The Talmud, Racism, Hatred and Anti-Christism By John Anast

Al-Jazeerah Info Center needs your support

Readers are the only source of support for Al-Jazeerah

Send donations by Paypal or by check to: Al-Jazeerah Info Center, P.O. Box 724, Dalton, GA 30722-0724, USA.

The Talmud forms the religious training for Rabbis, observant and reformed Jews. Upon close examination is it clear that the Talmud not only supports racism and hatred, but is the source of hatred directed towards non-Jews.

American Christians need to reexamine their relationship with organized Jewry and insist that racist Talmudic teachings be removed from such offensive texts and that if necessary all Yeshiva's which teach and promote hatred and racism be closed in the United States and removed from US soil. Organized Jewry seems to feel that certain Islamic schools need to be addressed all over the world. It is therefore only fitting that Yeshiva's and its faculty and students in the United States be made to conform to the Christian doctrine of love and mutual respect.

It was Christ who pointed out that Phariseeism / Talmudism / Judaism is a religion based upon the instructions of men. Basically the Pharisee appointed themselves g-ds and taught and ruled as if they were man-g-ds. Several Talmudic passages which speak to this point are clearly found in Tractate Mechilla whereas, it says: " Yahweh Himself studies the Talmud standing, He has such respect for that book. " How blasphemous that any man or group of men would not only accept that nonsense but teach it to others in religious doctrine? In another tractate Mizbeach 13 Judaism teaches that " There is nothing superior to the Holy Talmud ". Who made the Talmud "holy"? Is it Torah or Law? In other words the Talmud is the Jewish law and like Zionism it has replaced Torah as the instruction book on how to live. I am sure that our Creator did not consult with any Rabbi or the Talmud before He created the universe. There is nothing superior to the Creator.

Not withstanding, the Talmudists place themselves not only above the Law but also disregard the Prophets of Yah as in Treatise Berachoth Judaism advises that " The words of the elders are better than the words of the prophets ". In contrast the New Testament which is made up mostly of Old Testament passages is a guide to the completion of the Law of our Creator. Christians believe Christ lived the Law in completion, without blemish, without flaw. I do not mean that Christ was a handsome fellow for certainly he was not. The basic tenant of Christianity is that our rescuer lived the Law and was without transgression therefore allowing His sacrifice to cover our transgressions. Christ was not a "revolutionary" or any other myriad of pejorative titles ascribed by men, he was and is a living example which example was and continues to be rejected by Judaism.

While the above are distinctions of religion and whereas reasonable men may differ in their opinions and beliefs the Talmud contains passages which are less academic and in fact form the basis of Talmudic hatred of all non-Jews. One of the most interesting passages in the Talmud is found in the book of Libbre David, 37, whereas, " To communicate to a Non-Jew about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all the Jews, for if the Non-Jews knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly." Christians and Muslims have to educate themselves to understand that Judaism is not only opposed to Christianity and Islam but teaches and advocates actions against all non-Jews including Christians -- as exemplified by the organized reaction of Jewry to the Mel Gibson film about the death of Christ. A Rabbi recently suggested that organized Jewry had erred in its frontal attack on the Gibson movie (which is likely to earn over $300 million), and should have instead employed Christians to critic the film. That remark sounds eerily similar to the strategy employed by the Pharisee negotiating with Pilot to murder Christ. Nonetheless, organized Jewry and organizations such as the Anti Defamation League, "ADL", as well as others, work daily against the rights of Christians, Muslims and every non-Jew. Recently a Christian couple, the Quigleys, from Colorado received in excess of $12 million dollars paid by the ADL which was caught defaming Americans again! In this particular case the ADL provided instructions to the Jewish neighbors of the Quigleys, to record their telephone conversations using scanning equipment and tape recorders. Every non-Jew must realize and understand that your Jewish friends and neighbors will report any behavior to their local Jewish organizations that they dislike or consider against the Jewish cause. It makes one of a litigious nature to pause to consider the possibilities.

In the same book Libbre David 37, Jews are instructed to lie about the Talmud -- and let us remember who the father of lies is, whereas, " If a Jewish is called to explain any part of the Rabbinical books, he ought to give false explanations, that he might not by behaving differently become an accomplice in betraying these information. Who will violate this law shall be put to death ". Therefore in religious matters expect no truth from any Rabbi. In order to hide their real beliefs many Talmudic books have been rewritten but there exists something called "Hesronot Shas" which is a compilation of the "omissions" which is used by Rabbis in secret. In order to hide their teachings the Talmudists use threats such as " It's forbidden to initiate a Non-Jew into the secrets of the law. The Jew who concerns himself with this is as guilty as if he laid waste the world and denied the sacred name of God ".

