|
ÇáÌÒíÑÉ
Al-Jazeerah.Home
News
Cartoons
News
Photo
Documents
Editorials
Opinion
Editorial
letters
to the editor
Human
Price of the Israeli Occupation of Palestine
Islam
Israeli
daily aggression on the Palestinian people
Media
Watch
Mission
and meaning of Al-Jazeerah
News
Photo
Peace
Activists
Poetry
Book
reviews
Public
Announcements
Public
Activities
Women
in News
Cities,
localities, and tourist attractions
|
|
Senator Hillary Clinton's Remarks to the
American
Israel
Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)Al-Jazeerah, February
8, 2007
I am so honored to be here and once again
to speak on behalf of the causes and concerns that we share. And there is
no doubt that AIPAC is at the forefront of efforts to advocate on behalf
of
Israel.
And on behalf of the shared interests and security and democracy that form
the unbreakable bond between our two nations.
I thank you for supporting AIPAC. Because
as active citizens you are serving an essential function: when you
advocate, when you lobby, when you speak out on issues that matter to
the Jewish community and to Israel you are speaking also on behalf of
issues that are important to the larger community of Americans. That’s
because the bond shared between the
U.S.
and
Israel
is based on shared interests but is rooted in the strength we derive from
our shared values. As Americans we are humbled by
Israel’s
commitment to civic engagement and open debate, free expression and the
rule of law, even in the face of grave dangers. The balance between a
life lived in faith and the civic life of a democratic state producing
dynamism and vigor in Israeli politics and society.
And both Israelis and
Americans know so well, a democracy is far more than just holding
elections. Democracy has to spring from an active and open citizenry
dedicated to tolerance, to respect for differences, to the rule of law, to
policies that lift us up not tear us down as fellow human beings, and to
the value of human life. So I thank AIPAC. I thank your national
leadership, Bernice and Howard, I thank the Northeast leadership,
including Yossi Siegel and Mike Sachs and so many others, and I don’t have
to tell you that as we gather tonight, your voice and your activism is
needed desperately.
This is a moment of great difficulty for
Israel
and great peril for
Israel,
for the
U.S.
and for free and democratic nations. Israel is confronting many of the
toughest challenges in her history, in a neighborhood that is less secure
than ever. At this moment of peril, what is vital is that we stand by our
friend and our ally and we stand by our own values. Israel is a beacon
of what’s right in a neighborhood overshadowed by the wrongs of
radicalism, extremism, despotism and terrorism. We need only look to
one of
Israel’s
greatest threats: namely,
Iran.
Make no mistake,
Iran
poses a threat not only to
Israel,
but to the entire
Middle East
and beyond, including the
U.S.
I don’t need to remind this group that about a month ago the Iranian
government hosted a conference in
Tehran
whose sole purpose was to deny the Holocaust.
Now that conference was
beyond the pale of international discourse and acceptable behavior and we
must not treat this situation as business as usual. The gathering was
hosted by the leader of the member of a United Nations state and by a
leader that has raised serious international concerns over his country’s
nuclear ambitions and who has called for Israel to be wiped off the map.
To deny the Holocaust places
Iran’'s
leadership in company with the most despicable bigots and historical
revisionists. It is an insult, not only to a memory of the millions of
Jews who suffered and died in the Shoah but also to the troops of the U.S.
and its allies, who in the fight to liberate Europe from Nazism bore
witness to the reality of the Holocaust.
Such comments add greater urgency to the
necessity to doing everything we can to deny nuclear weapons to
Iran.
The regime’s pro-terrorist, anti-American, anti-Israeli rhetoric only
underscores the urgency of our response to the threat we face.
U.S.
policy must be clear and unequivocal. We cannot, we should not, we must
not, permit
Iran
to build or acquire nuclear weapons. And in dealing with this threat as I
have said for a very long time, no option can be taken off the table.
