Al-Jazeerah: Cross-Cultural Understanding

Opinion Editorials, May 2012


Al-Jazeerah History


Mission & Name  

Conflict Terminology  


Gaza Holocaust  

Gulf War  




News Photos  

Opinion Editorials

US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)




Gilad Atzmon, The Wandering Who?
A Study of Jewish Identity Politics

Reviewed by Mazin Qumsiyeh

Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, Monday, May 7, 2012


Gilad Atzmon, The Wandering Who? A Study of Jewish Identity Politics (Ropley, Hampshire, UK: Zero Books, 2011). Pp.177. Paperback. ISBN-13: 9781846948756. Review by Mazin Qumsiyeh
Copy Right: Holy Land Studies, May 2012, Vol. 11, No. 1 : pp. 99-101

About nine years ago, I entertained the notion of writing a book on “group identities” so that I can understand these concepts that cause a lot of the ills of society. Both WWI and WWII emanated from interpretations of nationalism (a group identity) and the conflict in Palestine mostly emanates from another group identity called Zionism. The horrors of the Crusaders came from the group identity of Christendom. There is an issue now with the notions of (Political) “Islamism" ala Osama Bin Laden. I am still exploring and reading on this issue from different authors and thus was intrigued to read the book by Gilad Atzmon that addresses this concept within Jewish communities.

Atzmon concluded from personal experience that he does not like Jewish group identity politics and any other form of what he calls “marginal group identity”. Atzmon starts by explaining his own upbringing as a third generation Israeli whose grandfather was a member of the underground terror organization the Irgun Gang and how via Jazz (and a questioning mind) he “left Chosen-ness behind to become an ordinary human being”.

Atzmon is accused by many to be a “self-hating Jew” and an “anti-Semite”. To the former label he admits but he strongly objects to the second label. His book represents in many ways a clarification of why he believes the way he does. He says (p. 15) that he distinguishes Jews (the people), Judaism (the religion), and Jewish-ness (the ideology). He has no problem with the first two but strongly argues against that third. He puts quotes that show that those who believe in this ideology put Jewish-ness above all other attributes. Thus he understands Chaim Weizmann’s statement that “there are no English, French, German, or American Jews, but only Jews living in England, France, Germany or America.” This third category that Weizmann belongs to even when overlapping with the first or second category, tends to according to Atzmon, overwhelm all other and represent a strong marginal politics.

Using these definitions, Atzmon proceed to explain how and why this belief (identity politics of Jewish-ness) was critical in the error of going to war on Iraq, in the spying by Jonathan Pollard, in the neoconservative ideologies of Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle, and even in economic decisions of Alan Greenspan. He makes clear that he does not see these things as Jewish conspiracies but merely independent actions based on a set of political/ideological discourse (the Jewish identity politics). My thought is that individual readers should not judge this based on hearsay but should do it for themselves by reading the book. If one gets convinced by Atzmon’s analysis, one could get to the radical conclusion that he makes that “one can hardly endorse a universal philosophy while being identified politically as a Jew” (p. 39).

According to Atzmon, the problems with marginal identity politics such as those of “Jewish-ness” and its alter-ego Zionism is that they are defined by negation: “the political Jew is always against something or set apart from something else. This is far from being an ideal recipe for a peaceful, ethical life, driven by reconciliation and harmony.” (p. 48).

But Atzmon goes further and here I believe is where his thesis draws the wrath of some in the establishment and overtly sensitive crowds: Zionism is a “tribal Jewish preservation project” and “within the Zionist framework, the Israelis colonize Palestine and the Jewish Diaspora is there to mobilise lobbies by recruiting International support. The Neocons transform the American army into an Israeli mission force. Anti Zionists of Jewish descent (and this may even include proud self-haters such as myself) are there to portray an image of ideological plurality and ethical concern.”(p. 70). And in the secular Jewish political discourse, there is no need for God, political Jews are taught to value the Jewish collective and inflict damage to others in the name of this collective according to Atzmon.

Many things he says do make sense even if we may quibble with other things. In explaining “pre-traumatic stress syndrome” he explains that any Jews are taught to anticipate negative things and that in this regard those who actually experienced the negative things (e.g. holocaust survivors) seem more rational and far less hateful of the other than the Jews who did not experience those directly. The latter may even invent events to justify the perpetual fear and hatred. I thought of this as I thought of all the Zionists who lied, cheated, pressured, cajoled, threatened us and our friends and employers and contrasted those with fellow human beings who happen to have a Jewish background (including many holocaust survivors) who stood with us in fighting for human rights. He explained to me that in this area his study and personal experience were the most significant of his controversial findings.

