Al-Jazeerah History  
	 
	
	
	Archives  
	 
	
	
	Mission & Name   
	 
	
	
	
	Conflict Terminology   
	 
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	
	Gaza Holocaust   
	 
	
	Gulf War   
	 
	
	Isdood  
	 
	
	Islam   
	 
	
	News   
	 
	
	
	News Photos 
	  
	 
	
	
	Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)   
	 
	
	www.aljazeerah.info
	  
      
       
      
        
        
     | 
     | 
    
       
      Unrecognized Palestinians:  
	  Illegally Demolishing Their Homes and Villages
	   
	  By Stephen Lendman 
	  Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, November 22, 2010 
	     In October, the Adalah Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights 
	  in Israel, together with nine other human rights organizations, addressed 
	  a position paper on "The unconstitutionality of the state's policy of 
	  demolishing Arab Bedouin unrecognized villages in the Negev" to three 
	  Israeli officials:   -- Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,   
	  -- Attorney General Yehuda Weinstein, and   -- Minister of Justice 
	  Yaakov Neeman.   Citing the illegality of home demolitions, in this 
	  case of Arab Israeli citizens, they urged halting them immediately and 
	  finding a durable solution for unrecognized village residents. In Salim 
	  Abu- Medeghem v. The Israel Land Administration (April 14, 2007), Israel's 
	  High Court proposed replacing demolitions with solutions based on 
	  dialogue, Justice Arbel ruling:   "....the difficult reality the 
	  Bedouin population faces in the State of Israel requires a systemic, 
	  complete and comprehensive solution, and the sooner the better...The time 
	  has come to formulate and implement a truly comprehensive solution to this 
	  problem."   An earlier article addressed this issue, accessed 
	  through the following link:   
	  
	  http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/2007/09/unrecognized-palestinians_12.html 
	    It explained that Israeli Arabs live mainly in all-Arab towns and 
	  villages in three heartlands - the Galilee in the north; what's called the 
	  "Little Triangle" in the center along the Israeli side of the Green Line; 
	  and the Negev in the south.   Up to 150,000 Bedouin Arabs, Israeli 
	  citizens, live in so-called "unrecognized villages," mainly in the Galilee 
	  and Negev. They're unrecognized because their residents are considered 
	  internal refugees, forced from their homes during Israel's War of 
	  Independence and prevented from returning. Thereafter, they've been 
	  relentlessly mistreated, including by repressive zoning restrictions, 
	  prohibiting construction, agriculture, and other legal rights.   
	  They're also been denied essential services, including water, electricity, 
	  roads, transport, sanitation, education, healthcare, postal and telephone 
	  service, refuse removal and more because under Israel's Planning and 
	  Construction Law they're illegal. More recently, stepped up efforts to 
	  demolish their homes and villages are dispossessing them, making way for 
	  Jewish development, much like what's ongoing throughout the West Bank and 
	  East Jerusalem.   Adalah and the other human rights organizations 
	  want it stopped. Negev Bedouins number around 80,000. After earlier 
	  concentrating them in the desert's eastern portion, a policy of reducing 
	  their living space began in the 1990s. Today, Israel wants to remove as 
	  many as possible, disregarding their basic rights.   Since 1948, 
	  Israeli master plans completely ignored the unrecognized villages, denying 
	  their residents rights afforded Jews. The ongoing injustice continues 
	  relentlessly, today pursuing a policy of destroying entire villages, 
	  forcible displacements then following.   Examples include Al-Araqib. 
	  On July 27, 2010, at 4:30AM, the whole village was razed, its 45 homes 
	  demolished, illegal force used against men, women and children. Without 
	  warning, police stormed the village, wearing face masks and no IDs. Income 
	  Tax Authority representatives came with them, lawlessly seizing assets, 
	  purportedly to cover unverified debts.   The episode was appalling, 
	  leaving residents traumatized, their homes razed in front of their eyes, 
	  their possessions seized, and no alternative housing provided. After 
	  rebuilding four times, authorities again destroyed them.   Umm al-Hieran 
	  - Atir is home to about 1,100 Bedouins, evacuation and expulsion orders 
	  pending against them on grounds of trespassing. As a result, many village 
	  homes got demolition orders. Residents have lived there since 1956 after 
	  members of the Abu al-Qi'an tribe were expelled from Wadi Zuballa (today 
	  part of the Kibbutz Shoval). However, according to various master plans, 
	  part of their village is earmarked for a Jewish town to be called Hiran. 
	    Al-Sura is another example, situated on Al-Nasasra tribe land, 
	  predating Israel's creation. All village houses got demolition orders, 
	  their land to be stolen for industrial development excluding them.   
	  In August 2010, demolitions occurred in Jarabe, Abda, Abu al-Sulab, Al-Shihabi 
	  (Abu Tulul) and Baqurnub. There and in other villages, the practice has 
	  been longstanding. However, 2010 saw a dramatic rise, by early October 
	  destroying over 200 homes, properties and other possessions confiscated. 
	  Moreover, hundreds of olive trees were uprooted and agricultural crops 
	  destroyed.   More information can be found at the Negev Coexistence 
	  Forum's web site, accessed through the following link:   
	  
