Al-Jazeerah History  
	 
	
	
	Archives  
	 
	
	
	Mission & Name   
	 
	
	
	
	Conflict Terminology   
	 
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	
	Gaza Holocaust   
	 
	
	Gulf War   
	 
	
	Isdood  
	 
	
	Islam   
	 
	
	News   
	 
	
	
	News Photos 
	  
	 
	
	
	Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)   
	 
	
	www.aljazeerah.info
	  
      
       
      
        
        
     | 
     | 
    
     
	  The Useless Logic of Round Numbers: 
	 
	War is Criminal Any Day  
	By Ramzy Baroud 
	Al-Jazeerah & ccun.org, February 14, 2010 
	   The media’s habit of revisiting certain issues at set intervals 
	can be strange and even illogical at times. For example, many news outlets 
	commented on President Barack Obama’s first 100 days in office, as well as 
	on the anniversary of his election win, and then again one year after his 
	inauguration day. With every new round number, more commentators joined in 
	and discussions heated up between proponents and detractors of his 
	government’s performance.    I am not exactly sure why we like round 
	numbers. Is it because they make valuations easy, even when the particular 
	number is irrelevant? Some philosophers, Plato included, believed that order 
	and symmetry are innate values in the human psyche. Perhaps. Or, perhaps, in 
	the case of the media, numbers give us the sense, deceptively, that we have 
	a grasp over certain truths.  We determine the order in which legacies 
	such as Obama’s should be dissected. After a decided date, the subject can 
	be ignored until the next round number arrives, bringing with it more 
	useless chatter.    Of course, this is a delusion. Like much of the 
	media’s behaviour, it has no connection to reality. It’s all a mind game. A 
	lie, even. For victims of US policies in Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine, and 
	elsewhere, the attention given to round numbers is wholly illogical. The 
	drones flying over Afghanistan and Pakistan, loaded with killing technology, 
	care little for numbers, including the number of lives they destroy daily. 
	  Did Gazans starve less when we ‘examined’ Obama’s (pro-Israel) legacy 
	after 100 days of his presidency? Where they better off one year from his 
	election victory or one year from his inauguration?    How about 273 
	days from his ascendancy to the White House? Was that a particularly chaotic 
	day in Baghdad’s streets? Do soldiers take a break from killing on even 
	days, and resume the slaughter on odd ones?    But why should this 
	discussion matter at all? It matters because we often buy into this folly, 
	allowing the media to determine what is important and when a discussion is 
	pertinent. Those involved in this charade express their views, agreeing 
	politely and disagreeing loudly.  The next day, the media returns to a 
	state of complacency, as if the detrimental policies of Obama’s government 
	ceased to exist; as if war was eradicated, and there was nothing left to 
	talk about.    But truly, do Palestinians in Gaza care much for round 
	numbers? I doubt it. Nor do Iraqis, Afghanis, and, now, Yemenis. Misery is 
	misery, any day, every day; war is an inferno. The smell of death, the 
	scenes of blood in Kabul and Baghdad and Gaza, will remain the same on a 
	Friday, or a Tuesday, 100 day into Obama’s presidency or 514 days later. 
	  Every minute in a victim’s or potential victim’s life counts. Those who 
	have lived in war zones can comprehend this truth. That’s why Gaza wants to 
	see the end of its misery now, instead of waiting for CNN’s next roundtable 
	discussion assessing the next round number in Obama’s presidency. Iraqis and 
	Afghanis similarly listen to words and judge deeds, caring little for 
	numbers.    Remember when Obama spoke to the “Muslim world” from Cairo 
	on June 4th? That’s the date that Muslims - many still victimized, directly 
	or otherwise, by the Obama administration’s policies – remember and recount. 
	On that day, Obama made promises, speaking with ‘audacity’, and much hubris. 
	Muslims listened.  Some clapped and even cheered; others hesitated or 
	expressed cynicism, but still hoped for change. Alas, none of those hopes 
	have been fulfilled, as instead of change, there is only a continuation of 
	the policies of his predecessor.   “I have come here to seek a new 
	beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world; one based 
	upon mutual interest and mutual respect,” said Obama in Cairo. His deeds 
	since then have reaped the opposite results: mistrust and disrespect.    
	“Make no mistake: we do not want to keep our troops in Afghanistan,” he 
	said. Since then, he has ordered the surge of 30,000 additional soldiers to 
	that already distraught country. The US, its allies and their drones have 
	killed and maimed hundreds of innocent civilians since that statement was 
	made.   “Today, America has a dual responsibility: to help Iraq forge 
	a better future – and to leave Iraq to Iraqis,” he said. One fails to see 
	evidence of a better future based on his administration’s conduct in Iraq in 
	the last year or so. Little progress has been made in leaving Iraq to the 
	Iraqis.   Even in Cairo, he had the audacity to lecture Palestinians, 
	the very victims of Israel’s brutal occupation, which is armed and funded by 
	US money. “Palestinians must abandon violence. Resistance through violence 
	and killing is wrong and does not succeed. Now is the time for Palestinians 
	to focus on what they can build.” We must note that the US government 
	continues to make these demands of Palestinians, ignoring the fact that 
	Israel’s reign of terror has never ceased, including Israeli violence 
	against Palestinian non-violent resistance in the West Bank.   Still, 
	Obama did state that “The United States does not accept the legitimacy of 
	continued Israeli settlements.  Israel must also live up to its 
	obligations to ensure that Palestinians can live, and work, and develop 
	their society.”    Alas, the Obama administration faltered on its 
	demand of a complete Israeli freeze, and is now harassing the ineffective 
	leadership of Mahmoud Abbas in the West Bank to return to the negotiation 
	table without conditions.    In addition, the hope of ensuring that 
	“Palestinians can live, and work and develop their society,” is nothing but 
	a pipedream, considering that Palestinians in Gaza teeter between chronic 
	malnutrition and starvation. We cannot forget the fact that the siege on 
	Gaza would not have been possible without US support.   So before we 
	giddily gather to discuss Obama’s legacy the next time another round number 
	is celebrated on our television screens, let’s remember that for an Iraqi 
	father, frantically searching for his son’s remains in a Baghdad street, 
	numbers matter little, whether even, odd, round or in any combination.  
	A massacre is a massacre, and a war of choice is a 
	crime, any day, any time.   - Ramzy Baroud (www.ramzybaroud.net) 
	is an internationally-syndicated columnist and the editor of 
	PalestineChronicle.com. His latest book is "My Father Was a Freedom Fighter: 
	Gaza's Untold Story" (Pluto Press, London), now available on Amazon.com. 
       
       
       | 
     | 
     
      
      
      
      
     |