Christians and other non-Jews in the Talmud are described by various words including meanings for non-Jews as: "Abhodah Zarah, Akum, Obhde Elilim, Minim, Nokhrim, Edom, Amme Haarets, Goim, Apikorosim, Kuthrim" -- which are basically racial slurs and insults. In fact Edom which many might correspond to Edomites is used in passages directed towards Rome and the Emperor Constantine and to those who made the sign of the Cross. A Catholic scholar noted "...Since there are no longer any Edomites, Samaritans, et cetera and since there are many references in recent Jewish books to Samaritans, who can doubt that this does not mean the Christians? Furthermore, in this matter of naming those who are not Jews, it is to be particularly noted that Jewish writings apply these names indiscriminately and promiscuously when they speak of the same thing, and almost in the same words. For instance, in the Tract Abhodah Zarah (25b) the word Goi is employed, but in the Schulkhan Arukh (Iore Dea 153, 2) Akum is used. Kerithuth (6b) uses Goim; Jebhammoth (61a) uses Akum; Abhodah Zar. (2a) uses Obhde Elilim; Thoseph uses Goim and Obhde Ab., Choschen Ham (Venetian ed.) uses Kuthi; (Slav. ed.) Akum. And many more instances could be quoted. Maimonides in his book on Idolatry indiscriminately calls all the following idolaters: Goim, Akum, Obhde Kokhabhim, Obhde Elilim, etc..."

The importance of how non-Jews and specifically Christians are described is that there is a codified lack of respect for and an actual contempt for Christians and Christianity. Some of the most heinous passages with regard to Christians include Abhodah Zarah (26b, Tosephoth) it says: "Even the best of the Goim should be killed", and "'The Schulchan Arukh, after the words of Iore Dea (158, 1) that those of the Akum who do no harm to Jews are not to be killed, namely those who do not wage war against Israel, thus explains the word Milchamah - war: "But in time of war the Akum are to be killed, for it is written: 'The good among the Akum deserve to be killed, etc.'" So even the Christian Zionists as well as the Christian media lackeys are to be "killed". The notion goes a step further in Speher Or Israel (177b) the Talmud claims that killing a non-Jew is pleasing to G-d as a sacrifice -- it says: "Take the life of the Kliphoth and kill them, and you will please God the same as one who offers incense to Him." And in Ialkut Simoni (245c. n. 772) it says: "Everyone who sheds the blood of the impious is as acceptable to God as he who offers a sacrifice to God."

In Zohar (III, 227b) it even goes further as the Good Pastor says: "The only sacrifice required is that we remove the unclean from amongst us." Zhoar (II, 43a), explaining the precept of Moses about the redemption of the first born of an ass by offering a lamb, says: "The ass means the non-Jew, who is to be redeemed by the offering of a lamb, which is the dispersed sheep of Israel. But if he refuses to be redeemed, then break his skull....They should be taken out of the book of the living, for it is said about them: He who sins against me, I shall take out of the book of life." Judaism does not understand that Moshe (Moses) in the referenced passage is actually speaking about Christ Himself. Christ advised us that Moses talked about Him, and if they believed Moses they would believe Him. Instead Judaism in rejecting Moses and rejecting Christ places a racist antichrist meaning to pervert the truth. The above is one of the examples that Christ used to illustrate that the Pharisee were not following the Law of our Creator. For the Palestinians the above passage has much meaning and horror as they live the daily sacrifices perpetrated by the Israelis. Recently in the United States where Jewish population is limited, the daily sacrifices on Christianity and Christian values remain in movies, television, advertising and statues. The flap put forth by organized Jewry over the Gibson movie is a rare public look at how the Talmudists hate Christianity. In recent US Congressional action Jewish groups are pushing for passage of a law which would punish free speech on college campuses if that speech was critical of Israel. Christians must come to the realization that these are coordinated and organized actions against our Constitutional rights as Americans, which are perpetrated against us by Zionists seeking to control our very thoughts.

