Mission & Name
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
In the Zionist Entity, Law Makers and Public
Call to Outlaw Human Rights Organizations
By Adib S. Kawar
Al-Jazeerah: CCUN, May 31, 2010
“Promised Land”-- news and opinion from Israel – Ma’ariv (p. 12)
by Arik Bender, wrote an article dated April 29th 2010 entitled
Knesset moves to outlaw
human rights organizations in Israel, “Something very troubling is
happening to “the only democracy in the Middle East.”
“More than 20 MKs, including members of opposition party Kadima, proposed
a new bill which will make it possible to outlaw the important human rights
groups in Israel. Among the organizations mentioned in the proposed bill are
Doctors for Human
rights, The Coalition
of Woman for Peace, The
Public Committee against Torture in Israel, and
Adalah: the Legal Center for
Arab Minority Rights. All these organizations receive funds from the New
The article proceeded saying: “According to a report in
Maariv, the new bill will outlaw any organization “which is involved in
activity intended to lead to the prosecution or arrest of IDF officers and
government officials for war crimes.” the word “involved” makes it a
very broad definition.”
Note the phrase with which the article was started with: “Something very
troubling is happening to “the only democracy in the Middle East”. Isn’t
this more than true? More than probably it is yes, when we see that more
than 20 MKs (The “Israeli Knesset” (which is the “Israeli parliament” ,
“proposed a new bill which will make it possible to outlaw the important
human rights groups in Israel”, and more than half of those who are
considered “Israeli” citizenship support limiting and cubing activities of
Human Rights organizations!
So what is left of democracy if the
activities of human rights organizations are limited, curbed and
illegitimated, especially in what is claimed to be the only democracy in a
whole region and a central part of the world?
We mean the rights of
the occupied people by a certain group of people, or taking the liberty by
the occupier to curb liberty of expression and human rights as a whole,
denial of free movement of the occupied citizens, occupy and steal land
other kinds of property and/or take the lives of the occupied people by any
sort of assassination and not to forget demolishing or occupying property of
Palestinian Arabs and throw their residents in the street to be replaced by
Zionist racist invaders.
We mean in an entity that death penalty by
its courts is banned against its citizens, but its executive body, and its
elected juridical body including its supreme court of justice, the highest
judicial body and permits its executive body to turn around law to permit
assassination by its armed forces whether internal or external, which means
if death penalty is not permitted by law against the entity’s first class
citizens belonging to a certain religious faith, which the state is claimed
to be its, but it could be imposed on other categories of citizens and
occupied non-citizens who belong to other religious faiths and ethnicities.
We mean this entity which permits itself to threaten its neighbors
in Arab and non-Arab states and resistance forces to punish them just
because they dare to arm themselves to enable them to defend their
sovereignty with effective arms and weapons, because this simply “break the
existing balance of power with an illegal entity” that uprooted a whole
population from its ancestral homeland, an entity that owns a formidable
conventional and unconventional arsenals of arms and weapons. These arsenals
that allowed this rogue entity to wage an unending series of wars and terror
operations against the indigenous population of the land it occupied and
replaced them, as well as threatening its Arab neighbors and far away
non-Arab and non-neighboring countries with demolition and destruction, just
because they want to develop their lands and strengthen their citizens.
We mean this entity that issues an order it calls No 132 by the strength of
which it is legal to put infants on trial and imprison them.
public opinion poll that the “Israeli” daily Haaretz, published that the
majority of Jews in occupied Palestine wants to curb the activities of human
rights organizations, and punish those who uncover unethical and illegal
military activities and punish the press that published information about
We mean what came out of a poll results published by the daily
newspaper Haaretz published in the Zionist entity that shows how
undemocratic and un-respectful to human rights is the Zionist entity of
“Israel”, whether it is the public or the governmental bodies executive,
judicial and legislative.
We mean in this entity where prisoners
of war who count about 8000 in the prisons and detention camps of Zionist
occupation they suffer catastrophic health conditions and health care that
is almost unavailable, and in most cases harmful for health if not deadly,
which the occupation authorities present to them to achieve certain special
aims. Reports said that in addition to that Zionist doctors practice various
types of torture against the prisoners of war, and make of them, as said,
doctors use them for experiments for “Israeli” pharmaceutical companies.
Also proved reports said that the Zionist entity and those belonging to it
steal organs of Palestinian Arab martyrs and sell to trade with them.
This poll showed that a majority of the Jewish inhabitants of occupied
Palestine are Zionist by all means of the word, and not simply people who
belong to the Jewish faith and respect human rights and human dignity
irrespective of their religious faith or ethnicity.
poll results exposed the racism of the vast majority of Jewish faith
inhabitants though many of them presence in occupied Palestine in illegal
The poll said that the vast majority of “Israelis” want to curb or at
least support limiting activities of Human Rights organizations, punish who
uncover unethical and illegal military actions and bar the press from
publishing anything about that.
The poll said that 58% of
those canvassed said human rights organization should not be allowed to
uncover unethical “Israeli” practices and to practice their activities
freely, while 51% said that there is more excessive freedom of
expression then necessary in “Israel”.
56% said that that
“Israelis” who support punishing the “Jewish state” or boycotting it should
themselves be punished.
73% support to severely punishing
journalists who publish reports that uncover information about unethical and
illegal activities committed by the “Israeli” army and/or the )Shabak(.
64% see that the “Israeli” press should not be allowed to publish reports
that security bodies consider to cause danger to public security.
42% said “Israelis” should not be allowed to publish reports of Palestinian
sources, which puts the army in a negative position, even if it was proved
to be correct.