	  http://www.dukium.org/index.php?newlang=english   Israel's 
	  Lawless Disregard for Its Arab Minority   Home demolitions violate 
	  their legal rights to dignity, housing, health and life, mistreatment 
	  Israel Jews don't face. Loss of their homes also violates a Supreme Court 
	  ruling that the right to housing is part of their minimal subsistence. 
	  It's therefore part of their legal right to dignity.   In Preminger 
	  v. Mor (1997), Justice Strasberg-Cohen held that:   "human dignity 
	  is a fundamental constitutional value in our society. No one would dispute 
	  that it is necessary to safeguard a person's dignity even if he has failed 
	  or fallen into debt, and that he should not be left without a roof over 
	  his head."   In Ajouri v. Commander of IDF Forces in the West Bank 
	  (2002), the Court held that "A person's home is not only a roof over his 
	  head, but also a means for the physical and social location of the person, 
	  of his private life and social relations."   Moreover, since Bedouin 
	  life is especially harsh, authorities have an added responsibility to 
	  ensure shelter. In Commitment to Peace and Social Justice NGO v. The 
	  Minister of Finance (2005), the Court ruled that dignity included the 
	  right to minimal living conditions to ensure protection for human life. As 
	  such, the state is duty bound to care for those with meager means. Retired 
	  Chief Justice Barak ruled:   "The basic laws protect the right to 
	  dignity, including the aspect of material subsistence required for the 
	  exercise of (this right). From this viewpoint, (that entails) the right to 
	  conduct his normal life as a human being without his distress defeating 
	  him and bringing him to a state of intolerable impoverishment."   
	  International laws also affirm these rights, including the International 
	  Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. ICESCR's Article 11 
	  defines elements to adequate housing to include:   -- affordability, 
	  so that obtaining it doesn't jeopardize other essential needs;   -- 
	  a prohibition against discriminatory laws;   -- the right to 
	  privacy;   -- protection from arbitrary eviction;   -- 
	  accessibility to infrastructure and services, including health, education, 
	  and employment;   -- the right to choose residency locations; and 
	    -- to live in culturally adaptable housing.   Other 
	  international laws specify rights for women and children, and for 
	  authorities to assure them. Evicting Bedouin Arabs and demolishing the 
	  homes and villages, based on their nationality and religion, clearly 
	  violates their rights under Israeli and international law. Worse still, 
	  it's being done solely for Jewish development, showing contempt for Arab 
	  citizens, violating basic human rights and freedoms.   Jewish Hiran 
	  will replace Umm al-Hieran. Al-Araqib will be demolished for Givot Barr. 
	  In addition, individual Jewish settlements are being approved, some in 
	  violation of planning policy. For example, in July 2010, a Negev 
	  Development Authority Law amendment passed, recognizing Negev Jewish 
	  settlers, master plans for them to follow. As a result, Bedouin rights 
	  will be trashed, fundamental laws violated, even though as Dr. Sandy Kedar 
	  explains:   Negev Bedouins are a recognized indigenous minority, 
	  their historical existence and presence predating Israel's existence. 
	  Their land and property rights are indisputable. Israel's Basic Law 
	  affirms them, requiring authorities to protect them as well as other basic 
	  rights.   Israel's Or Commission, established in October 2000, 
