Al-Jazeerah History  
	 
	
	
	Archives  
	 
	
	
	Mission & Name   
	 
	
	
	
	Conflict Terminology   
	 
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	
	Gaza Holocaust   
	 
	
	Gulf War   
	 
	
	Isdood  
	 
	
	Islam   
	 
	
	News   
	 
	
	
	News Photos 
	  
	 
	
	
	Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials  
	 
	
	
	
	US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)   
	 
	
	www.aljazeerah.info
	  
      
       
      
        
        
     | 
     | 
    
       US Republicans Drifting to Extreme Islamophobia
	  
  By James Zogby 
      Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, August 19, 2010 
	    
	  GOP Drift 
	  Republicans have dug a deep hole for themselves on matters related to 
	  the Middle East and Islam reflecting the extent to which the Party has 
	  become captive of the neo-conservative "clash of civilization" crowd and 
	  their partners on the evangelical Christian right. This drift becomes 
	  clear listening to statements by Republican leaders and surveying the 
	  attitudes of the party's base. 
  Comments, a few weeks back, by 2012 
	  presidential aspirants Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich, in opposition to the 
	  building of a mosque in New York City,  are a case in point (Palin 
	  called the mosque a "stab to the heart" while Gingrich claimed that 
	  "America is experiencing an Islamist cultural-political offensive designed 
	  to undermine and destroy our civilization"). Other top Republican 
	  contenders are no better. Mike Huckabee, a leader of the religious right, 
	  has made disparaging comments about Muslims and is so bizarrely pro-Israel 
	  that he has stated "there’s really no such thing as a Palestinian"; while 
	  Mitt Romney, once moderate Governor of Massachusetts, now darling of 
	  conservatives, has, on more than one occasion, suggested that the 
	  government wiretap mosques.
  The GOP has virulently opposed 
	  President Obama's Middle East peace initiative and outreach efforts to the 
	  Muslim World. Following his June 2009 Cairo University speech, I debated 
	  Liz Cheney and former Senator George Allen, both of whom working from 
	  Republican Party talking points, took the President to task accusing him 
	  of selling America short in order to curry favor with Muslims. They 
	  charged Obama with “moral equivalence” (meaning that he equated his 
	  concern with the Palestinians with the traditional American concern for 
	  Israelis) and “apologizing” for our use of torture and the Iraq War. 
	   The effort to score partisan political points by exploiting fears of 
	  Muslims and exacerbating tensions emanating from the Arab-Israeli conflict 
	  led two Republican stalwarts, Bill Kristol (neo-conservative editor of the 
	  Weekly Standard) and Gary Bauer (one time Presidential candidate and 
	  leader of the Christian right), to form the "Emergency Committee for 
	  Israel". The group has sponsored TV ads attacking a Democratic senate 
	  candidate accusing him of befriending radical Muslims and being an enemy 
	  of Israel.     
  The same aggressive hard-line 
	  behavior is on display in Congress. Just last week, Texas Republican Louie 
	  Gohmert introduced a resolution explicitly authorizing an Israeli attack 
	  on Iran. While Gohmert can be dismissed as a loose cannon—given his 
	  penchant for long winded fundamentalist rants about Israel’s claims to the 
	  Holy Land—it is disturbing that his “Israeli attack on Iran” resolution 
	  was endorsed by 1/3 of the Republican Caucus. 
  Also last week, 
	  Florida Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, who would become chair of the 
	  House Foreign Relations Committee if Republicans take control of Congress, 
	  countered the Obama Administration’s effort to elevate the status of 
	  Washington’s PLO office by circulating a letter calling on Secretary of 
	  State Hillary Clinton to expel Palestinian diplomats from the U.S. and 
	  move the U.S. Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. 
  This ideological 
	  drift has filtered downward and is now playing out in elections around the 
	  U.S. In Colorado, for example, Republican senate candidate Jane Norton 
	  criticized the Obama Administration’s efforts to include Muslims in NASA’s 
	  science and technology programs, calling it a “feel good" effort that 
	  Americans could not afford. In Tennessee, the sitting Lt. Governor, Ron 
	  Ramsey,  who is running for the Republican nomination for governor, 
	  was quoted saying "you could even argue whether being a Muslim is actually 
	  a religion, or is it a nationality, a way of life or cult". And a 
	  candidate for Congress in Tennessee has made an issue of efforts by the 
	  local Muslim community to build a mosque, saying that "our nation was 
	  founded on the tenets of the Judeo-Christian tradition; we have a right to 
	  defend that tradition". 
  This marriage of neo-conservatives and the 
	  Christian right and its impact on the Republican Party’s approach to 
	  Middle East policy was on display last week at the annual gathering in 
	  Washington of the group, Christians United for Israel. While one lone 
	  Democrat was on the program (stridently hawkish Congresswoman Shelley 
	  Berkeley), other headliners included the GOP's Minority Whip, other 
	  Republican elected and former elected officials and representatives of 
	  hard-line, right-wing, pro-Israel groups and conservative think tanks.  
	   All of this has had a profound impact on deepening the partisan divide 
	  on a range of issues, including how Democrats and Republicans approach 
	  critical Middle East policy issues. In recent polls we have noted a 
	  disturbing gap between the two parties. For example, in an answer to the 
	  question "How should the Obama Administration pursue peace in the Middle 
	  East”, 14% of Democrats said “Support Israel” and 5% said “Support the 
	  Palestinians”, but 74% responded that the U.S. “Should steer a middle 
	  course”. 71% of Republicans, on the other hand, said “Support Israel” and 
	  3% said “Support the Palestinians”, while only 20% said “steer a middle 
	  course”.
  This Republican drift and the harshness of their anti-Arab 
	  and anti-Muslim rhetoric is worrisome. America's engagement across the 
	  Middle East and South Asia is too important and the dangers we face are 
	  too great for such virulence and misunderstanding to have taken hold in 
	  one of our political parties—especially when that party's current leaders 
	  appear so willing to vent their venom and use it for political advantage. 
	  Even George W. Bush, for all his flaws, knew better, as did his two 
	  Secretaries of States, and his father and many other Republican leaders of 
	  the not too distant past. It's high time for these traditional 
	  conservatives to come forward and challenge the current GOP crop who are 
	  running their party, and I fear, our country into a deep hole.  
  
	   
       
       | 
     | 
     
      
      
      
      
     |