations between the Israeli Government and the
Palestinian Authority, Netanyahu did two interesting things: he announced
plans for several large new settlement projects and he accused the
Palestinians of grievous incitement against Israel.
Let’s take the
settlements first. As explained by Israeli diplomats to their American
colleagues, and repeated by all the Israeli media, poor Netanyahu had no
choice. John Kerry compelled him to release 104 Palestinian prisoners as a
“confidence building measure”. After such a momentous concession, he had to
pacify his extremist colleagues in the Likud and in the cabinet. A thousand
new housing units in the occupied territories (including East Jerusalem) was
the very minimum.
The agreement to release prisoners let loose a
veritable Witches’ Sabbath. All the newspapers and TV news programs were
awash with blood – the blood on the hands of the Palestinian murderers.
“Murderers” was the de rigeur appellation. Not “fighters”, not “militants”,
not even “terrorists”. Just plain “murderers”.
All the prisoners to
be released were convicted before the Oslo agreement was signed, meaning
that they have been in prison for at least 20 years. The probability that
they would take part in future bloody activity must be minimal.
Some of the victims' families carried out staged stormy protests, with
bloody hands and blood-smeared flags. The media vied with each other in
publishing pictures of weeping mothers (TV loves weeping women) waving
photos of their killed sons and blood-curdling descriptions of the attacks
in which they died. (Some of which were indeed atrocious.)
However, not so long ago, Netanyahu had agreed to release more than
a thousand prisoners in return for one captured Israeli soldier. This means
that one single soldier is ten times more precious than the chances of
The actual release bordered on the grotesque. In order to
avoid photos in the morning papers of the rapturous reception of the
prisoners by their families, the actual release of the first 26 prisoners
took place after midnight, in a shroud of mystery. Which reminds one of the
Biblical passage, in which David mourned for Saul, slain in battle with the
Philistines: “Tell it not in Gath, publish it not in the streets of Askelon
(both Philistine towns), lest the daughters of the Philistines rejoice, lest
the daughters of the uncircumcised triumph.” (II Samuel 1)
this testify to an atmosphere of peace on the eve of peacemaking?
Wait, there is more to come.
THE DAY the new settlement projects
were announced, Netanyahu fired off to John Kerry a furious protest against
the ongoing Palestinian “incitement” against Israel. This missive could
interest the adjudicators of the Guinness record for Chutzpah.
main evidence for Mahmoud Abbas’ perfidy, in Netanyahu’s letter, is a text
in which a minor Palestinian official called for a Palestinian state “from
Rosh Hanikra to Eilat.” Rosh Hanikra (Ras Al-Naqoura in Arabic) is on the
Lebanese border, so this state would include all of Israel. Also, during a
soccer event in Ramallah, anti-Israeli shouts were heard.
just awful. Kerry should spring from his seat in fury. Were it not for the
fact that almost all leading Likud members proclaim that the whole of
historical Palestine belongs to Israel, and Naftali Bennett, a pillar of
Netanyahu’s government coalition, just announced that the Palestinians “can
forget about” a Palestinian state.
Not to mention a certain Daniel
Seaman, the former director of the Ministry of Explaining (that’s its
real name. I didn’t make it up. Israelis don’t do propaganda, God forbid.
Seaman has just been appointed to Netanyahu’s own office, in charge of
“explaining” on the internet. This week he posted a message on facebook
addressed to Saeb Erekat, the chief of he Palestinian delegation to the
peace talks, telling him to “go and f**k himself”. To the theological
declaration by the Church of Scotland that the Jews have no special claim to
Palestine he posted the reply: “We don’t give a [obscenity] for what you
This genius of public relations is now setting up a
clandestine group of Israeli university students, who will be paid to flood
the international social media with government “explaining” material.
As for soccer fans, the Betar stadium, which is linked to the Likud,
resounds at every match with shouts of “Death to the Arabs!”'
for what the bell tolls? Nor for peace, it seems.
ONE OF the
problems is that absolutely nobody knows what Netanyahu really wants.
Perhaps not even he.
The Prime Minister is now the loneliest person
in Israel. He has no friends. He trusts nobody, and nobody around him trusts
His colleagues in the Likud leadership quite openly despise
him, regarding him as a man of no principles, without a backbone, giving in
to every pressure. This seems to have been the opinion of his late father,
who once declared that Binyamin would make a good foreign minister, but
certainly not a prime minister.
In the government he is quite
alone. Previous prime ministers had a close group of ministers to consult
with. Golda Meir had a “kitchen cabinet”. Netanyahu has no one. He does not
consult with anyone. He announces his decisions, and that’s that.
his previous terms he had at least a group of confidants in his office.
These officials have been driven out one by one by Sarah, his wife.
So, as one commentator this week reminded us, this lonely man, unaided by
any group of trusted advisors, experts or confidants, is called upon to
decide, quite by himself, the fate of Israel for generations to come.
THIS WOULD not have been so dangerous if Netanyahu had been a Charles de
Gaulle. Unfortunately, he isn’t.
De Gaulle was one of the towering
figures of the 20th century. Cold, aloof, overbearing, intensely disliked by
the rest of the world’s leaders, this extreme right-wing general took the
historic decision to give up the huge country of Algeria, four times as big
as metropolitan France.
Algeria, it must be remembered, was
officially not a colony, not an occupied territory, but a part of France
proper. It had been under French rule for more than a century. More than a
million settlers saw it as their homeland. Yet de Gaulle made the lonely
decision to give it up, putting his own life in grave danger.
then, Israeli leftists have yearned for “an Israeli de Gaulle”, who would do
their job for them, according to the old Hebrew adage that “the work of the
righteous is done by others” – others meaning, one assumes, people who are
not quite so righteous.
There is, of course, one important
difference. De Gaulle was supported by his conservative allies, the tycoons
of the French economy. These sober-minded capitalists saw how the Germans
were taking over the economy of Europe, which was in the process of uniting,
while France was wasting its resources on an expensive, totally useless
colonial war in North Africa. They wanted to get rid of it as quickly as
possible, and de Gaulle was their man.
Netanyahu is as close to the
Israeli tycoons as de Gaulle was to his, but our tycoons don’t give a damn
about peace. This attitude may change, if ever the de-legitimization of
Israel becomes a serious economic burden.
In this context;
the boycott imposed by the European Union against the products of the
settlements may be a harbinger of things to come.
By the way, the
petition submitted by me and Gush Shalom in the Supreme Court, against the
new law to penalize advocates of a boycott of the settlements, will be heard
only next February. The court is obviously shrinking back from handling this
hot potato. But it paid us a unique compliment: “Avnery v. the Knesset” will
be heard by nine supreme judges, almost the full membership of the court.
SO IS this “peace process” serious? What does Netanyahu want?
Does he want to enter the history books as the “Israeli de Gaulle”, the wise
Zionist leader who put an end to 120 years of conflict?
Or is he
just another smart guy who is making a tactical
move to avoid a tussle with the US and stop the de-legitimization process at
least for a while?
As it looks now,
de Gaulle in his heaven can relax. No competitor in sight.
There is not the slightest indication of any peace orientation. Quite the
contrary. Our government is using the new “peace process” as a smoke screen
behind which the settlement bulldozer is working full time.
government condemns the EU boycott resolution because it “harms the peace
process”. It rejects all demands for freezing the settlements because this
would “obstruct the peace process”. Investing hundreds of millions in
settlements which under any imaginable peace agreement will have to be
evacuated is, it seems, favorable for peace.
So is there hope? Time
to quote again the Yiddish saying: “If God wills, even a broomstick can