	  recommended that Bedouin villages be recognized and developed, saying: 
	    "The land conflict has existed since the first days of the 
	  state....The Arab public strongly supports and identifies with the 
	  Bedouin's stance." Though Israeli citizens, their "villages are not 
	  recognized (and) have not been provided with infrastructure and 
	  services....The vast majority of residents of the unrecognized villages 
	  were required to move to a number of central towns that were planned for 
	  them....Several public associations have formed to" protect them." They 
	  deserve equitable conflict resolution.   In 2007, Israel's Housing 
	  and Construction minister appointed the Goldberg Committee to resolve this 
	  issue. On November 11, 2008, the Committee recommended that all Negev 
	  Bedouin villages be recognized. In addition, Bedouin citizens should be 
	  granted land ownership rights.   On January 18, 2009, authorities 
	  then approved Decision No. 4411, deciding that it "regards the outline 
	  proposed by the committee as a basis for resolving the settlement of the 
	  Bedouin in the Negev." Then, in June 2010, the "Investigator's 
	  Recommendations Regarding the Objections to District Master Plan 23-1404 - 
	  A Partial District Master Plan for the Beersheva Metropolitan Area" was 
	  published. It also recommended recognition.   In July 2010, the UN 
	  Human Rights Committee (HRC) issued its "Concluding Observations" on 
	  Israel's third periodic report, expressing concern about home demolitions 
	  and forced evictions. HRC called on Israel to respect Bedouin rights to 
	  their land and agricultural livelihoods on it.   The UN CERD 
	  Committee, responsible for monitoring the state's implementation of the 
	  International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial 
	  Discrimination expressed concern in June 2007 over Israeli violations, 
	  saying Bedouin village and land rights must be recognized.   In 
	  2005, the UN CEDAW Committee, responsible for monitoring states' 
	  implementation of the International Convention on the Elimination of All 
	  Forms of Discrimination Against Women expressed outrage over how Bedouin 
	  women were being treated.   In 2002, the UN CAT Committee, 
	  responsible for monitoring the state's implementation of the International 
	  Convention Against Torture (CAT), determined that Israel's home demolition 
	  and displacement policy constituted, in some cases, cruel, inhuman and 
	  degrading punishment, violating the statute.   Adalah attorney 
	  Sawsan Zaher asked the above addressed officials to halt their aggressive 
	  policies, replacing them with constructive dialogue for acceptable 
	  solutions. International and Israeli law demand it. As in the past on all 
	  Jewish/Muslim issues, they were unresponsive. As a result, Israeli 
	  lawlessness continues relentlessly, the rule of law a non-starter, Bedouin 
	  Arab citizens victimized like other Israeli Arabs and Occupied 
	  Palestinians, justice for them still denied.   Stephen Lendman lives 
	  in Chicago and can be reached at
	  lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. 
	  Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to 
	  cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive 
	  Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US 
	  Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived 
	  for easy listening.  http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/ 
	====================== 
	  Ethnically Cleansing East Jerusalem  
	  By Stephen Lendman 
	    Jerusalem is the epicenter of a decades long struggle. For Jews, 
