Al-Jazeerah History  
	 
	
	
	Archives  
	 
	
	
	Mission & Name   
	 
	
	
	
	Conflict Terminology   
	 
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	
	Gaza Holocaust   
	 
	
	Gulf War   
	 
	
	Isdood  
	 
	
	Islam   
	 
	
	News   
	 
	
	
	News Photos 
	  
	 
	
	
	Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)   
	 
	
	www.aljazeerah.info
	  
      
       
      
        
        
     | 
     | 
    
       
	What If Iran Had Carried Out the Gaza Carnage?
	 
	By Kourosh Ziabari 
	Al-Jazeerah, ccun.org, June 7, 2010 
	 It's not unjustifiable to consider Israel as the absolute incarnation 
	of fraudulence, relentlessness and brutality. Since its establishment, the 
	Zionist regime has carried out actions which contravene the international 
	regulations and cancel out the human rights in a way or another. Only a 
	brief look into the account of Israel's bloody interaction with the 
	Palestinian people over the past years shows us that this fabricated regime 
	does not deserve "the right of existence", as the U.S. and European 
	officials put it periodically.    The Monday assault of the Israel 
	Defense Forces into the flotilla of humanitarian aids which was heading to 
	the besieged Gaza Strip from Turkey left at least 10 dead and several other 
	wounded. Never mind that Israel's criminal action violated the 4th Geneva 
	1949 Convention. Just imagine for a single moment that Iran had carried out 
	the carnage instead of Israel. Simply replace the two names and then read 
	the news as reported by CNN: "The Free Gaza Movement, one of the organizers 
	of the aid, said that Israeli commandos dropped from a helicopter onto the 
	deck of one of the ships early Monday and immediately opened fire on unarmed 
	civilians."    Since September 2000, Israel killed more than 6,300 
	Palestinians, most of whom were children and defenseless civilians. Israel 
	has also demolished more than 25,000 Palestinian homes since 1967. It 
	possess up to 200 nuclear warheads in violation of the United Nations 
	Security Council resolution 487. Interestingly, it receives something around 
	$7 million of military aid from the U.S. per day. 7,383 Palestinians are 
	being kept in the prisons of Israel. The racist regime of Israel has built 
	223 settlements on the Palestinians' confiscated lands. Over the six-year 
	period between September 2000 and February 2006, 36589 Palestinians were 
	injured by the Israeli forces of whom 3530 Palestinians were permanently 
	disabled or maimed. Shockingly, this six-year period was witness to the 
	confiscation of 249680 km2 of Palestinian lands. Israeli forces even refused 
	to overlook the Palestinian trees as they uprooted 1,187,762 Palestinian 
	trees from 2000 to 2006. This shows the nature of the brutal regime of 
	Israel which is even at odds with the natural resources and trees, let alone 
	the human beings.   Although it's practically unthinkable, try to 
	replace Iran and Israel, imagining for a single moment that Iran is the 
	occupying state that kills at least two foreign civilians a day, beleaguers 
	some 1.5 million people who don't have any access to the barest rudiments of 
	their daily life and live under the continual threats of military assault 
	and are in dire need of humanitarian assistance. Would the so-called 
	international community tolerate it? Would the UN Secretary General suffice 
	to a simple "expression of concern" with regards to such an incessant 
	viciousness, if it had not been Israel?    To be honest with 
	ourselves, Israel is enjoying an unconditional impunity from all of the 
	international rules, laws and regulations and acts like an autonomous state 
	which does not come in terms with any obligation and responsibility. After 
	the dissolution of South Africa's apartheid regime, which was recently 
	revealed to have had a nuclear deal with Tel Aviv in 1957, Israel is the 
	only apartheid entity which remains on the face of the world map and the 
	unyielding supports of the superpowers holds up this flimsy existence at any 
	rate.    United States and its European allies never gave in their 
	supports to the Israel and backed the felonies of Tel Aviv even in the most 
	crucial pivots, such as the Operation Cast Lead of the September 2008 – 
	January 2009 which led to the termination of Israel's diplomatic relations 
	with four countries: Venezuela, Bolivia, Qatar and Mauritania.    
	Anyway, the international reactions to the latest brutality of Israel in a 
	pre-dawn attacking to the civilians asleep in a humanitarian aids flotilla 
	which included 700 peace activists from different nationalities was 
	expectable and at the same time, unpardonably deplorable.    The 
	Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper who has several times attacked Iran 
	over its nuclear program has simply expressed his regret over the deaths and 
	injuries which "occurred", shrugging off to the responsibility of the 
	atrocious perpetrator and the architect of the massacre. "Canada deeply 
	regrets the loss of life and the injuries suffered. We are currently looking 
	for more information in order to shed light on what exactly happened." The 
	ridiculous statement of the Canadian Premier reads. Canada is still looking 
	for information about what has happened! Maybe the Israel Defense Force can 
	answer the questions well! "They had not coordinated with us as to the 
	shipping of humanitarian aids into Gaza, so we shot them killed in the 
	morning."    The reaction of the other countries was not something of 
	more value. Some of them summoned the Israeli ambassadors for 
	clarifications, some of them regretted the death of civilians and 
	sympathized with the families of the dead, some of them expressed their 
	"serious concern" over the happening and the rest remained indifferent as 
	the Israeli officials gave their strong backing to the massacre, leaving 
	thousands of unanswered questions and bunches of ambiguity regarding the 
	modality of international relations which make a fabricated state such as 
	Israel so guaranteed and impervious to international regulations that nobody 
	can stop it.    The NPT 2010 review conference in which 189 countries 
	unanimously called on Israel to put its nuclear activities and facilities 
	under the comprehensive IAEA safeguards was similarly responded arrogantly 
	by Tel Aviv: We are not NPT signatory and thus we don't need its 
	supervision, we want to possess our nuclear weapons to use them whenever 
	necessary!   Anyway, the "international community" which in the most 
	cases comprises the United States and its European friends who gave birth to 
	this inauspicious child should tolerate the consequences of the great 
	mistake they made 60 years ago. From the very beginning, it was clear that 
	the establishment of the regime of Israel would be tantamount to insecurity, 
	anxiety and disorder in the Middle East. Now Israel is expanding the 
	frontiers of its aggressiveness and one can easily foresee the days when the 
	European and American civilians are massacred by the Zionist regime, a 
	simple instance of which we witnessed in the flotilla case.    Again, 
	I'm thinking of the same question. What would happen if Iran, my country, 
	had carried out such a vicious action? The country which has never attacked 
	nor occupied any lands over the past 100 years; the country which has never 
	killed any foreign civilian under fallacious pretexts; would it have been 
	treated the same way as Israel?     
       
       | 
     | 
     
      
      
      
      
     |