Al-Jazeerah History
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion
Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
www.aljazeerah.info
|
|
The Futility of UNSC Resolutions Against Iran
By Kourosh Ziabari
Al-Jazeerah: CCUN, June 14, 2010
Although the United Nations Security Council, which some
politicians believe is one of the most undemocratic organizations in the
world, voted in favor of a fourth round of sanctions against Iran over its
uranium enrichment program, the global public opinions are well aware of the
fact that 15 countries, 5 of which are entitled to remain in an
unquestionable monopoly and dominance, cannot in reality represent the
interests of the international community. The Security Council,
which since its establishment has made discriminatory decisions against the
world countries, especially the non-aligned nations who typically try to
escape from the hegemony of superpowers, is notorious for its habitual
exercise of double standards and it's clear to everyone that its resolutions
are more often than not futile, ineffective, biased and unbinding.
Since 1948, the Security Council has adopted 223 resolutions in condemnation
of Israel's violations of international law, including the occupation of
Palestinian lands, unilateral incursions into the Lebanese and Syrian soils,
developing nuclear weapons, deporting the Palestinian citizens from their
homes and building illegal settlements in the West Bank. Interestingly, the
Israeli regime did not pay attention to any of these resolutions and the
UNSC never pursued its demands to hold Tel Aviv accountable for its
continued, flagrant defiance of international regulations. For
instance, the UNSC resolution 487 demanded Israel to put its nuclear
facilities under the comprehensive safeguards of the International Atomic
Energy Agency (IAEA). Israel never heeded the call and the UNSC never sued
Israel for its inattentiveness to the resolution. As another
example, the Security Council adopted six consequent resolutions in the wake
of 1982 Lebanon War, calling on Israel to cease its military activities and
withdraw its forces from the Lebanese territory, but Israel refused to
accept the resolutions until the resolution 517 was adopted in which Tel
Aviv was strongly censured for its failure to obey the UNSC resolutions
since March 1982. The criminal state of Israel, since its
establishment, attacked all of its neighboring countries on various
occasions and incited UNSC resolutions; however, these resolutions never
went beyond political statements which were the least spontaneous reactions
to Israel's brutality in the Middle East. On March 21, 1968, Israel fought
the Battle of Karameh by attacking the Karameh district of Jordan, killing
40 to 84 Jordanians and 100 to 200 Palestinians. The massive attacked was
followed by UNSC resolution 248 in which the "flagrant violation of the UN
Charter" was strongly condemned by all of the UNSC members, even the United
States; however, this verbal condemnation was the sole reaction of the
Security Council to Israel's violence. In December 1968, Israel
Defense Forces raided the Beirut International Airport, destroying 13
civilian airplanes belonging to Lebanon's national flag-carrier Middle East
Airlines. The assault was followed by UNSC resolution 262 which condemned
Israel once again. The resolution cautioned Israel to retreat from repeating
such actions to avoid being punished more severely; however, the further
steps never were taken, even when Israel repeated the same criminal actions.
In 1985, Israel staged an air raid on Tunisia to target the Palestinian
Liberation Organization headquarters in the country. The resolution
condemned Israel and demanded that Tel Aviv refrain from further such
attacks. It also noted that Tunisia had the right to repatriations
considering the loss of life and material damage caused. Having
killed thousands of civilians since its creation, the criminal record of
Israeli regime is clear to the world and every conscious man testifies that
this brutal regime deserves the strongest measures to be taken against.
United Nations Security Council never went beyond propagandistic
declarations regarding the unlawful and inhuman actions of Tel Aviv, its
killing of innocent civilians and violation of international humanitarian
law. If it were not the pressure of international community, UNSC even would
have not issued these flimsy and ineffective resolutions against Israel.
UNSC never passed any resolution to impose sanctions against Israel
even though the transgressions and felonies of Israel are so blatant and
conspicuous that nobody can deny the claim that Israel is the most violence
and vicious regime in the world, an identical and indistinguishable
duplicate of the apartheid regime of South Africa. The recent
resolution of the Security Council against Iran was a clear exercise of
double standards by this prejudiced international body and should be
answered by the Islamic Republic of Iran categorically. The hypocritical
stance of China and Russia regarding Iran's nuclear program and the
astounding accompaniment of independent nations such as Gabon, Nigeria,
Uganda, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mexico with the fallacious, deceptive
trajectory of the big 5 leave no room for the continued diplomacy and
peaceful interaction by Iran. Iran has so far demonstrated a
constructive and productive cooperation with IAEA, G5+1 and European Union,
keeping all the doors open for negotiation and reconciliation; however, the
time for diplomacy has come to an end. Now that the coalition of
superpowers, including China and Russia, have taken a confrontational stance
against Iran and want to go through a unilateralistic path, Iran should
change its tactic and one of the best solutions it can adopt is to withdraw
from IAEA. If Pakistan, India and Israel can enjoy international impunity to
develop nuclear weapons simply because they are not IAEA signatories, Iran
can have equally the right to progress its peaceful nuclear program by
withdrawing from a treaty which had ratified voluntarily.
|
|
|