	  it's politically important as their capital, a national and religious 
	  center, as well as symbolic of Judaism's revival and prominence. For 
	  Christians, it's where Jesus lived and died, and for Muslims, it's their 
	  third holiest site (the Dome of the Rock on the Temple Mount and Al-Aqsa 
	  Mosque) after Mecca's Sacred Mosque and the Mosque of the Prophet in 
	  Madina.   In June 1967, Israel occupied the city. On July 30, 1980, 
	  the Knesset introduced the Jerusalem Law, officially annexing it as 
	  Israel's unified capital. However, on March 1, 1980, UN Security Council 
	  Resolution 465 declared that:   "all measures taken by Israel to 
	  change the physical character, demographic composition, institutional 
	  structure or status of the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied 
	  since 1967, including Jerusalem, or any part thereof, have no legal 
	  validity and that Israel's policy and practices of settling parts of its 
	  population and new immigrants in those territories constitute a flagrant 
	  (Fourth Geneva) violation....and also constitute a serious obstruction to 
	  achieving a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East." 
	    On July 4, 2004, the International Court of Justice (ICC) ruled that 
	  "Israeli settlements in the Occupied Territory, including East Jerusalem, 
	  are illegal and an obstacle to peace and to economic and social 
	  development (and) have been established in breach of international law." 
	    However, nothing thereafter changed. Settlements expanded 
	  exponentially, including on stolen East Jerusalem land. Israel plans to 
	  Judaize it by replacing Arabs with Jews, law or no law, because unenforced 
	  ones are meaningless.   On November 7, Haaretz writer Nir Hasson 
	  headlined, "Full Haaretz expose/How the state helped right-wing groups 
	  settle East Jerusalem," saying:   Israel "used a controversial law 
	  to transfer East Jerusalem assets to the rightist organizations Elad and 
	  Ateret Cohanim without a tender, and at very low prices."   To date, 
	  Elad settled 500 Jews in 15 Silwan sites. Ateret Cohanim brought 60 Jewish 
	  families and hundreds of yeshiva students to the Old City's Muslim 
	  Quarter, an area they're determined to control.   In support, Israel 
	  transferred hundreds of assets to them, as well as millions of shekels for 
	  security, including surveillance cameras and fences that separate settlers 
	  from Palestinians. Authorities also licensed Elad to manage the historic 
	  City of David tourist site.   In 1992, the Knesset passed a law 
	  requiring all state agencies to hold public tenders on which any citizen 
	  may bid, with certain defined exemptions, including expanding agricultural 
	  areas and promoting tourism. However, Elad and Ateret Cohahim were 
	  "exempted from tender" for all 11 assets they got, authorities abusing the 
	  1950 Absentee Property Law to do it.   It pertains to persons "who, 
	  at any time during the period between (November 29, 1947) and (May 19, 
	  1948) ceased to exist," and no longer owned Israeli property legally. 
	  However, at least for some of the 11 seized assets, owners live in the 
	  West Bank, "which is not under the jurisdiction of Israeli law."   
	  Attorney Shlomo Lecker, involved in one of the cases, said: "These are not 
	  people who moved to an enemy country. Instead, these are cases in which 
	  we've decided to annex property without annexing the people who left it. 
	  Thus, two attorneys general recommended that this law not be applied to 
	  East Jerusalem."   Haaretz's full expose can be accessed through the 
	  following link:   
	  
