First Attempt to Return to their Homeland
By Gilad Atzmon
Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, May 23, 2011
will be no return-- time has come to tell Palestinian refugees they will
not be returning to the State of Israel,”
Nahum Barnea, a prominent Israeli ‘liberal’ columnist.
It is becoming clear
that Israel lacks the means to cope with Palestinian resilience. Despite
Israeli barbarism; despite sixty-three years of oppression, racial
discrimination and mass murderous tactics-- including the usage of WMD--
the Palestinian people have remained determined to return to their land.
This week they reminded
the Israelis, world Jewry and the rest of the world that the Palestinian
cause is not going to fade away. If anything, in 2011, Palestinians seem
more decisive, firm and united than their parents’ or grandparents’
Hence, it is almost
amusing to follow the bizarre manner in which Israeli writer Barnea
tries to convince himself otherwise, proclaiming “Their politicians told
them it would happen. The clerics promised Allah’s help. Foreign
sponsors provided flags and buses. They embark on their mission with the
confidence that the Zionist project is destined to collapse. Another
small push and the entire Land of Israel, from the Jordan to the Sea,
will become Palestine.”
Whether Barnea grasps
it or not, this is indeed the vision more and more Palestinians have in
mind and this is exactly the vision I have in mind. This is the exact
vision more and more people around the world envisage as a perfect
solution, and clearly, this is the only ethical and universal solution
to this bitter conflict: Israel will be Palestine. It will stretch from
the river to the sea. And it will be a State of all its citizens as
opposed to the racially exclusivist ‘Jews only’ State.
“I have news for you,
my dear cousins*,” says Barnea in a condescending manner. “It won’t be
happening – not in your lifetime…. Sixty-three years have passed since
that war; the time has come to embrace other dreams.”
It doesn’t take a
genius to gather that Barnea, like many other Israelis, expresses
wishful thinking here rather than a reading of the reality on the
ground. As it happens - and more than a few of us detected it
decades ago - Palestinians are at the forefront of a battle for a better
world. The current regional Arab revolution is a mass call for justice,
but also for justice in Palestine. As much as the world looks with
admiration at young Muslims and Arabs making a change, it also becomes
general knowledge that Israel is the biggest threat to world peace.
The Palestinian Right of Return is about to become an
international priority issue, and Israel will be defeated on that front.
The West wouldn’t hesitate to sacrifice Israel on that issue: isolated
and humiliated, Israel is going to struggle hopelessly against the
entire region. And to clarify the matter, time is not exactly on the
side of the Jewish State.
Israel has had
sixty-three years to confront its original sin. It had a window of
opportunity to repent, and open its border to the millions of refugees
it so brutally expelled. But now the window seems to have been
closed. Israel has lost the chance to save itself from itself. And what
we saw this week was just an introduction. Israel is about to face a
tidal wave of Palestinian gatherings on its borders. Israel doesn’t
possess the political or military means to deal with these emerging
forms of non-violent resistance.
Barnea like many other
Israelis loves Abbas: according to the Israeli columnist Abbas is “the
most humane, lovely politician in the three governments currently
serving in the Land of Israel.” However, Barnea is disappointed to
find out that even Abbas “gets carried away” when he declared on the eve
of Nakba Day that no Palestinian leader will renounce the right of
return: “the return is not a slogan…Palestine is ours.”
Barnea stresses that
Abbas refrained from clarifying the question of how, and where this
right will be realised, and whether it will be through compensation or
physical return. Barnea concludes that “anyone could make what he
wanted” out of Abass’ words.” But in fact Barnea is wrong again.
Abbas' words were totally clear: there was no hidden message or even
ambiguity in them. The return is not a slogan. For a while it was a
universal and an ethical call. But as things stand this week, it is now
becoming a call for a direct action. Barnea and most Israelis may still
fail to grasp that today’s Middle East is a new entity all together.
It is united; it is firm, and it is far from timid. It is vibrant, and
revolutionary, and fuelled by yearning for justice and freedom.
Israel is surrounded by a wall of fierce resistance. As far as the
Jewish State is concerned, the countdown has begun.
Barnea ends his
diatribe by telling his fellow Israelis that “those who wish to live in
the sovereign, Zionist and democratic State of Israel have no other
option but to keep telling the Palestinians: with all due respect,
what’s in the past is in the past.”
Yet, a universal
reading of Barnea’s suggestion surely also logically implies that the
rest of us then, can also now relieve ourselves of the endless burden of
Jewish exceptional suffering too: after all, Barnea did say, ‘what’s in
the past is in the past.’ Accordingly then, if the Jews are not unique
in their collective pain, nothing should stop the Israelis from opening
a new page too, so they can cross the divide and build bridges with the
indigenous people of the land; those whom they themselves
ethnically cleansed and attempted to destroy. For if the burden of the
past can, as Barnea suggests, lose its relevance or significance, Israel
might as well live up to that, and turn its face to a brighter future
and voluntarily invite the Palestinian refugees to return to their land.
Such a move would mean an immediate end to the conflict.
But, needless to say, I
do not hold my breath.
Yet, there is one
crucial (currently hypothetical) question I must address: nowadays,
when it becomes clear that the Jewish state approaches its final phase,
how would Israelis who would like to return to Europe react
to a Barnea-like ‘no return’ statement if it were expressed by a
European ‘liberal’ columnist? How would Israelis or the rest of us
react to the following: ‘there will be no return-time has come to
tell the Jews they will not be returning to Europe’?
Such a statement would
clearly provoke outrage amongst many of us.
Yet sadly enough, we
are all too used to hear similar statements from ‘liberal’ Israelis and
*Cousins- a derogatory
manner in which Israelis refers to Palestinians, Arabs and Muslims. I
vow to explore this term and its origin in one of my next papers.
Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of
their authors and they may not represent Al-Jazeerah & ccun.org.