But Iran is a threat not only because of
the hateful rhetoric spewed by its president, not only because of its
nuclear ambitions, but because it uses its influence and its revenues
in the region to support terrorist elements that are attacking innocent
Israelis; and now we believe attacking American soldiers. Hezbollah’'s
attacks on
Israel
this summer using Iranian weapons clearly demonstrate
Iran’s
malevolent influence even beyond its borders.
It is essential to those of us who care
deeply about what is happening in and to,
Israel,
to recognize that
Israel’s
struggle is a struggle on behalf of a future where people will be able to
live with peace and security. The kidnapping of Israeli soldiers,
that precipitated the conflicts in
Gaza
and
Lebanon
last summer, have not yet been resolved. And it is essential that
Israel’s
abducted soldiers are returned unconditionally. I visited with Karnit
Goldwasser before coming on to the stage; I met with Karnit and other
family members last summer. Karnit came to my office in the Senate, and
what an extraordinary young woman she is, her resolve, her love for her
husband, her belief in her country is just profound. I’ve heard her pleas
and the pleas of others, whose loved ones have been so cruelly taken. And
I know how important it is to ensure the safe return of the captured
soldiers. I’'ve also sent a letter to Jacob Kellenberger the President
of the International Committee of the Red Cross, to do whatever he can to
verify the health and well being of the three soldiers and ensure that
they have their full rights under the Geneva Convention and to do what he
can to secure their release.
We also know that the dangers posed to
Israel
have been compounded by the rise to power of Hamas, an avowed terrorist
group that has assumed the reigns of the government in the Palestinian
Authority and Hezbollah, the terrorist group that is represented in
the Lebanese government. I have long said that Hamas must not be
recognized until it renounces violence and terror and recognizes
Israel’s
right to exist. And now Hamas and Hezbollah must return
Israel’s
abducted soldiers and to stop their terror campaign against Israelis.
Hezbollah is second only to Al Qaeda to
the number of American lives it has claimed. We know too of the deep and
dangerous connections these terrorists share with the governments of
Syria
and
Iran;
and we are seeing the reprehensible consequences of having these terrorist
beachheads along
Israel’s
borders.
Hamas terror campaigns have
claimed the lives of hundreds of innocent civilians and its leaders have
refused to disarm, to reject violence, or even to recognize the right of
Israel to exist. We must insist that Hamas and indeed all Palestinian
parties renounce terror and recognize
Israel.
In 1999 I raised the problem of anti-Semitism in Palestinian textbooks,
now eight years later we continue to hear disturbing reports that these
textbooks have not been changed and I will be doing an event in Washington
in the Senate, next week, to highlight the anti-Semitic/ anti-Israeli
rhetoric that is still part of the Palestinian curriculum.
I was deeply saddened and outraged by the
suicide bombing in Eilat this week. Some are saying that Eilat was bombed
because Israeli’s efforts at self-defense through its security fence have
been so successful. But Eilat is a tragic reminder of the threats that
Israel
faces everyday and underscores the importance of our continued support for
Israel’s
right to protect and defend her people. The highest priority of any
government is to ensure the safety and security of its citizens and that
is why, as I have said, I’'ve been a strong supporter of Israel’s right
to build a security barrier to keep terrorists out. I have spoken out
against the International Court of Justice for questioning
Israel’'s
right to build that fence of security. On my trip to
Israel
a little over a year ago, I went to see the fence with my own eyes.
During a trip to Gilo, a
Jerusalem
neighborhood, I was greeted by Col. Danny Tirza, who was overseeing the
construction of the security fence.
He explained how just in this one
neighborhood, before the fence was constructed, residents of in Gilo would
come under fire, he pointed to some homes and he said “you know, in the
homes that were built here, the kitchen is in the back, facing the
Palestinian territories.” People would be watching television in their
living room, they would come in to get a drink or something to eat in the
refrigerator, they would open the refrigerator and the light of the
refrigerator would draw fire from snipers who were on the other side of
the border. Col. Tirza’s explanation in his graphic depiction of what was
part of the daily life of people living in that one neighborhood, gave me
an even greater appreciation for the imperative of the fence and the need
to do everything possible to protect
Israel
against these continuing attacks.
