Al-Jazeerah: Cross-Cultural Understanding

News, October 2017


Al-Jazeerah History


Mission & Name  

Conflict Terminology  


Gaza Holocaust  

Gulf War  




News Photos  

Opinion Editorials

US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)




Editorial Note: The following news reports are summaries from original sources. They may also include corrections of Arabic names and political terminology. Comments are in parentheses.

Share the link of this article with your facebook friends


Taliban Claim the Deadly Assault on Afghani Government and Police Headquarters in Maroof District

October 1, 2017


NATO soldiers keep watch near the wreckage of their vehicle at the site of a
Taliban suicide attack in Kandahar on September 15, 2017


At least 12 Afghan security forces killed in suicide attack

Taliban claim the deadly assault on the government and police headquarters in Maroof district

Gulf News, September 28, 2017 AFP  

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan:

At least a dozen Afghan security forces were killed when a suicide attacker driving an explosives-packed Humvee blew himself up in the southern province of Kandahar, police said on Thursday.

The Taliban claimed the deadly assault on the government and police headquarters in Maroof district that also wounded several others.

“Twelve security forces were killed and four others were wounded,” Kandahar police spokesman Zia Durrani told AFP.

Durrani said the Taliban attackers had been “defeated”.

A border police commander in Maroof, which borders Pakistan, gave a slightly higher toll, telling AFP that 14 security personnel had been killed and eight wounded in the attack that happened late Wednesday.

“The intensity of the blast caused damage to the building and led to casualties,” he said.

“The clean-up operation is under way in the area.”

The attack is the latest deadly assault by the Taliban, which has been on the offensive since US-led Nato combat troops withdrew in 2014 and now controls swathes of territory across the country.

During a high-profile visit by US Defence Secretary Jim Mattis and Nato chief Jens Stoltenberg to the Afghan capital Kabul on Wednesday, insurgents launched a volley of rockets near the city’s international airport.

A US air strike launched in support of Afghan security forces who had confronted the attackers caused “several casualties” when a missile malfunctioned.

One person was killed and 11 others wounded in the assault that lasted several hours, according to the interior ministry.


US airstrike in Afghanistan causes casualties

Malfunctioning missile overshadows high-profile visit of defence chief Mattis

Gulf News, September 28, 2017, Kabul:

An American airstrike on insurgents in Kabul Wednesday caused “several casualties” after a missile “malfunctioned”, Nato said, overshadowing a high-profile visit by US Defence Secretary Jim Mattis and Nato chief Jens Stoltenberg.

The US strike was launched in support of Afghan security forces who had confronted militants after they fired a volley of rockets near the capital’s international airport hours after Mattis arrived in the country for talks.

One person was killed and 11 others were wounded in the assault, according to the interior ministry. The Taliban and Daesh’s local Khorasan province affiliate claimed responsibility.

“Tragically, one of the missiles malfunctioned, causing several casualties,” Nato’s Resolute Support mission said in a statement.

Nato said it “deeply regrets the harm to non-combatants” and an investigation was under way into the attack and the defective ammunition.

The casualties caused by a US airstrike in the capital have cast a pall over Mattis’s trip to the country and could fuel anger towards American forces whose reputation is already tarnished.

Earlier this month US forces distributed leaflets in the northern province of Parwan that were deemed highly offensive to Muslims and sparked angry protests.

Mattis is the first member of US President Donald Trump’s cabinet to visit Afghanistan since Trump last month pledged to stay the course in America’s longest war.

His unannounced visit came as the country’s beleaguered security forces struggle to beat back the Taliban, which has been on the offensive since US-led Nato combat troops withdrew at the end of 2014.

Mattis, along with Stoltenberg, held talks with President Ashraf Ghani to discuss the US-led Nato “train and assist” mission — designed to strengthen Afghanistan’s military so it can defend the country on its own.

At a joint news conference with Ghani at the presidential palace, Mattis and Stoltenberg renewed their commitment to Afghanistan, and expressed determination to stop the country becoming a safe haven for terrorists.

“We will not abandon Afghanistan to a merciless enemy trying to kill its way to power,” Mattis told reporters in reference to the Taliban.

Stoltenberg said: “The more stable Afghanistan is the more safe we will be.”

So far, more than 15 Nato members have agreed to send additional troops.

Repeated shelling

US generals have for months been describing the situation in Afghanistan as a stalemate, despite years of support for Afghan partners, continued help from Nato and an overall cost in fighting and reconstruction to the United States of more than $1 trillion (Dh3.67 trillion).

Wednesday’s succession of rocket attacks in Kabul did not alter Mattis’s movements, and he later flew to Forward Operating Base Gamberi east of Kabul, where he spoke to US troops who are training Afghan security forces.

October marks the war’s 16th anniversary, and the resurgent Taliban have promised to turn Afghanistan into a “graveyard” for foreign forces. They have been mounting deadly attacks as they maintain their grip on large swathes of the country.

On allegations that Iran and Russia are actively propping up the Taliban, Mattis said it would be “extremely unwise if they think they can somehow support terrorism in another country and not have it come back to haunt them”.

Taliban ‘disarray’

Under Trump’s plan, the US is sending more than 3,000 additional troops to Afghanistan, on top of the 11,000 already on the ground, to train and advise the country’s security forces.

Nato allies have about 5,000 troops deployed around the country.

Critics have questioned what the extra US soldiers can accomplish that previous forces — who numbered some 100,000 at the height of the fighting — were unable to do.

But Afghanistan expert John Hannah of the Washington-based Foundation for Defence of Democracies said the Afghan forces are now at adequate troop levels and have plenty of combat experience, boosting their chances of success.

We “may be getting to a point where after many more years of investment we’ve got an institutional (security force) capable of holding its own in most of the country against the Taliban and Al Qaida, and eventually grinding down the enemy and winding down the war,” Hannah told AFP.

“That, to my mind, is our main ticket out.”

General John Nicholson, head of US forces in Afghanistan, said the new US policy had lifted the spirits of Afghan troops while putting the Taliban leadership in “disarray” as they digest news of an indefinite US commitment.

“On the battlefield... Taliban morale has dipped, their casualties have remained very high,” Nicholson told reporters. “So this certainly has had an effect.”


Share the link of this article with your facebook friends

Fair Use Notice

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.




Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent Al-Jazeerah & &