Al-Jazeerah History  
	 
	
	
	Archives  
	 
	
	
	Mission & Name   
	 
	
	
	
	Conflict Terminology   
	 
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	
	Gaza Holocaust   
	 
	
	Gulf War   
	 
	
	Isdood  
	 
	
	Islam   
	 
	
	News   
	 
	
	
	News Photos 
	  
	 
	
	
	Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)   
	 
	
	www.aljazeerah.info
	  
      
       
      
        
        
     | 
     | 
    
     
       Iraq War Whistleblower, David Kelly, Was 
	Probably Assassinated 
  By Christopher King 
	Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, July 27, 2010 
	Dr David Kelly’s postmortem report must be released  
	
  Christopher King calls on Britain’s coalition government to 
	release the postmortem report – so far kept secret – on the death of Iraq 
	war whistleblower and UN weapons inspector David Kelly, who allegedly 
	committed suicide but is suspected of having been murdered by US or Israeli 
	agents.
  Ken Clarke and Dominic Grieve, respectively Britain’s 
	new secretary of state for justice and attorney-general, have had time to 
	settle into their chairs and start looking for things that need repairing 
	after the disastrous Blair-Brown government.
  One of the first things 
	to settle is the death of the UN weapons inspector in Iraq, Dr David Kelly, 
	who was hounded by the Blair government for correctly saying that its 
	propaganda in selling the Iraq war was “sexed up”. He was then found dead 
	near his home, having allegedly committed suicide. The circumstances are 
	suspicious and his postmortem report is secret.
  At the present time I 
	and a lot of other people are disposed to believe that he was assassinated, 
	probably by the Americans or Israelis. If there’s no coverup, why did the 
	Blair-Brown government seal the details of his death for 70 years? I
	wrote about this 
	two months ago and there have been many calls for openness since Dr Kelly’s 
	death. Suspicion of an assassination coverup is not going away. In January 
	this year, Lord Hutton claimed that the postmortem report on Dr Kelly was 
	available but no independent person has seen it yet. Doctors who have asked 
	for it have been refused.
  It’s worth reading the
	piece in the Independent by Tom 
	Mangold who says that anyone who believes that Dr Kelly was murdered must 
	also believe in the tooth fairy. This gentleman claims some sort of 
	acquaintanceship with Dr Kelly, although not friendship, despite the 
	Independent’s sub-title to this story. Mai Pederson, a lady who was a 
	friend, believes that he was murdered. 
	Until about a year ago I believed the suicide story. That is no longer 
	possible however, either for me or Mr Mangold. “The facts of Dr Kelly’s 
	death are contained in his postmortem report. I, along with many other 
	people, want to know what is in it.” As Tom Mangold is an investigative 
	journalist he will be familiar with the material about the Kelly affair. It 
	is therefore incomprehensible that he does not give weight to the first of 
	two critical factors that cast doubt on the government’s story and does not 
	mention the second: The government’s refusal to make Dr Kelly’s 
	postmortem report public  A group of seven medical practitioners has
	publicly stated that 
	it was “highly improbable” that Dr Kelly died from the severed ulnar artery 
	that Lord Hutton gave as the cause of his death.  Mr Mangold tells us 
	what he “believes” about this case. Belief has no objective value. Anthony 
	Blair, for example, believes to this day that he was right in getting rid of 
	Saddam Hussein, although to do so he played a leading role in killing a 
	million Iraqis, created four or five million refugees and devastated the 
	country in the invasion that Dr Kelly opposed. Men have an infinite capacity 
	to deceive themselves in their beliefs – and then attempt to deceive others. 
	We need facts. "The government constantly reduces our privacy on the 
	basis that if we are innocent of wrong-doing we have nothing to hide. So 
	will our new government continue to hide the facts?” The facts of Dr 
	Kelly’s death are contained in his post-mortem report. I, along with many 
	other people, want to know what is in it. Nor is Mr Mangold a medical 
	practitioner. If seven medical doctors state that it is extremely unlikely 
	that anyone can die from a severed ulnar artery, it is very close to a fact 
	that Dr Kelly’s death was not from this cause and is good enough to justify 
	their request for release of his postmortem report – which should not be 
	secret in any case. The government constantly reduces our privacy on the 
	basis that if we are innocent of wrong-doing we have nothing to hide. So 
	will our new government continue to hide the facts? Let us not complicate 
	matters at this point with yet another public inquiry. The situation is very 
	simple. Seven well qualified doctors have formally asked the 
	attorney-general to make the postmortem report available to them. The 
	government should let them see it. No good reason has ever been given for 
	its secrecy and none can be envisaged.
  Delay means that conspiracy 
	theories proliferate. There has recently been a
	report that Dr Kelly’s dental 
	records were stolen and then replaced around the time of his death. Dental 
	records are important in matters of identification. Does this mean that 
	there might be doubt about the identity of the body that is described in the 
	postmortem report under Dr Kelly’s name? Of course, delay assists a coverup 
	by making investigations more difficult.
  This matter is a 
	straightforward test of the Cameron-Clegg government’s honesty which needs 
	to be established following the lies and deceit of the Brown-Blair 
	government. On the record of our politicians’ vote for the illegal Iraq war, 
	it is no longer possible to accept any government as honest until proven 
	deceitful.
  Having been elected on a platform of support for the 
	Afghanistan-Pakistan war, the successor to the Iraq war and with as little 
	legitimacy, this government’s credentials have been
	poor from the beginning. 
	Unhappily they are unlikely to improve. Judging by our “unapologetic 
	pro-American” prime minister’s recent acceptance of the UK’s “junior 
	parnership” to the United States, by his
	statement in the Wall Street 
	Journal, we may expect the Cameron-Clegg government to continue to support 
	US aggressive warfare, kidnapping, torture and assassination world-wide as 
	well as the misuse of the UK’s armed forces in war crimes. To what end? 
	Whatever our politicians’ reasons they have nothing to do with the best 
	interests of the UK and its citizens. Particularly if the assassination of a 
	UK citizen on UK territory might be part of this “special relationship” of 
	fawning subservience.
  Its abandonment of international law and 
	unashamed, open practice of assassination is good reason to make the United 
	States the prime suspect in the death of Dr Kelly. Christopher King is a 
	retired consultant and lecturer in management and marketing. He lives in 
	London, UK.
  
	  
	  
       
       | 
     | 
     
      
      
      
      
     |