Mission & Name
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
Zionism Carries Within it the Seeds of its
Nayef Al-Rajoub Interviewed By Khalid Amayreh
ME Monitor, August 2, 2010
Nayef Al-Rajoub, 52, is one of the most
popular Islamic leaders in Occupied Palestine. His courageous promotion of
Palestinian rights, including the right of return for Palestinian refugees,
has attracted the unwanted attention of the Israeli security services. He
has served a total of eight years in Israeli jails, mostly on trumped-up
charges such as "incitement against the Israeli state". Indeed, Mr. Rajoub
was released from an Israeli jail only a few weeks ago, having served nearly
50 months for the "crime" of taking part in the 2006 Palestinian elections.
In Al-Khalil (Hebron), Rajoub won more votes than any other candidate. The
elections were given the go-ahead by both Israel and the US in the hope that
Fatah would win. However, when Hamas won a landslide victory, the US and
most other western countries, as well as America's puppet regimes in the
Middle East, were hostile towards the new Palestinian government, resulting
in the imposition of a financial siege (followed by a total siege on Gaza)
intended to make the occupied territories ungovernable by the new Islamist
Khalid Amayreh spoke with Nayef Rajoub in his office in the town of
Dura in the southern West Bank.
Khalid Amayreh: How do you see the Palestinian cause 20 years
Nayef Rajoub: I believe the Palestinian Authority of
Ramallah will keep on walking along the fruitless path of concessions and
surrender until there is nothing or very little left in terms of Palestinian
rights. Israel might agree to give the PA a Kafkaesque state that is bereft
of dignity, viability and sovereignty.
As to when the conflict will
be over, nobody can say for sure, but I am certain that the conflict won't
be over until the disappearance of the ideology of Zionism that makes Israel
a colonialist state. This is not wishful thinking; Zionism carries within it
the seeds of its own demise and Israel is a state based on the dispossession
of another people. It is, therefore, based on oppression and injustice. As
such, its lifespan will not be very long.
KA: Do you see any
possibility of coexistence between Jews and Arabs in Palestine?
As long as Zionism is the ideology underpinning Israel, coexistence is
impossible. How can we coexist with a community which insists on enslaving
and tormenting us? Besides, Zionists - Jews and non-Jews alike – do not want
coexistence; they want Jewish supremacy in Palestine and ethnic cleansing of
the indigenous population, the Palestinians.
KA: But hasn’t the South
African scenario proved that coexistence is possible between previously
NR: The South African comparison is
inherently wrong. Israel is an entity that is based on ethnic cleansing and
land theft and it won't accept majority rule under any circumstances, unlike
the South Africans.
KA: Given the weakness of the overall Arab
position, do you think that Israel might resort to committing a major
provocation, such as demolishing Al-Aqsa Mosque?
NR: Yes; if the
Palestinian Authority and Arab states continue with this policy of
capitulation, including conspiring with Israel and the US against the
Palestinians’ legitimate rights, this will embolden the Zionist
establishment and make Israel embark on more daring crimes, of which the
destruction of Al-Aqsa Mosque could be one.
KA: Do you think the time
for the peace process has passed by in light of the chronic failure of that
NR: What is erroneously called "the peace process"
is actually a series of Israeli diktats imposed on the Palestinians, who
have been reduced to the status of a vanquished supplicant begging for
whatever Israel condescends to give. Unfortunately, this situation is likely
to continue for the foreseeable future, at least until the Muslim Ummah can
generate enough will in the international community to do something more
KA: What do you mean by "something more positive"?
NR: To get into a position whereby we are negotiating from a position of
strength; doing so from a position of weakness ends up as begging.
KA: Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas has warned that he will
switch to a one-state solution strategy if Israel keeps building Jewish
colonies in the West Bank, especially in East Jerusalem. What do you think
NR: This is a clear acknowledgement that the folly known as
"the peace process" has failed. The PA has been indulging in futile gestures
and failure for the past 20 years. This also shows that the US is not really
serious about finding an agreement that will put an end to the Arab-Israel
I don't think a unitary state, or threats to establish such
an entity, have a real chance of success under the present circumstances.
Israel will not allow an Arab majority to determine the direction of such a
state, besides which the Palestinian-Arab side is not strong enough to force
Israel to accept a democratic solution.
KA: Does the Islamic movement
in Palestine believe in the possibility of creating a viable state in the
West Bank within the 1967 borders?
NR: No, not under the current
circumstances, given the weakness of the overall Arab position and because
of America’s collusion and alliance with Israel.
KA: If you were in
the PA President’s shoes, what would you do?
NR: I think that anyone
in that position has to agree to abandon principles; I wouldn’t be prepared
to do that, so I would never be PA president.
KA: If you had known in
2006 what you know now, would the Islamic movement still have participated
in the legislative elections?
NR: Yes, we would. We knew from the
very beginning that our path wouldn't be lined with roses. We had to take
part in the elections in order to stop the avalanche of corruption and
concessions to the Zionists. To put it simply, someone had to stop the rot.
KA: Who is responsible for the national rift between Fatah and Hamas?
NR: The people responsible for the rift are those who didn't respect the
outcome of the elections. They are Fatah, the US, the EU and Israel, in
addition to the Arab regimes at America's beck and call.
KA: The US
and its allies insist that Hamas must recognise Israel before the Islamic
movement can be accepted as a legitimate political player. Would Hamas
recognize Israel under any conceivable circumstances?
NR: It is both
unreasonable and illogical to ask the victims to recognise the legitimacy of
their tormentors. It is Israel that must first recognise Palestinians’
legitimate rights, including the right to self-determination and the right
KA: How do you view the so-called Egyptian document which
is aimed at achieving reconciliation between Fatah and Hamas?
document is a recipe cooked up by Fatah and Egypt intended to serve Fatah’s
interests. What Palestine needs is unconditional reconciliation.
addition, I would like to say that what the PA is doing in the West Bank,
namely the unrelenting persecution of Hamas, underscores Fatah’s lack of
seriousness about achieving national reconciliation.
accuses Hamas of subservience to Iran. Is that true?
NR: Hamas is not
subservient to any earthly power except the Palestinian people. Any other
suggestion or insinuation should be understood in the context of propaganda
against the Islamic movement.
Besides, the Palestinian cause is the
cause of all Arab and Islamic peoples. Hence, it is the religious duty of
all Muslims and Muslim states to support the Palestinian cause. It is far
from dishonourable for Arab and Muslim states to support our steadfastness,
whereas it is truly dishonourable to throw oneself into the lap of our