Dutch Government Falls over Afghanistan, 
		No Comment from NATO Chief
        
		
        By Christopher King
		Redress, February 22, 2010
		
Christopher King expresses the hope that the fall of the 
		Dutch government over participation in the US-led aggression in 
		Afghanistan could be the start of a trend that will see Europe regain 
		its independence from the USA. 
Hopefully the split in the Dutch 
		parliament on withdrawal from Afghanistan is a sign that Europe is 
		beginning to recognize who the real terrorists are. The true situation 
		is so different from the media’s portrayal that the general public finds 
		it difficult, perhaps impossible, to contemplate. I wonder how much 
		Europe’s politicians understand. The situation is truly desperate – not 
		for Afghanistan but for Europe.
The Israeli-American axis’s 
		policy is 100 per cent lies and deception. Since the purpose of NATO is 
		supposed to be the protection of Europe, it is remarkable that we never 
		hear from its chief. I don’t mean Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the 
		secretary-general who our media always calls the “NATO head”. He is 
		nothing of the sort. Rasmussen is the ex-prime minister of Denmark who 
		has no power whatsoever. He is the mouthpiece for the real head of NATO.
		"The head of NATO is always an American. This is where the power in 
		Europe lies – with an American admiral, not a Danish political hack."
		The title of NATO’s real head is Supreme Allied Commander, Europe, 
		currently Admiral James G. Stavridis, US Navy, of whom very few people 
		have ever heard. The head of NATO is always an American. This is where 
		the power in Europe lies – with an American admiral, not a Danish 
		political hack.
This is the great European deception. I have
		written 
		previously that the reason for America’s involvement of Europe in its 
		aggressive wars is the consolidation of its military grip on Europe 
		through NATO. The proof is the United States’
		NATO First Act 
		now presented to Congress and going through committees. This 
		legislation, completely unreported by the European media, is intended to 
		make American bases in Europe permanent. 
This is Europe’s 
		unrecognized crisis – permanent military takeover by the United States 
		with the objectives of parasitizing Europe’s economy, preventing closer 
		economic integration with Russia and as a source of cannon fodder for 
		its wars.
We have seen an example of economic parasitization in 
		recent days with the American firm Kraft’s takeover of the British 
		international Cadbury to sustain its failing profits, that I discuss
		here. Kraft has 
		almost no capital of its own – it operates on borrowed money. It bought 
		Cadbury on 100 per cent additional borrowing, evidently using taxpayer 
		funds from American, British and German banks. This is the ugly face of 
		US capitalism that brought about the current world financial crisis 
		through the export of fraudulent American debt and derivatives. 
		America’s virulent fight against communism was not against its 
		pronounced despotic tendencies or its economic inefficiencies. The US’s 
		collusion with Saddam Hussein and promotion of Iran’s Shah in place of 
		the CIA subverted Mossadeq democracy, among other tyrants, demonstrate 
		its tolerance of despotism provided there is financial payoff. Its own 
		current war crimes in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, not to mention 
		practices such as torture, kidnapping and assassination, demonstrate its 
		attitude to law and justice. No, its hatred of communism and socialism 
		was because wholly state-owned enterprises offer no opportunities for 
		American economic exploitation.
		"With a vanishing industrial base and shrinking economy sustained by 
		borrowing, the US in now committed to parasitizing Europe and the Middle 
		Eastern oil fields."
		The United States is now in desperate difficulties. It has squandered 
		its own resources and is accustomed to parasitizing other countries’ 
		resources to sustain its extravagant lifestyle, enormous military empire 
		and wars. These policies have been at the expense of investment in 
		research and genuine industrial and economic development. With a 
		vanishing industrial base and shrinking economy sustained by borrowing, 
		the US in now committed to parasitizing Europe and the Middle Eastern 
		oil fields. The United Kingdom, with the same economic policies, is 
		unsurprisingly in the same position. This is the reason for the UK’s 
		slavish support for US policies and its atrocities in Iraq, Afghanistan 
		and Pakistan. 
The UK and US are on permanent downward economic 
		trends for the first time in 200 years. The traitors Anthony Blair and 
		Gordon Brown have been foremost in selling Israeli-American policy to 
		Europe. They are guilty not only of personal involvement in war crimes 
		but have permitted the military occupation of their country. Moreover, 
		following US economic policies, they have destroyed the UK economy. For 
		example, in the last few days it has become clear that 2,800 jobs will 
		be lost in Welsh and northern English steel plants. The UK steel 
		industry and UK manufacturing now hardly exist.
Revelations about 
		British government collusion with atrocities continue to trickle out: 
		government collusion in the torture of Binyam Mohammed, the post mortem 
		coverup in the weapons inspector David Kelly’s alleged suicide and 
		Anthony Blair’s willingness to create any story in order to invade Iraq. 
		Most recently, we have British 
		collusion in the Israeli assassination of the Hamas official Mahmoud 
		al-Mabhouh.
		Hamas, whether the US and UK like it or not, is the legitimate, 
		democratically-elected government of Palestine, which the 
		Israeli-American axis hates because it opposes Israel’s theft of 
		Palestinian land and ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people. The 
		axis’s British running dogs (with acknowledgement to the Chinese for 
		this appellation) hope for crumbs from America’s table but have betrayed 
		not only all principles of legality and humanitarianism but also their 
		country’s military and economic security. The enrichment of Anthony 
		Blair, a mere GBP 10 million or so to date, are cheap crumbs to the US 
		for gaining control of the British army, not to mention any other 
		aspects of government that it finds convenient. 
It is bad enough 
		that the British, Dutch and other Europeans are suffering heavy 
		casualties in following the aggressive adventures of the failed state 
		that is the United States. The matter is much more serious and closer to 
		home. I have said it before and will say it again: Europe and the UK 
		must rid itself of American bases and those who support them, and form 
		its own defence force independent of the United States. That is where 
		economic and defence security lie.  
Christopher King is a retired 
		consultant and lecturer in management and marketing. He lives in London, 
		UK.