Al-Jazeerah History  
	 
	
	
	Archives  
	 
	
	
	Mission & Name   
	 
	
	
	
	Conflict Terminology   
	 
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	
	Gaza Holocaust   
	 
	
	Gulf War   
	 
	
	Isdood  
	 
	
	Islam   
	 
	
	News   
	 
	
	
	News Photos 
	  
	 
	
	
	Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)   
	 
	
	www.aljazeerah.info
	  
      
       
      
        
        
     | 
     | 
    
     
	Alternative Reading of the Al-Mabhouh Murder
	 
	By Ramzy Baroud  
	Al-Jazeerah & ccun.org, March 15, 2010 
         The killing of Palestinian activist Mahmoud al-Mabhouh on 
	  January 19, 2010 was clearly a well-planned, violent and sadistic act, 
	  committed by Israeli assassins in the supposed safety of a sovereign 
	  country.    Yes, Mahmoud al-Mabhouh was a Palestinian activist. We 
	  have no reason to believe otherwise. He spent years of his life in Israeli 
	  prison – and one year in an Egyptian jail – for his political activism. 
	  This, however, gives no credibility to Israel’s accusation that al-Mabhouh 
	  was a killer of Israelis. This assertion becomes even more problematic 
	  when considering that al-Mabhouh’s assassination was, according to British 
	  media, ordered by accused Israeli war criminals and rightwing politicians. 
	    According to the Sunday Times, Meir Dagan, the current director of 
	  Mossad briefed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the 
	  assassination plan during a meeting in early January.  "The people of 
	  Israel trust you. Good luck," Netanyahu reportedly said at the end of this 
	  meeting.    It is disgraceful enough that the assassins used 
	  ‘fraudulent’ European passports, as well as credit cards linked to an 
	  American bank to carry out their plans. But more upsetting is the fact 
	  that this cruel and calculated action has inspired little more than 
	  expressions of ‘outrage’. Have we become this resigned to Israeli 
	  impunity?    What about the sanctity of life, the sovereignty of 
	  nations and the respect for international law? Are these immediately 
	  disposable when the victim is Palestinian and the location of the crime an 
	  Arab country?   Al-Mabhouh has also been callously deprived of his 
	  own relevance to the story. We don’t really know much about the man aside 
	  from what Israeli wants us to know – a senior Hamas operative who was 
	  responsible for the abduction and killings of two Israeli soldiers; one of 
	  the founders of the militant arm of Hamas, Izz al-Din al-Qassam; the 
	  middleman between Hamas in Gaza and al-Quds Force of the Revolutionary 
	  Guard in Iran.    Who has weaved this fascinatingly reductionist 
	  account of al-Mabhouh’s life in such a short span of time? His family? 
	  Hamas? The Palestinian media? No, none of these. The creator of this 
	  biography is Israel, the very country that assassinated him. Now that is 
	  truly outrageous: the murderer writes and convinces the world of the story 
	  of the murder victim. And the media gladly runs with it.    
	  Expectedly, a Palestinian would tell al-Mabhouh’s story in entirely 
	  different terms. He was born in Jabalia, one of Gaza’s poorest and most 
	  crowded refugee camps. These key words alone – Gaza, poor, crowded, 
	  refugee - helps to unravel the real story of al-Mabhouh. It is the story 
	  shared by so many people who still live a life of utter anguish, poverty 
	  and resistance in the Gaza Strip – and elsewhere - which is under inhumane 
	  siege and successive wars by the world’s fourth strongest army. The story 
	  is not about abducted occupation soldiers, but about millions of refugees, 
	  not about Iran, but about Gaza and Palestine, not about luxury hotels, but 
	  about horrifyingly desolate refugee camps.   But Palestinians – like 
	  many oppressed peoples around the world – have no right to their own 
	  narrative. Their story is negligible, if not wholly irrelevant. Israel 
	  commits the murder, Israel offers the explanation, and eventually Israel 
	  gets away with both the crime and the lie. Al-Mabhouh’s murder might 
	  eventually inspire several documentaries that highlight the murderous 
	  nature of Palestinian militants, and the unequalled brilliance of Israeli 
	  retaliation. Another Steven Spielberg’s Munich might already be in the 
	  making. The first scene of this would not be al-Mabhouh’s family forced to 
	  flee their village in Palestinian after untold butchery by Zionist 
	  militants in 1948. Instead it might show a dark-skinned, menacing 
	  Palestinian slaughtering two helpless Israeli soldiers pleading for their 
	  lives.    We are, more or less, told to forget about al-Mabhouh. 
	  After all, his name is used along with Hamas and Iran in the same 
	  sentence. That should be enough to tell us that his life is dispensable - 
	  just like the lives of over 1,400 Palestinians who were killed by the 
	  Israeli army in Gaza between December 2008 and January 2009. Israel may 
	  well be preparing for yet another attack on the impoverished Strip. The 
	  tunnels that represent the lifeline for the vast majority of Palestinians 
	  in Gaza are being routinely blown up by Israeli warplanes, detonated by 
	  dynamites and blocked by an Egyptian steel wall. Gazans cannot be allowed 
	  any weapons to defend themselves either. The ‘international community’ has 
	  held many meetings to ensure that no weapons find their way to Gaza. The 
	  US in particular is utterly firm regarding this issue - although not at 
	  all firm about ensuring that food or medicine reach the Strip. Al-Mabhouh 
	  may have been killed due to Israel’s belief he was arming the resistance. 
	  This partly explains why the ‘international community’ is not at all moved 
	  by the murder. Al-Mabhouh might have been involved in breaking the Western 
	  consensus on denying Gaza both food and arms.    The EU is only 
	  worried about its link to the story, and not the murder itself. An EU 
	  statement issued in Brussels on February 22 condemned the “fact that those 
	  involved in this action used fraudulent EU member-states passports.” They 
	  didn’t name Israel though. As the Financial Times resolved, “criticism of 
	  Israel was as strongly worded as the EU could manage, given that Germany, 
	  Italy and several other countries place great emphasis on close relations 
	  with Israel.”    One can only imagine what would happen if Hamas 
	  decides to strike back, expanding the battleground from Gaza to the rest 
	  of the world. Would the EU express disapproval of Hamas’ use of fraudulent 
	  passport, but then refrain from actually naming the group - due to a fear, 
	  say, of upsetting Muslim countries?    No. But when the victim is a 
	  Palestinian and the murderers are Israelis – 27 of them so far – it’s an 
	  entirely different story, and an entirely different concept of justice. 
	    - Ramzy Baroud (www.ramzybaroud.net) 
	  is an internationally-syndicated columnist and the editor of 
	  PalestineChronicle.com. His latest book is "My Father Was a Freedom 
	  Fighter: Gaza's Untold Story" (Pluto Press, London), now available on 
	  Amazon.com. 
       
       | 
     | 
     
      
      
      
      
     |