	  http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/features/full-haaretz-expose-how-the-state-helped-right-wing-groups-settle-east-jerusalem-1.323312?localLinksEnabled=false&utm_source=Mondoweiss+List&utm_campaign=a19fb514b1-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email 
	    Ethnically Cleaning Silwan   Silwan is an Arab village adjacent 
	  to Jerusalem's Old City, extending along the Kidron Valley alongside the 
	  eastern slopes of Jabal al-Mukaber, another Arab community. Home to about 
	  45,000 people, it's one of 28 Palestinian villages incorporated into East 
	  Jerusalem.  For years, settler encroachment fueled controversy and 
	  conflict. So does the area's historical importance, archeology used for 
	  displacement to legitimize Jewish claims.    Excavations have 
	  already claimed large tracts of Silwan land. The militant right-wing 
	  settler group Elad, funded largely by US donors, controls them. Its web 
	  site tells its own version of history. It also conducts tours to convince 
	  visitors of its Jewish origin.   For their part, Palestinians are 
	  contesting, explaining their important history. Different versions fuel 
	  conflict, Haaretz writers Nir Hasson and Jonathan Lis, on October 12 
	  headlining, "Life in Silwan: Unbearable for Jews and Palestinians alike," 
	  saying:   "The pattern of Jewish settlement (there) is unlike 
	  anywhere else, with some 70 Jewish families (around 500 people) in 15 
	  locations, islands among tens of thousands of Palestinians. The resulting 
	  friction requires the presence of dozens of security guards and 
	  surveillance cameras."   Palestinians complain about their presence 
	  and heavy-handed police tactics. The Association of Civil Rights in Israel 
	  said settlers carry weapons, Jewish/Arab relations thus tense over 
	  shootings, deaths and arrests. Moreover, Palestinian homes are being 
	  demolished for planned parks, open spaces, restaurants, boutique hotels, 
	  and Jewish-only housing.   Al-Bustan is a Silwan neighborhood, 
	  across from the Jerusalem's Old City. Home to about 1,500 residents, 
	  they're threatened with displacement, the Municipality of Jerusalem 
	  claiming no permits were issued to build in areas designated for open 
	  space and a archeological park.   On February 22, 2009, they were 
	  ordered out in 72 hours to make way for expanding Israel's City of David 
	  archeological site, a Jewish heritage project involving removing 
	  Palestinians whose history goes back centuries. Residents contested their 
	  right to stay, the Al Bustan Popular Committee (BPC) working with lawyers 
	  in Israeli courts. Nonetheless, demolition orders are issued and in other 
	  city neighborhoods, part of Israel's systematic Judaization process.   
	  In October, police posted notices on five Al-Bustan homes, calling them 
	  illegal and subject to demolition. In addition, BPC's leader, Fakhri Abu 
	  Diab, said "a large force of Israeli border guards ransacked the area, 
	  using homes as vantage points to fire tear gas canisters, stun grenades, 
	  and rubber bullets in all directions" after protests broke out.   
	  Many Silwan homes have been demolished, many more threatened. Moreover, 
	  residents are regularly attacked, prompting protests and clashes. B'Tselem 
	  explained that East Jerusalem Palestinians face discriminatory housing and 
	  construction policies, forcing them to build without permits (on their own 
	  land), thereby subjecting them to demolitions. Protests, violence and 
	  arrests follow, children affected like adults.   On October 25, 
	  Palestine Monitor writer Charlotte Silver headlined, "Children The New 
	  Target In Silwan Ethnic Cleansing Campaign," saying:   Daily, 
	  "Jerusalem police and security forces have filled the streets of Silwan....patrolling 
	  (them) on foot and in cars. This past week alone," 23 residents were 
	  arrested, including at least six children, aged eight to 12. The charges 
	  are always the same - stone throwing, whether or not true. Yet they're 
	  arrested, detained, beaten, terrorized and tortured like adults. In some 
	  cases, serious injuries result, requiring hospitalization.   Defence 
	  for Children International/Palestine (DCI) Section Report   In 
	  October, DCI issued a Detention Bulletin headlined, "Mass arrests in 
	  Silwan, East Jerusalem," saying:   Information on the arrest of 17 
	  Silwan children was collected, "although lawyers and fieldworkers for 
	  DCI-Palestine estimate that the overall number of children arrested....in 
	  October is considerably higher."   In recent weeks, confrontations 
	  between Palestinians and settlers, their private security guards, and 
	  police escalated. Further tensions erupted over plans to displace Al-Bustan 
	  residents for a recreation park. Children are always affected. Hundreds 
	  are arrested annually, some as young as or younger than 12. Nearly always 
	  it's for stone throwing, yet they're detained in violation of Fourth 