Another very interesting and equally heinous passage describes "heaven" for those who kill Christians and other non-Jews -- in Zohar (I, 38b, and 39a) it says: "In the palaces of the fourth heaven are those who lamented over Zion and Jerusalem, and all those who destroyed idolatrous nations...and those who killed off people who worship idols are clothed in purple garments so that they may be recognized and honored." How many Zionists have flooded the airways espousing falsely that Islam preaches any number of "virgins" for "martyrs"? Well Talmudism teaches a that a palace awaits a Jew in "heaven" who kills a non-Jew. Is it any wonder that we see the images of thousands of Palestinians being murdered in Palestine by Israelis with seemingly such satisfaction and pleasure? Is it any wonder that five (5) Israelis were photographed celebrating and filming the destruction of the World Trade Center on 11 September? Those same five Israelis who were photographed dancing and high-fiving each other during that tragic event were part of a larger group of Israelis spying in the United States. There were other Israelis also detained with box cutters, large amounts of cash and explosives.

The next passage from the Talmud explains all to well the attitudes and instructions of Talmudism in Hilhoth Akum (X, 1)it says: "Do not eat with idolaters, nor permit them to worship their idols; for it is written: Make no covenant with them, nor show mercy unto them (Deuter. ch. 7, 2). Either turn away from their idols or kill them." So are the complaints of organized Jewry against the Gibson film, "the Passion of the Christ" an attempt to obey the Talmud and deny Christians their faith and belief system? In the next passage the Talmud explains a phenomenon which is currently occurring in certain communities in America, whereas in communities where Jewish population is increasing relative to the local Christian population symbols of Christmas and Christianity are not allowed and in those school districts traditional Christmas songs during Christmas season are also not included -- Ibidem (X, 7): "In places where Jews are strong, no idolater must be allowed to remain..." The US Constitution provides for what is interpreted as freedom of religion and Christians have a right and obligation to observe their faith as they see fit. No religion has the right to deny Christians or Muslims their faith not even Talmudism. The basis for this type of racism and intolerance is the Talmudic teaching of placing the Christian and Muslim religions in a subservient role to Judaism? Goim or Christians are considered in the Talmud to minister to Jews like beasts of burden, belonging to a Jew together with his life and all his faculties: "The life of a Goi and all his physical powers belong to a Jew." (A. Rohl. Die Polem. p.20) It is an axiom of the Rabbis that a Jew may take anything that belongs to Christians for any reason whatsoever, even by fraud; nor can such be called robbery since it is merely taking what belongs to him." Could this be the basis for the billions of US Dollars which flow to support Israel's ethnic cleansing of Palestinians each year? It is also interesting to note certain tactics used by organized Jewry to attempt to harm non-Jews financially or to falsely accuse non-Jews or those critical of Israel as if further exemplified in Babha Bathra (54 b) it says: "All things pertaining to the Goim are like a desert; the first person to come along and take them can claim them for his own." It is no wonder than that Zionists continue to steal the land which belongs to the Palestinians which is Palestine. There are only about 5.4 million Jews in America today out a population of over 280 million, but somehow the rights of Christians are not considered by organized Jewry? Be that as it may the foundation of that racism is understood and equally understood is that the success of the Gibson film sets forth that America is a Christian Nation subservient to none.

There are other interesting passages in the Talmud with regard to dealings with Christians who are not put to death immediately. In Choschen Hammischpat (183, 7) it says: "If you send a messenger to collect money from an <1>Akum and the Akum pays too much, the messenger may keep the difference. But if the messenger does not know about it, then you may keep it all yourself." In Choschen Hamm. (266, 1) it says: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum, for it is written: Return to thy brethren what is lost (Deuter. XXII, 3). For he who returns lost property [to Christians] sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people."

In Babha Kama (113b) it says: "It is permitted to deceive a Goi." And in Choschen Hamm. (156, 5 Hagah) it says: "If a Jew is doing good business with an Akum it is not allowed to other Jews, in certain places, to come and do business with the same Akum. In other places, however, it is different, where another Jew is allowed to go to the same Akum, lead him on, do business with him and to deceive him and take his money. For the wealth of the Akum is to be regarded as common property and belongs to the first who can get it. There are some, however, who say that this should not be done." In Choschen Hamm. (183, 7 Hagah) it says: "If a Jew is doing business with an Akum and a fellow Israelite comes along and defrauds the Akum, either by false measure, weight or number, he must divide his profit with his fellow Israelite, since both had a part in the deal, and also in order to help him along." In other words according to the Talmud Christians have no rights and are fair game as somehow a Jew cannot transgress against a Christian or other non-Jew. The Talmud goes so far as to write that a Jew may disobey the law when regarding non-Jews In Iore Dea (157, 2 Hagah) it says: "If a Jew is able to deceive them [idolaters] by pretending he is a worshipper of the stars, he may do so."