Atzmon argues rather convincingly that “it is not the idea of being unethical that torments Israelis and their supporters, but the idea of being ‘caught out’ as such” (p. 84). This phobia according to Atzmon explains the amount of death and destruction that Israel sows in its surroundings in an attempt to resolve or at least distract from this inner conflict between the tribal and the universal. But this only adds to the phobia for to Atzmon ‘the more they insist on loving themselves for who they think they are, the more they loath themselves for what they have become.” (p. 86). He claims that that leaves three escape routes: total segregation, return to orthodoxy (religion), and flight from “Jewish-ness” (an option he had chosen).

I see in Atzmon writings a number of memes that are seeping into common discourse. A meme is a persuasive idea that spreads in a population like a useful gene spreads in a population. Some of those memes include:
-The now well-established fact that Jews are not a racial group but an ideological religious belief that spread many centuries ago among people of diverse background (this meme came from studies of the Khazars and others by authors like Arthur Koestler, Kevin Alan Brooks, Shlomo Sand, and now Atzmon)
-The idea of a conflict between chauvinistic nationalism and universal humanism.
-The weird mix of religious heritage/belief with tribal notions in Jewish political discourse
-The distorted recruitment of archeological and other studies to support the political ideology of a connection between Jews of today and Israelites of the bible
-The recruitment of the ideology of suffering as a quasi-religious belief that is no longer subject to normal historical examinations (and in fact shielded from such historical examination via laws)

In some places, one could argue that Atzmon goes too far in his conclusions or does not delve as deep as possible in the nuances of identity politics. For example he argues that those who identify themselves as politically Jewish but anti-Zionist serve the same goal as Zionist Jews by keeping the debate “within the family” (p. 102). In another chapter (Chapter 19), Atzmon analyzes the book of Esther and its associated Purim holiday in a political modern context to argue that the lessons drawn from the modern emphasis on the book of Esther (which does not mention God) is the need for Jews to rely on themselves and to get to positions of power in Goyim (gentile) societies to impact their own future. While that interpretation explains the Zionist lobbies in Western countries, some people who are not tribal in their thinking may draw other lessons from the book of Esther or at least downplay it and emphasize other parts of the Torah..

In another place Atzmon questions the sincerity of a Zionist who was part of the group that collaborated with Hitler and who later reported to Lenni Brenner (a historian of the Nazi-Zionist collaboration) that they were wrong and that he is now an American with American loyalties. Atzmon thinks that this relates to the old edict “of being a Jew at home, and a gentile in the streets” (Moses Mendelssohn’s “Haskala Mantra”).

One could quibble with some of these notions, connections, and conclusions. Atzmon's opinions are to be respected even if some of them are based on subjective judgments about other individuals' emotions and motivations. That is because many of his opinions are also shaped by personal experiences. Other parts of the book are intimate and personal and I do not see how Atzmon’s detractors can challenge him on that. For example I fully agree with him that “fighting racism for real primarily entails opposing the racist within” (p. 95). Each of us must fight the demons within before we challenge the demons without. I found these sections of the book which discuss Atzmon's own reflections on his past and evolution of his thinking to be the most fascinating and informative.

As for the other (related) themes and notions presented in this fascinating book, I think this is a very important dialogue to have even if some of us may disagree with some interpretations. The 130 years of Zionist colonization resulted in devastation of a native society and culture resulting in 7 million refugees of a total of 11 million (the rest left in shrinking "people warehouses"). Further, after several wars and countless lives destroyed, it is definitely time to discuss in more detail the motives and the psychology behind Zionism. The attempt to censor and shut down this debate is backfiring. More and more people are spreading memes that challenge the tribalism that lead to conflicts and war. People can choose to dismiss these things and avoid the dialog or can engage in it. I think it is far more constructive to engage in it than to dismiss it out of hand.



*Committee for Solidarity with Palestinian Prisoners in Israeli Jails and Popular Resistance committees in the Bethlehem area invite you to join us to stand in solidarity with Palestinian and Arab political Prisoners who are engaged in a hunger strike.
Where: South Entrance of Al-Khader Village, Al-Nashash near Hwy 60
When: Friday 4 May 2012, 2 PM
 Why: Because the thousands of Palestinians in Israeli jails are political prisoners who deserve protection and fair treatment in accordance with the 4 th Geneva Convention. 
*Inspiring Video*: Flagwoman protester raises Palestinian flag on Israeli military vehicle outside Ofer prison (she and other friends of ours are attacked and pepper-sprayed) 

This Week in Palestine" is in my humble opinion the best magazine in Palestine.  Evey issue has a theme.  This month it is the Nakba but it is with a positive spin, celebrating our resilience ansd success as a people despite the persistent efforts at ethnic cleansing over the past
64 years.  Take time to browse the articles available on the internet at
*A pattern repeats itself:* Israeli forces kill and injure civilians.  Media attention forces the Israeli authorities to start an investigation.  Years later the case dies out quietly and no one is punished. The "international community" espeially the US governement provides a diplomatic cover and scuttles any international investigations.