	  Geneva's Article 76, requiring minors be given special treatment, besides 
	  other provisions to safeguard protected persons.   In October, 256 
	  children were arrested, aged 12 - 15. Prosecutions and detentions usually 
	  follow. Bara' R., aged 13, is typical. On October 13, he was arrested in 
	  Silwan for throwing stones.   "At around 5:00PM, (he) was standing 
	  in front of his sister's house with some friends when they were attacked 
	  by 10 men in plain clothes, who were apparently Israeli security forces. 
	  (He) then reports being dragged into a nearby mosque by the men. (They) 
	  started firing weapons and tear gas at people outside the mosque. Baha's 
	  hand were tied behind his back and his shirt was pulled up over his eyes 
	  to prevent him from seeing."   "A short time later, (he) was put in 
	  an Israeli military vehicle and kicked and slapped." He was then 
	  transferred to Al Mascobiyya interrogation center in Jerusalem for 
	  questioning. Baha confessed "because I was so terrified because they beat 
	  me when they arrested me and because I was alone in the interrogation 
	  room."   He was luckier than others. At 11:00PM, he was released and 
	  fined 5,000 shekels, about $1,400, a huge sum for poor Palestinians, 
	  perhaps too much to pay, meaning their property or possessions may be 
	  taken instead.   DCI/Palestine covered several other arrests. In all 
	  cases, children were accused of stone throwing. Their hands were painfully 
	  shackled behind their backs. They were dragged, beaten, forced to confess 
	  and sign documents in Hebrew, denied food, water and toilet privileges for 
	  long periods, and overall terrorized during interrogations. Some were 
	  fined and released, others detained.   On October 15, police and 
	  Silwan residents clashed. About 15 Palestinians were injured, including 
	  one child. Most were struck by rubber-coated bullets, able to cause 
	  injuries and at times kill.   "According to local sources, the 
	  confrontations took place after Israeli forces fired tear gas canisters at 
	  worshippers" during prayer time. Residents threw rocks in response. "In a 
	  related incident, Israeli border police officers physically assaulted and 
	  injured a man at a flying checkpoint erected at one of Silwan's 
	  entrances." He was taking his son to the hospital, suffering from pepper 
	  gas inhalation.    On October 23, DCI/Palestine sent a 14 page 
	  report to the EU Subcommittee on Human Rights on how Palestinian children 
	  are treated in detention. It highlighted "the continued use of 
	  ill-treatment and torture during the arrest and interrogation" process. 
	    Other information included:   -- international law violations;  
	    -- evidence that over 42% of children are held with adults;   
	  -- over half receive inadequate food, water and shelter;   -- most 
	  are denied family visits during the first three months of detention;   
	  -- telephone privileges are prohibited; and   -- most are subjected 
	  to torture and other forms of abuse.   A Final Comment   
	  Israel's long range Jerusalem plan is total Judaization, making the city 
	  its exclusive capital, denying the Palestinians rightful claim to its 
	  eastern portion for its own. As a result, ethnic cleansing systematically 
	  continues, villages like Silwan targeted by home demolitions, 
	  dispossessions, and assaults against residents defending their land and 
	  property.   In some ways they do it creatively. In 2008 for example, 
	  when 88 houses were ordered demolished for a City of David archeological 
	  park, residents erected a large tent for prayer, meetings, children's 
	  activities, and community events. In October, Jimmy Carter met with 
	  village leaders in it. Last year, the Wadi Hilwah Information Center was 
	  established to counter settler propaganda with its own historical 
	  narrative.   Determined, sustained, organized resistance is the best 
	  antidote to repression and injustice, what Palestinians have heroically 
	  done for decades, including the men, women, and children of Silwan.    
	  In her August 18, 2010 Palestine Monitor article, Elena Hogan's title 
	  described it metaphorically headlining, "When David Becomes Goliath." In 
	  fact, long struggles at times end that way. Why not in Silwan, in East 
	  Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza, occupation-free self-determination an 
	  achievable goal.   Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be 
	  reached at 
	  lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site at 
	  sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with 
	  distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive 
	  Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays 
	  at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.  http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/ 
	  
 
  
       
       | 
     | 
     
      
      
      
      
     |