In other issues as in Abhodah Zarah (54a) it says: "It is allowed to take usury from Apostates who fall into idolatry." And in Iore Dea (159, 1) it says: "It is permitted, according to the Torah, to lend money to an Akum with usury. Some of the Elders, however, deny this except in a case of life and death. Nowadays it is permitted for any reason." In the event you are unaware of it the US Dollars in your pocket are not yours nor do they belong to the US Government, those same Dollars are in actuality lent to you with usury by the Federal Reserve Bank which is a private corporation.

Somehow the Talmud recognizes that Jewry is in captivity to non-Jews as certainly Israel could not survive without US money and weaponry. In Abhodah Zarah (I, 2, fol. 7b) it says: "Since, while we are in captivity, we cannot live without trading with them, and we depend upon them for our food and we must fear them, it is only forbidden to trade with them on their feast days. Furthermore, it is permitted nowadays to trade with them on the actual day of their feasts, because the Rabbis are convinced that they do not worship their idols just because they trade with us. And what is forbidden in this book must be taken as applying directly to idolatry." "Rabbi Tam, however, contends that the Mischnah only forbids the selling of things to idolaters which will be used by them in the worship of idols, since they rejoice and worship their idols because they obtain the things necessary for that worship.

In the following passages the Talmud clearly describes non-Jews and the Vatican as the enemy of every Jew. "THESE PRINCES ARE TO BE KILLED FIRST for if they are allowed to live, the hope of the liberation of the Jews is in vain, and their prayers for release from this Fourth Captivity are of no avail. In Zohar (I, 219B) it says: "It is certain that our captivity will last until the princes of the gentiles who worship idols are destroyed." And again in Zohar (II, 19a) it says: "Rabbi Jehuda said: Come and see how it is; how the princes have assumed power over Israel and the Israelites make no outcry. But their rejoicing is heard when the prince falls. It is written that: the King of the Egyptians died and soon the children of Israel were released from captivity; they cried out and their voice ascended to God." "THE PRINCEDOM WHOSE CHIEF CITY IS ROME IS THE ONE TO BE HATED MOST OF ALL BY THE JEWS They call it the Kingdom of Esau, and of the Edomites, the Kingdom of Pride, the Wicked Kingdom, Impious Rome. The Turkish Empire is called the Kingdom of the Ismaelites which they do not wish to destroy. The Kingdom of Rome, however, must be exterminated, because when corrupt Rome is destroyed, salvation and freedom will come to God's Chosen People." Rabbi David Kimchi writes as follows: "in Obadiah what the Prophets foretold about the destruction of Edom in the last days was intended for Rome, as Isaiah explains (ch. 34, 1): Come near, ye nations, to hear . . . For when Rome is destroyed, Israel shall be redeemed." Rabbi Abraham also, in his book Tseror Hammor, section Schoftim, says the same: "Immediately after Rome is destroyed we shall be redeemed." Is it a coincidence that the Catholic Church has been soiled by one scandal after another, when many of the same offense committed by Rabbi's are unreported in major American media? Christians and even Catholics are complicit and should take note of one of the most amazing threats in the Talmud is In Zohar (1, 25b) it says: "Those who do good to the Akum . . . will not rise from the dead." "At times it is permitted to do good to Christians, but only in order to help Israel, namely, for the sake of peace and to hide hatred of them." The word "peace" obviously has a different meaning that the conventional definition. This passage seems to apply to the Zionist Christians and Christian media lackeys who support the Zionist cause while in reality to this day Christians as well as Muslims who live in Israel are persecuted and prevented from freely observing their religions. Other stark differences with Christianity which is a religion of love, forgiveness, and caring for others remain as Talmudism seems to reject the notion of the "good Samaritan". In Iore Dea (158, 1) it says: "The Akum are not to be cured, even for money, unless it would incur their enmity." In Orach Chaiim (330, 2) it says: "No help is to be given to an Akun woman in labor on the sabbath, even in a small way, for the Sabbath must not be violated." In Choschen Hamm. (425, 5) it says: "If you see a heretic, who does not believe in the Torah, fall into a well in which there is a ladder, hurry at once and take it away and say to him 'I have to go and take my son down from a roof; I will bring the ladder back to you at once' or something else. The Kuthaei, however, who are not our enemies, who take care of the sheep of the Israelites, are not to be killed directly, but they must not be saved from death." And in Iore Dea (158, 1) it says: "The Akum who are not enemies of ours must not be killed directly, nevertheless they must not be saved from danger of death. For example, if you see one of them fall into the sea, do not pull him out unless he promises to give you money." Maimonides, in Hilkhoth Akum (X, 1) says: "Do not have pity for them, for it is said (Deuter. VII, 2): Show no mercy unto them. Therefore, if you see an Akum in difficulty or drowning, do not go to his help. And if he is in danger of death, do not save him from death. But it is not right to kill him by your own hand by shoving them into a well or in some other way, since they are not at war with us."