Is it any wonder that Israel continues to get away with it after nearly 100,000 Palestinian civilians killed via Israeli actions over the past 64 years? Is it any wonder that International law will not be enforced when it comes to the continuing ethnic cleansing and refusal to allow nearly 7 million refugees and displaced their right to choose to go back to their homes and lands?  In the latest atrocity and after over three years, the Israeli military closed the "investigation" into the murder on 5 January 2009 of 21 members of the Samouni family. The apartheid soldiers had ordered the family into the house that they then bombed and that they then investigated and found themselves innocent. 
*Book* *Review by Mazin Qumsiyeh.* Gilad Atzmon, The Wandering Who? A Study of Jewish Identity Politics (Ropley, Hampshire, UK: Zero Books, 2011).
Pp.177. Paperback. ISBN-13: 9781846948756.
Holy Land Studies (cpyrighted material), May 2012, Vol. 11, No. 1 : pp.


Tuesday 1 May 2012 is celebrated as May Day or Workers Day around the world.  On this date we all recall the struggle of workers against the greed of corporations.  It is this greed by the elites that also led to wars, colonialism, occupation, and repression in indigenous communities from Vietnam to Iraq to Palestine to Columbia.  Around the world, the billionaires get richer while the poor people get poorer. The Palestinian holocaust like the previous holocausts of Blacks (tens of millions killed in the slave trade), native Americans (perhaps as many as 100 million), Jews, Gypsies, Armenians, and others.  These actions benefitted the rich who got richer.  The history of collaboration of Zionists with the Nazi regime is now well established as is the fact that Zionism was simply the

other side of the coin of racism.   More than half of the world

billionaires are Zionists who are shameless in their support of the apartheid state of Israel in its attempted genocide of the Palestinians.  530 Towns and villages were depopulated thanks to numerous massacres committed against the native Palestinians in the past 64 years.  7 million Palestinians are refugees or displaced people.  Thousands languish as political prisoners in Israeli jails.  Those political prisoners are now engaged in a hunger strike and have called for making 1 May 2012 a day of strikes and actions to highlight the Palestinian struggle.  Whether the thousands of Palestinians in the small prisons or the millions of us languishing in large prisons like Gaza or Bethlehem, we say it is time for all of us to stand together. 

 Doing action in the direction for peace and justice is liberating to everyone. 

Consider suing Israel for genocide 

Action 1: Sign the The Peoples Charter to Create a Nonviolent World': 

Europe’s airlines enforce Israeli travel ban on activists hoping to repair Palestinian schools 

Israel (the supposed democracy) prevents its own citizens from simply holding signs with the names of the ethnically cleansed Palestinian villages on the so called "Independence day" of apartheid Israel

 (English) (Hebrew including amazing video of brave citizens standing up to fascist police) 

Action 2: Call Airlines to stop being sub-contractors to Israeli occupation

Action 3: Jewish voice for peace asking you to sign in support of 60 minutes for doing a story on Palestinian Christians that actually asked us Christians to speak! I signed.>

See also "Palestinian Christians respond to Israeli ambassador Lies" 

and "Israel’s not-so-stellar record on treatment of Christians"

I wrote this letter to the NY Times public editor (Ombudsperson), Art Brisbane,, (212)556-7652 and as a letter to the editor Please consider doing the same.

*To the editor (for publication)***

* ***

*Why does the New York Times allow itself to be a vehicle for distributing lies and hatred?  The "public service" message from Mr. Horowitz published in the NY Times is precisely that.  It claims that those who called for boycotts, divestment, and sanctions against South Africa under apartheid and now call for similar nonviolent tactics against Israeli apartheid are "anti-Semites" and worse even as promoters of genocide!***

* ***

*This is utter lies and defamation of decent people who act on their conscience to try to influence the Israeli government and elites in the same manner we succeeded in influencing the apartheid system of South Africa.  I do know that such shrill attacks will not deter those who act on their conscience. More and more Israelis and Internationals are finally saying enough is enough of these tactics of intimidation and McCarthyism.

[Below is one such voice from an Israeli Dorothy Naor which I urge you to solicit from her as an op-ed piece]. ***

* ***

*We, Palestinian Christians have also issued a call for BDS in the spirit of truth ( Humanity will not be silenced by the tactics of those who support racism and apartheid.***

* ***

*Mazin Qumsiyeh, PhD***

*Professor, Bethlehem University***

*Occupied Palestine***

See also

-------------- next part --------------

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

URL: <>





Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent Al-Jazeerah & &