Mission & Name
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
Zionist Israeli Hegemony:
Something's Rotten in the Heart of Western
By Stuart Littlewood
Redress, Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, December 8, 2011
politicians cloaked in the American flag or diplomats sporting Union Jack
Stuart Littlewood considers the extent to which the US and UK
political systems have been infiltrated by Israeli stooges and highlights
the harmful effects of this Zionist deep penetration on the British and
American national interests.
Washington putting Israel above US homeowners
When Marcellus, in Shakespeare's
Hamlet, famously says, "Something's rotten in the state of
Denmark", he means that the body politic is rotting from the top down and
the corruption stinks to high heaven.
Some 410 years later the Bard's
words are especially applicable to the so-called political élite of the
Western world. The stench of their corruption is assailing the nostrils of
more and more people and causing mass nausea.
Thankfully, some small
but effective relief is available in the United States courtesy of the
Council for the National Interest Foundation (CNIF), an independent
non-profit concern that provides information and analysis on the Middle East
and its relationship to the United States. The CNIF has been doing an
excellent demolition job on US foreign policy and exposing
[www.veteranstoday.com/2011/11/23/the-cost-of-israel-to-americans/]] how it
is dangerously at odds with American values and national interests.
“...America's taxpayers give Israel over 8 million
dollars per day... Ten million American families are
reportedly sliding into foreclosure, but the US
administration continues to heap tax money onto Israel.”
The CNIF hammers home the necessity for voters and their elected
officials to be free from the undue influence and pressure of foreign
countries and their lobbyists.
The USA's uniquely massive support for
Israel, says CNIF, has cost trillions of dollars and multitudes of lives. It
has diminished America's moral standing in the world, lessened its domestic
freedoms, and exposed the American people to unnecessary and growing peril.
And yet America's taxpayers give Israel over 8 million dollars per day.
And since the US is in deficit, this means borrowing the money, handing it
to Israel, then paying interest on it for evermore afterwards. Ten million
American families are reportedly sliding into foreclosure; but the US
administration continues to heap tax money onto Israel.
It is not as
if Israel is a close ally. The Israeli regime spies on America incessantly.
Its forces have killed and injured numerous Americans with impunity. And
Israel has repeatedly stolen US technology and passed it on to other
nations, some of them America's enemies.
Israel attacked the USS Liberty, killing or injuring over 200 American
servicemen. A high ranking independent commission in 2003 found that Israel
had committed an act of war against the United States. Yet the US president
at the time, Lyndon Johnson, and his secretary of defence, James McNamara,
are said to have recalled rescue aircraft and ordered a cover-up.
Israeli aggression and defiance of international law, human rights
conventions and UN resolutions have created enormous hostility throughout
the world, much of which is directed at the US as Israel’s number one buddy,
funder and protector. Furthermore,
Israel’s nuclear arsenal is a menace both to the region itself and far
beyond. It has refused to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and the
British American Security
Information Council has found that in Israel “nuclear weapons are being
assigned roles that go well beyond deterrence”.
Gould, British Ambassador to Israel, wearing a Union Jack
kippa "in a tacky attempt to convince us he’s batting for
Britain", shaking hands with Lewis Harris, President of the
Israel, Britain and the Commonwealth Association
The fact that such weapons are in the hands of Israel’s psychopaths makes
it perfectly understandable that other nations in the region wish to acquire
them as a deterrent.
Britain’s Gould-Werritty-Mossad cover-up
US intelligence agencies have so far found no
concrete proof that Iran is developing nuclear weapons. Iran, of course, is
not happy to be constantly threatened with sanctions and pre-emptive
strikes. It demands that the American authorities publicly apologize to the
Iranian government and its citizens “for the false accusations they
publicized against Tehran in violation of international norms and
regulations”. In a letter handed to the Swiss embassy, which represents US
interests since Iran and Washington severed diplomatic relations in 1980,
Tehran also demanded compensation for material and moral damages caused by
America’ anti-Iran publicity campaign.
You'd think that a supposedly
responsible superpower like the US would seek to re-establish diplomatic
links rather than stay in a sulk for 30 years and spitefully snipe and
intimidate through third parties. America is seen to have the unmistakable
hallmarks of a playground bully who could drag us all into another world
As for Israel's war crimes in Jerusalem, the West Bank and
especially Gaza, the racist regime uses American weapons in violation of US
laws, killing and maiming huge numbers of civilians, women, and children.
This endless killing spree, funded by American taxpayers and shielded by
the US government, has caused a burning hatred of the US throughout the
Britain, as America’s and Israel’s bitch, is also
feeling the heat and putting herself in peril.
the British side of the Atlantic former ambassador Craig Murray has numerous
well-placed informants and is busy blowing the lid off one of the slimiest
intrigues ever exposed at Westminster.
"There is a huge government cover-up in progress over the
Werritty connection to Mossad and the role of British
Ambassador to Israel Matthew Gould, and their neo-con plan
to start a war with Iran.”