Nowhere in the world is the
responsibility that comes with freedom more on display than
Israel.
Israelis have long had to make sacrifices in order to achieve peace and
security. Too many young soldiers have been lost protecting the lives
and livelihoods of all of
Israel’s
citizens and too many innocent civilians have been killed during those
years. Now as a thriving democracy,
Israel
has no shortage of strong opinions, all of which get full hearing whether
it’s in a session of the Knesset or in a coffee shop in Tel Aviv. But
Israel
has also used its strengths to forge alliances throughout the world even
when those efforts have not always been welcome.
A perfect example of this is Magen David
Adom. I’ve long supported the MDA and for decades it was denied admission
to the International Committee of the Red Cross despite the fact it had
deployed its volunteers and resources to help victims of disaster
worldwide, whether victims of the tsunami in Southeast Asia or victims of
Hurricane Katrina right here in our own country. When I learned the MDA
was excluded from the ICRC, I was outraged by the injustice. And despite
its international, non-political, life-saving work, it was being singled
out because it was Israeli. So I joined with many of you in the struggle
to try to obtain recognition and we have been in this together for a
number of years, some of you for a long, long time. I worked with you to
advocate for full inclusion, I sponsored legislation placing limitations
on the
US
contributions to the ICRC until it recognized MDA. And after years of
brokering negotiations, and writing letters, and making calls, and passing
legislation, after years of urging the Swiss to find a solution to enable
the MDA full participation, all of our collective efforts finally paid off
when, this summer, the ICRC righted this historic wrong and admitted MDA
into the International Committee of the Red Cross.
When I was in
Israel
in 2002, I met a medic named Yohai Porat who was training international
volunteers in first aid. He was one of these young men who just drew you
to him. He was magnetic and I could see that these volunteers from the
United States,
from
Europe,
from
Latin America
were in awe of him. A few days after I left, while he was on IDF duty, he
was killed in a terrorist attack and I was fortunate during this last trip
a year ago to meet his parents who I had called to express my condolences
upon hearing of Yohai’s death and I told them how inspired I had been to
see him in action with these young people.
His spirit of service and dedication to
his country, his faith in humanity, permeates Israeli culture and is one
of many reasons that I have been, I am now, and I always will be proud
to stand with all of you as a strong supporter of Israel. Because we… We
believe that Israelis have the right to live in their country without the
constant threat of terrorism, war, and rocket fire. But as we face
these difficult times, we have to constantly be asking ourselves what is
the best strategy we can pursue to support
Israel,
to support our common values, to try to take on the challenges posed in
this increasingly dangerous and unstable world, particularly in the
Middle East.
I believe that, as I said many times before and as I repeat tonight, that
we in America, particularly our government have to be trying new tactics
in this endeavor to reign in terrorism, to prevent Iran from becoming a
nuclear power, to quell the influence of Hezbollah and Hamas.
There are no easy answers to the complex
situation we face today. I have advocated engagement with our enemies and
Israel’s
enemies because I want to understand better what we can do to defeat those
who are aiming their hatred, their extremism, their weapons at us. And I
believe we can gain valuable knowledge and leverage from being part of a
process again that enables us to get a better idea of how to take on and
defeat our adversaries.
This is a worthy debate to have in our
country today. There are many, including our President who rejects any
kind of process of any sort of engagement with countries like
Syria
and
Iran.
I do believe that that is certainly a good, safe position to take, but I
am not sure it is the smartest strategy that will take us to the goals
that we share.
It is a debate worth having because right
now we know that there are direct threats to
Israel,
to our young men and women in harms way in
Iraq,
to the very fragile democracy in
Iraq
and to the one in
Lebanon.
