Al-Jazeerah History  
	 
	
	
	Archives  
	 
	
	
	Mission & Name   
	 
	
	
	
	Conflict Terminology   
	 
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	
	Gaza Holocaust   
	 
	
	Gulf War   
	 
	
	Isdood  
	 
	
	Islam   
	 
	
	News   
	 
	
	
	News Photos 
	  
	 
	
	
	Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)   
	 
	
	www.aljazeerah.info
	  
      
       
      
        
        
     | 
     | 
    
    
  AIG Gate: 
  The World's Greatest 
	Insurance Heist 
  By 
	Ellen Brown 
       
      ccun.org, February 8, 2010
  
	                          
	 
	
	Rumor has it that Timothy Geithner is on his way out as Treasury 
	Secretary, due to his involvement in the AIG scandal that is now unraveling 
	in hearings before the House Oversight and Reform Committee. 
	
	Bob Chapman writes in The International Forecaster:   Each day 
	brings more revelations of efforts of the NY Fed and Goldman Sachs to hide 
	the details of the criminal conspiracy of the AIG bailout. . . . This is a 
	real crisis on the scale of Watergate. Corruption at its finest.   But 
	unlike the perpetrators of the Watergate scandal, who wound up looking at 
	jail time, Geithner evidently has a golden parachute waiting at Goldman 
	Sachs, not coincidentally the largest recipient of the AIG bailout.  At 
	least that is the rumor sparked by an article by
	
	Caroline Baum on Bloomberg News, titled “Goldman Parachute Awaits 
	Geithner to Ease Fall.”  Hank Paulson, Geithner’s predecessor, was CEO 
	of Goldman Sachs before coming to the Treasury.  Geithner, who has come 
	up through the ranks of government, could be walking through the revolving 
	door in the other direction.      Geithner has been under 
	the House microscope for the decision of the New York Fed, made while he 
	headed it, to buy out about $30 billion in credit default swaps 
	(over-the-counter derivative insurance contracts) that AIG sold on toxic 
	debt securities. The chief recipients of this payout were Goldman Sachs, 
	Merrill Lynch, Societe Generale and Deutsche Bank. Goldman got
	
	$13 billion, roughly equivalent to its bonus pool for the first 9 months 
	of 2009.  Critics are calling the New York Fed’s decision a back-door 
	bailout for the banks, which received 100 cents on the dollar for contracts 
	that would have been worth far less had AIG been put through bankruptcy 
	proceedings in the ordinary way. In a Bloomberg article provocatively titled 
	“Secret Banking Cabal Emerges from AIG Shadows,”
	
	David Reilly writes:    [T]he New York Fed is a quasi-governmental 
	institution that isn’t subject to citizen intrusions such as freedom of 
	information requests, unlike the Federal Reserve. This impenetrability comes 
	in handy since the bank is the preferred vehicle for many of the Fed’s 
	bailout programs. It’s as though the New York Fed was a black-ops outfit for 
	the nation’s central bank.    The beneficiaries of the New York Fed’s 
	largesse got paid in full although they had agreed to take much less. In a 
	November 2009 article titled “It’s Time to Fire Tim Geithner,”
	Dylan 
	Ratigan wrote:   [L]ast November . . . New York Federal Reserve 
	Governor Tim Geithner decided to deliver 100 cents on the dollar, in secret 
	no less, to pay off the counter parties to the world's largest (and still 
	un-investigated) insurance fraud -- AIG. This full payoff with taxpayer 
	dollars was carried out by Geithner after AIG's bank customers, such as 
	Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank and Societe Generale, had already previously 
	agreed to taking as little as 40 cents on the dollar. Even after the GM 
	autoworkers, bondholders and vendors all received a government-enforced 
	haircut on their contracts,
	
	he still had the audacity
	
	to claim the “sanctity of contracts” in the dealings with these 
	companies like AIG.   Geithner
	
	testified that the Fed’s hands were tied and that the bank could not 
	“selectively default on contractual obligations without courting collapse.” 
	But if it was all on the up and up, why all the secrecy? The contention that 
	the Fed had no choice is also belied by a recent holding in the Lehman 
	Brothers bankruptcy, in which New York Bankruptcy Judge James Peck set aside 
	the same type of investment contracts that Secretaries Paulson and Geithner 
	repeatedly swore under oath had to be paid in full in the case of AIG. The 
	judge declared that clauses in those contracts subordinating other claims to 
	the holders’ claims were null and void in bankruptcy.  “And notice,” 
	comments bank analyst
	Chris 
	Whalen, “that the world has not ended when the holders of [derivative] 
	contracts are treated like everyone else.” He calls the AIG bailout “a 
	hideous political contrivance that ranks with the great acts of political 
	corruption and thievery in the history of the United States.”    If 
	you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, said Joseph Goebbels, 
	people will eventually come to believe it. The bailout of Wall Street 
	initiated in September 2008 was premised on the dire prediction that if 
	major counterparties in the massive edifice of derivative contracts were 
	allowed to fall, the whole interlocking house of cards would collapse and 
	take the economy with it. A hijacked Congress dutifully protected the 
	derivatives game with taxpayer money while the real economy proceeded to 
	collapse, the financial sector choosing to put their money into this 
	protected form of speculative betting rather than into the more mundane and 
	risky business of making loans to struggling businesses and homeowners. In 
	the end, 
	$170 billion of federal funds went to AIG and the banks feeding at its 
	trough. Meanwhile, a survey of state finances by the Center on Budget and 
	Policy Priorities think tank found that state governments face a collective
	
	$168 billion budget shortfall for fiscal 2010. If the money used to bail 
	out AIG and the banks had been used to bail out the states instead, the 
	states would not be facing insolvency today.     There is no law 
	against gambling, but there is a law against fraud.  In Watergate, a 
	special prosecutor was appointed to bring criminal charges; but times seem 
	to have changed.      Ellen Brown developed her 
	research skills as an attorney practicing civil litigation in Los Angeles. 
	In Web of Debt, her latest book, she turns those skills to an analysis of 
	the Federal Reserve and “the money trust.” She shows how this private cartel 
	has usurped the power to create money from the people themselves, and how we 
	the people can get it back. Her eleven books include Forbidden Medicine, 
	Nature’s Pharmacy (co-authored with Dr. Lynne Walker), and The Key to 
	Ultimate Health (co-authored with Dr. Richard Hansen). Her websites are
	www.webofdebt.com,
	www.ellenbrown.com, and
	www.public-banking.com. 
	www.webofdebt.com/articles
	 
	   
       | 
     | 
     
      
      
      
      
     |