Al-Jazeerah History  
	 
	
	
	Archives  
	 
	
	
	Mission & Name   
	 
	
	
	
	Conflict Terminology   
	 
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	
	Gaza Holocaust   
	 
	
	Gulf War   
	 
	
	Isdood  
	 
	
	Islam   
	 
	
	News   
	 
	
	
	News Photos 
	  
	 
	
	
	Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)   
	 
	
	www.aljazeerah.info
	  
      
       
      
        
        
     | 
     | 
    
     
	US Elections:  
	America's Right Turn  
	By Stephen Lendman 
      Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, November 8, 2010 
	   Since the 1980s, neoliberalism dominated US politics under 
	Democrats and Republicans. Bush I continued Reagan policies. Clinton 
	hardened them. Bush II much more, and Obama so far matched Star Trek, going 
	where no administration went before. Count the ways. They're manyfold, 
	favoring business over popular interests, yet he's accused of being 
	socialist.    On November 2, angry voters responded, shifting right 
	despite favoring many left of center issues, a combination of outrage and 
	angst overriding their best interests. Go figure because what they got will 
	incense them more.   During hard times, election cycles repeat a 
	common pattern. Angry voters throw out bums for new ones, discarding them 
	next time around for still more, mindless of what an earlier article 
	explained - that US democracy is fake. The criminal class in Washington is 
	bipartisan. Mock elections pretend to be real. The process is mere kabuki 
	theater run by political consultants and PR wizards, supported by major 
	media misreporting, featuring horse race issues, not real ones.    
	Everything is pre-scripted. Secrecy and back room deals substitute for a 
	free, fair and open process. Party bosses chose candidates. Big money owns 
	them. Key outcomes are predetermined, and cheated voters get the best 
	democracy money can buy, each time no different than others.   Recall 
	November 2008. Promising change after eight George Bush/Republican dominated 
	years, Obama won the most convincing non-incumbent victory in over 50 years, 
	sweeping Democrats to large majorities in both houses.   On election 
	night, the mood celebrated hope for progressive change, an end to imperial 
	wars, and a new day for America. When word came around 10PM, expectant 
	thousands in Chicago's Grant Park erupted with chants of "yes we can," 
	hoping Obama would deliver at a time of deepening economic duress. Two years 
	later, disappointment, disillusion, frustration, and anger erupted over 
	promises made, then broken, once again betting new faces will govern better 
	than old ones. Think again.   New York Times writers took the lead 
	reporting it, Jeff Zeleny and David Herszenhorn, for example, headlining, 
	"Restive Voters Divide Power in Congress as GOP Surges to Control of House," 
	saying:   They also came close in the Senate "as discontented voters, 
	frustrated about the nation's continuing economic woes, turned sharply 
	against President Obama just two years after catapulting him into the White 
	House." It showed in how they "indiscriminately ousted Democratic incumbents 
	who loyally supported Mr. Obama's agenda," decidedly anti-populist whether 
	or not they know it.    Times writer Carl Hulse headlined "Republicans 
	Oust(ed) Old and New Democrats Alike," throwing out babies with their bath 
	water. It's what usually happens in hard times, especially when big money 
	effectively manipulates minds, pushing them right, not left, that means over 
	the cliff through planned austerity when massive stimulus and much more are 
	needed.    Universal single-payer healthcare for one. Taking money out 
	of politics another. Holding real elections, not fake ones. Giving Congress 
	back what the Constitution's Article 1, Section 8 mandates - the power to 
	create money and control the value thereof, not Wall Street bankers using it 
	to their advantage. They delivered hard times, transferring wealth from the 
	majority to themselves. Obama and Congress support them, Republicans as 
	guilty as Democrats.   The best Times writer Peter Baker could say was 
	"Somewhere along the way, the apostle of change became its target, engulfed 
	by the same currents that swept him to the White House two years ago." 
	Instead of denouncing his shameless betrayal, he said only that he "must 
	find a way to recalibrate with nothing less than his presidency on the 
	line."    Shifting right, not left, is what he means, what Clinton 
	called triangulation. Obama earlier promised austerity, more favors for 
	business, hardline immigration policy, deficit reduction, continued imperial 
	wars without saying it, and more for privilege, not people, buying into 
	Reagan's "trickle down" economics, what, Bush I called "voodoo."    
	All a Times editorial could do say is that "voters....sent President Obama a 
	loud message: They don't like how he's doing his job, they're even angrier 
	at Congressional Democrats." Republicans exploited it "turning out their 
	base....Democrats....fail(ing) to rally their own." Besides noting a shift 
	right, hard issues weren't mentioned, instead saying "his opponents (were 
	able) to spin and distort what Americans should see as genuine progress in 
	very tough times."    For Wall Street, defense contractors, Big Oil, 
	and other corporate favorites perhaps, not Main Street that drove voters for 
	change. What's coming, however, will infuriate them, what no major media 
	report will explain. For example:   -- greater than ever military 
	spending;   -- expanded wars, perhaps to new theaters at a time most 
	Americans want them ended;   -- privatizing Social Security and 
	Medicare, letting Wall Street racketeers exploit them for profit, scamming 
	the public at the same time;   -- privatizing public education as well 
	as increasingly at the university level;   -- trashing labor rights; 
	  -- hanging American workers out to dry;   -- ignoring growing 
	millions facing foreclosure;   -- letting poverty and unemployment 
	spiral out of control;   -- yet eliminating unemployment compensation 
	and other social benefits, saying they're "unaffordable;" tax cuts for the 
	rich, however, will be maintained;   -- enacting more police state 
	laws on top of many in place; and   -- turning America darker, a 
	reactionary direction pitting bread and butter issues against ruling elites, 
	both parties offering bipartisan support, especially new incumbents and 
	their leadership.   The big money backing them demands it, assuring 
	they'll get what they bought. It's how US politics works, more than ever 
	delivering the best democracy money can buy. As a result, American workers 
	are on their own, out of luck, and unsupported by both parties. Democrats 
	are no different than Republicans.    As a result, governance in 
	America is dysfunctional. The electorate remains mindless to reality. Only 
	grassroots activism might change things, sweeping all the bums out, electing 
	progressive independents, reversing repressive and corporate friendly laws, 
	as well as enacting a new constitution by national referendum, letting the 
	electorate decide, not states or Washington.   A utopian vision? 
	Absolutely, adopting working class France's 1968 slogan, "Be realistic, Ask 
	for the Impossible" through collective political action, the only way 
	"impossible" goals ever are reachable, social justice topping the list.   
	Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at
	lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. 
	Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to 
	cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio 
	News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time 
	and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy 
	listening.   
	
	http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/. 
       
       | 
     | 
     
      
      
      
      
     |