As bad as the situation looks to us today, it could become even worse. And
what do I mean by engagement or some kind of a process? Well I’m not sure
anything positive would come out of it, I have no expectations w! hatsoeve
r. But there are a number of factors that I think argue for some attempt
to do what I am suggesting: number one I don’t think we know enough about
how Iranian society and their government really functions. I was struck by
the rejection of the President’s party in those recent elections. If we
are having to pursue potential action against Iran beyond enforcing the
toughest sanctions that we can and bringing the world community along as
hard as it is, to recognize the danger to them as well as to us and to
Israel then I want to know more about the adversary we face. I want to
understand better what the leverage we can bring to bear on them will
actually produce. I want to get a better sense of what the real power
centers and influentials are.
And I also want to send a message if we ever do have to take war,
drastic action to the rest of the world that we exhausted all
possibilities because we need friends and allies to stand with us as we
stand with Israel in this long war against terrorism and extremism. I
talked with a number of you about how we best pursue our mutual goal of
reining in terrorism and extremism of protecting and guaranteeing the
security of
Israel,
of preventing a state that sponsors terrorism from becoming a nuclear
power. There are no good analogies that we can pull from history because
we’re living with new threats and asymmetric warfare and state actors and
non-state actors, each of whom have the potential to wreak such horrible
damage on innocents, but I suggest and hope you will consider thinking of
a smart way to pursue our interests and Israel’s at this dangerous time
that gives us both more information and more leverage.
Similarly with Syria which is becoming an even greater problem because of
its support for Hamas, because of its involvement in both Lebanon and Iraq
against Israeli and American interests, we also have to do more to figure
out what, if any real leverage we can bring to bear. And all during the
Cold War we met with the
Soviet Union
while they had thousands of missiles pointed at our cities while their
leaders threatened to bury us while they sowed discord and military
uprisings and actions against us and our allies. That was a smart strategy
even though it was a difficult one. Today we face a new set of dangers
that in some way are more difficult because we’re living in not a stable,
bipolar world, but living in an unstable, multi-polar world. And I think
you can send a very clear message to your enemies about what they will
face if they do not change while trying to figure how best to create
conditions internally and externally within those societies to cause that
change.
It is also important that we look at the
support of the American people for American leadership including military
leadership around the world. The problems that we face in
Iraq
today have certainly caused many Americans to move away from a belief that
the
United States
has a role in promoting freedom and democracy. If we withdraw from the
world, if we turn our back on the dangers we face that I believe will
cause problems for us and very big problems for
Israel.
We need American support first and foremost for American leadership in
combating the dangers of extremism and terrorism.
So as I look over the horizon, I think
we have undermined our leadership and our ability to maneuver
successfully in this increasingly dangerous world in a time when we are
needed more than ever. And we need to use every tool at our disposal
including diplomatic and economic in addition to the threatened use of
military force. There are no quick solutions for the difficulties we
face today, but we know that we have to stand with democracies and free
peoples against the threat of nihilism and extremism. That is why we
stand with Israel because it is a beacon of democracy in the region;
that is why we stand with Israel because its very existence is a defiant
affront to anti-Semitism; that is why we stand with Israel because in
defeating terror because Israel'’s cause is our cause. And that is why
we stand with
Israel
because of our shared values and our shared belief in the dignity of men
and women and the right to live without fear or oppression. And what we
must do is to think rationally and strategically about how our values,
our beliefs can be translated into effective action. It is not enough
for us to say the right things; we’ve got to be smart and tough enough
to do the right things that will protect American and Israeli interests
now and forever. Thank you all very much.
|
|
 |
| Earth, a planet
hungry for peace |
Apartheid
Wall
| |
 |
|
|
The
Israeli Land-Grab Apartheid Wall built inside the Palestinian
territories, here separating Abu Dis from occupied East
Jerusalem. (IPC, 7/4/04). |
 |
| The Israeli
apartheid (security) wall around Palestinian population centers in
the West Bank, like a Python. (Alquds,10/25/03). |
|