Craig Murray, former UK ambassador
On his website Murray has penned a marvellous piece titled “Gould-Werritty:
a real conspiracy, not a theory”.
Matthew Gould is the British ambassador to Israel and Adam Werritty is a
Zionist stooge, friend and “adviser” to disgraced Defence Secretary Liam
"There is a huge government cover-up in progress over the
Werritty connection to Mossad and the role of British Ambassador to Israel
Matthew Gould, and their neo-con plan to start a war with Iran,” says
Murray. He had made a Freedom of Information request for all communications
between Gould and Werritty and was astonished to receive a midnight reply
that his request was refused because it was “likely to exceed the cost
This was like a red rag to a bull. And it coincided with
attempts to obstruct MP Paul Flynn while questioning Cabinet Secretary Gus
O’Donnell on the Gould-Werritty connection at the House of Commons Public
Administration Committee. Flynn was repeatedly interrupted by Robert Halfon
MP who, says Murray, receives funding from the same Israeli sources as
Werritty and was formerly political director of the Conservative Friends of
Murray's concerns centre on the numerous meetings between
Fox, Werritty and Gould, and especially their “private dinner” in Tel Aviv
with Mossad. Murray claims that Gould met Werritty many times more than the
twice that O’Donnell listed in his “investigation” into the affair.
Murray observes: "It is now evident that not only did Fox, Gould and
Werritty have at least five meetings while Fox was in power – with never
another British official present – they had several meetings while Fox was
shadow foreign secretary.” He acknowledges that O’Donnell was correct in
saying that what Fox and Werritty were up to in opposition wasn’t his
concern. But what Gould – a senior official – was doing with them most
certainly was. "A senior British diplomat cannot just hold a series of
meetings with the opposition shadow defence secretary and a paid Zionist
lobbyist. What on earth was happening?"
O’Donnell, replying to
Flynn's questions about the dinner date with Mossad, said:
The important point here was
that, when the secretary of state had that meeting, he had an official
with him—namely, in this case, the ambassador. That is very important,
and I should stress that I would expect our ambassador in Israel to have
contact with Mossad. That will be part of his job. It is totally
natural, and I do not think that you should infer anything from that
about the individual’s biases. That is what ambassadors do.
But Murray is adamant. "I know from a mole that the plot involves a plan
to attack Iran."
Mad, mad world of diplomacy
Many will feel it is intolerable for a Christian
country like Britain to be represented by a Jew, especially in the Middle
East and more especially in Israel where there is bound to be a conflict of
interest. There used to be a rule in the Foreign Office, I understand,
preventing such person being appointed. Why was that rule disregarded?
Gould has been photographed wearing a Union Jack kippa in a tacky
attempt to convince us he’s batting for Britain. Can an ardent Zionist Jew
be anything but an Israel-firster? You may well ask, Fox and Werritty are
both Zionist sympathizers, as are Foreign Secretary Hague and Prime Minister
All of them appear firmly wedded to the principle expressed
in Fox’s idiotic declaration that “in the battle for the values that we
stand for ... Israel’s enemies are our enemies and this is a battle in which
we all stand together...” Fox was the man the Jewish Chronicle
hailed as “a champion of Israel within the government”, though of course
there are many others – 80 per cent of Conservative MPs for a start.
The American and British
publics have been shamefully caught up in more than enough Zionist
warmongering plots. Iraq, which we subjected to 12 years of cruel sanctions
and subsequently bombed back to the Stone Age, killing hundreds of
thousands, was never our enemy. Libya was not our enemy. Iran is definitely
not our enemy. Nor is Afghanistan; nor Syria; nor Lebanon; nor Palestine;
As I write, reports are coming in that Iran’s parliament
has voted to expel the British ambassador, presumably in retaliation for the
British Chancellor of the Exchequer [finance minister] George Osborne’s
announcement last week of fresh punitive measures targeting Iranian
financial sectors, including the Central Bank of Iran. The bill now needs
the approval of the Guardian Council.
The UK Foreign Office says it
will to react "robustly" if Iran expels its ambassador. “This unwarranted
move will do nothing to help the regime address their growing isolation or
international concerns about their nuclear programme and human rights
record. If the Iranian government acts on this, we will respond robustly in
consultation with our international partners."
However, for some
seven months this year the Foreign Office didn’t bother to send an
ambassador to Tehran when the last one finished his stint in March. Hague
and Cameron, like Obama and Clinton, apparently think it unimportant to
maintain senior level contact with the country they say is dangerous and
must be crippled by sanctions or smashed by war.
Welcome to the mad,
mad world of Zio-British and Zio-American diplomacy. Shouldn’t they be
straining every sinew to strengthen links with Iran, too long neglected? Or
are we supposed to applaud this supremely casual attitude in the matter of
key relationships that could mean life or death for millions?
stench of “something rotten in the state” is becoming unbearable. Would the
Council for the National Interest Foundation care to set up a branch here in
the UK, please, and help clean up and disinfect?