Al-Jazeerah History  
	 
	
	
	Archives  
	 
	
	
	Mission & Name   
	 
	
	
	
	Conflict Terminology   
	 
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	
	Gaza Holocaust   
	 
	
	Gulf War   
	 
	
	Isdood  
	 
	
	Islam   
	 
	
	News   
	 
	
	
	News Photos 
	  
	 
	
	
	Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)   
	 
	
	www.aljazeerah.info
	  
      
       
      
        
        
     | 
     | 
    
     
      Netanyahu Video Showing How Israeli Leaders 
	  Control US Presidents Through the Israel Lobby  
	By Jonathan Cook 
	  
	The Netanyahu video  
	 Ma'an, 19/07/2010 12:54 
	There is one video Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, must 
	be praying never gets posted on YouTube with English subtitles. To date, the 
	10-minute segment has been broadcast only in Hebrew on Israel’s Channel 10. 
	 Its contents, however, threaten to gravely embarrass not only Netanyahu 
	but also the US administration of Barack Obama.
  The film was shot, 
	apparently without Netanyahu’s knowledge, nine years ago, when the 
	government of Ariel Sharon had started re-invading the main cities of the 
	West Bank to crush Palestinian resistance in the early stages of the second 
	intifada.
  At the time Netanyahu had taken a short break from politics 
	but was soon to join Sharon’s government as finance minister.
  On a 
	visit to the settlement of Ofra in the West Bank to pay condolences to the 
	family of a man killed in a Palestinian shooting attack, he makes a series 
	of unguarded admissions about his first period as prime minister, from 1996 
	to 1999.
  Seated on a sofa in the house, he tells the family that he 
	deceived the US president of the time, Bill Clinton, into believing he was 
	helping implement the Oslo accords, the US-sponsored peace process between 
	Israel and the Palestinians, by making minor withdrawals from the West Bank 
	while actually entrenching the occupation. He boasts that he thereby 
	destroyed the Oslo process.
  He dismisses the 
	US as “easily moved to the right direction” and calls high levels of popular 
	American support for Israel "absurd."
  He also suggests that, 
	far from being defensive, Israel’s harsh military repression of the 
	Palestinian uprising was designed chiefly to crush the Palestinian Authority 
	led by Yasser Arafat so that it could be made more pliable for Israeli 
	diktats.
  All of these claims have obvious parallels with the current 
	situation, when Netanyahu is again Israel’s prime minister facing off with a 
	White House trying to draw him into a peace process that runs counter to his 
	political agenda.
  As before, he has ostensibly made public 
	concessions to the US administration -- chiefly by agreeing in principle to 
	the creation of a Palestinian state, consenting to indirect talks with the 
	leadership in Ramallah, and implementing a temporary freeze on settlement 
	building.
  But he has also enlisted the 
	powerful pro-Israel lobby to exert pressure on the White House, 
	which appears to have relented on its most important stipulations.
  
	The contemptuous view of Washington Netanyahu demonstrates in the film will 
	confirm the suspicions of many observers -- including Palestinian leaders -- 
	that his current professions of good faith should not be taken seriously. 
	 Critics have already pointed out that his gestures have been extracted 
	only after heavy arm-twisting from the US administration.
  More 
	significantly, he has so far avoided engaging meaningfully in the limited 
	talks the White House is promoting with the Palestinians while the pace of 
	settlement building in the West Bank has been barely affected by the 
	10-month freeze, due to end in September.
  In the meantime, planning 
	officials have repeatedly approved large new housing projects in East 
	Jerusalem and the West Bank that have undercut the negotiations and will 
	make the establishment of a Palestinian state -- viable or otherwise -- far 
	less likely.
  Writing in the liberal Haaretz newspaper, the columnist 
	Gideon Levy called the video "outrageous." He said it proved that
	Netanyahu was a "con artist … who thinks that 
	Washington is in his pocket and that he can pull the wool over its eyes." 
	He added that the prime minister had not reformed in the intervening period: 
	“Such a crooked way of thinking does not change over the years.”
  In 
	the film, Netanyahu says Israel must inflict “blows [on the Palestinians] 
	that are so painful the price will be too heavy to be borne … A broad attack 
	on the Palestinian Authority, to bring them to the point of being afraid 
	that everything is collapsing”.
  When asked if 
	the US will object, he responds: “America is something that can be easily 
	moved. Moved to the right direction … They won’t get in our way … 80 percent 
	of the Americans support us. It’s absurd.”
  He then recounts 
	how he dealt with Clinton, whom he refers to as "extremely pro-Palestinian." 
	“I wasn’t afraid to manoeuvre there. I was not afraid 
	to clash with Clinton.”
  His approach to White House demands to 
	withdraw from Palestinian territory under the Oslo accords, he says, drew on 
	his grandfather’s philosophy: “It would be better to give two percent than 
	to give 100 percent.”
  He therefore signed the 1997 agreement to pull 
	the Israeli army back from much of Hebron, the last Palestinian city under 
	direct occupation, as a way to avoid conceding more territory.
  “The 
	trick,” he says, “is not to be there [in the occupied Palestinian 
	territories] and be broken; the trick is to be there and pay a minimal 
	price.”
  The “trick” that stopped further withdrawals, Netanyahu adds, 
	was to redefine what parts of the occupied territories counted as a 
	“specified military site” under the Oslo accords. He wanted the White House 
	to approve in writing the classification of the Jordan Valley, a large area 
	of the West Bank, as such a military site.
  “Now, they did not want to 
	give me that letter, so I did not give [them] the Hebron Agreement. I 
	stopped the government meeting, I said: ‘I’m not signing.’ Only when the 
	letter came … did I sign the Hebron Agreement. Why does this matter? Because 
	at that moment I actually stopped the Oslo accords.”
  Last week, after 
	meeting Obama in Washington, the Israeli prime minister gave an interview to 
	Fox News in which he appeared to be in no hurry to make concessions: “Can we 
	have a negotiated peace? Yes. Can it be implemented by 2012? I think it’s 
	going to take longer than that,” he said.
  There must be at least a 
	very strong suspicion that Netanyahu is as firmly committed today as he was 
	then to destroying any chance of peace with the Palestinians.
 
  
	Jonathan Cook is a writer and journalist 
	based in Nazareth, Israel. A version of this
	
	article originally appeared in The 
	National, published in Abu Dhabi. It is reprinted by Ma'an with the 
	author's permission.  
	The video can be watched at: 
	
	http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=300732  
       
       | 
     | 
     
      
      
      
      
     |