In Maimonides in Hilkhoth Akum (X, 6) says: "Needy Gentiles may be helped as well as needy Jews, for the sake of peace..." In Iore Dea (148, 12 Hagah) it says: "Therefore if you enter a town and find them celebrating a feast, you may pretend to rejoice with them in order to hide your hatred. Those, however, who care about the salvation of their souls should keep away from such celebrations. You should make it known that it is a hateful thing to rejoice with them, if you can do so without incurring enmity." Does organized Jewry really hate Christians? Certainly the hatred of Zionists towards Palestinians and Arabs is clear. Are Christians just as hated, and is the move by Zionist and Jewish groups to label the Gibson film as unworthy and even "terrorism" a clear sign manifesting that hatred for Christians? The next passage sums up the Talmudic instruction: in Abhodah Zarah (20, a, Toseph) it says: "Do not say anything in praise of them, lest it be said: How good that Goi is!" In this way they explain the words of Deuteronomy (VII, 2) ... and thou shalt show no mercy unto them [Goim], as cited in the Gemarah. Rabbi S. Iarchi explains this Bible passage as follows: "Do not pay them any compliments; for it is forbidden to say: how good that Goi is." In Iore Dea (151, 14) it says: "No one is allowed to praise them or to say how good an Akum is. How much less to praise what they do or to recount anything about them which would redound to their glory. If, however, while praising them you intend to give glory to God, namely, because he has created comely creatures, then it is allowed to do so." How racist and exclusionary and wrong! It is interesting to note that Moshe (Moses) took for his wife a woman of color, which the Talmud and Judaism seems to overlook. But then again what Talmudism does not overlook it attacks. For example every interpretation in the Talmud regarding Christians seems to be orchestrated to place Phariseeism / Talmudism / Judaism above everything else even our Creator. In Hilkhoth Akum (V, 12) it says: "It is also forbidden to make mention of the Akum; for it is written (Exodus XXIII, 13):...and make no mention of other gods." In Iore Dea (146, 15) it says: "Their idols must be destroyed, or called by contemptuous names." Ibidem, (147, 5): "It is permitted to deride idols, and it is forbidden to say to a Goi: May your God help you, or I hope you will succeed." Rabbi Bechai, explaining the text of Deuteronomy about hating idolatry, says: "The Scripture taught us to hate idols and to call them by ignominious names. Thus, if the name of a church is Bethgalia - "house of magnificence," it should be called Bethkaria - an insignificant house, a pigs' house, a latrine. For this word, karia, denotes a low-down, slum place."

The more heinous descriptions of Christian theology is found in the following passages. The language is rather graphic and disgusting. "In numerous places ignominious names are given by the Jews to Christian things. It will not be out of place to list a few of these names which they give to things and persons which are held holy and dear by Christians, as follows: Jesus is ignominiously called Yeschu - which means, May his name and memory be blotted out. His proper name in Hebrew is Yahshua, which means Yah's Rescue." "MARY, THE MOTHER OF JESUS, is called Charia - dung, excrement (German Dreck). In Hebrew her proper name is Miriam. CHRISTIAN SAINTS, the word for which in Hebrew Kedoschim, are called Kededchim (cinaedos) - feminine men (Fairies). Women saints are called Kedeschoth, whores. SUNDAY is called the day of calamity. FEAST OF CHRISTMAS is called Nital, denoting extermination." "EASTER is not called by the proper name Pesach (Passover), but Ketsach, meaning a cutting down; or Kesach, a Gallows. A CHRISTIAN CHURCH is not called Beth Hattefillah, House of Prayer, but Beth Hattiflah, a House of Vanity, a House of Evil. THE GOSPEL BOOKS are called Aavon Gilaion, Books of Iniquity. CHRISTIAN SACRIFICES are called Dung Offerings. The sacrament of Baptism is describes by the Talmud in the following manner: in Iore Dea (151, 1, Hagah): "It is not permitted to sell water to an Akum if it is known that it will be made into Baptismal water." "'In the Jerusalem Talmud (fol. 13b) the following occurs: "He who sees them mezabbelim (excrementing - sacrificing) before their idol, let him say (Exod. XXII, 20): He that sacrificeth unto an idol shall be utterly destroyed." Rabbi Iarchi (referring to Num. XXV, 3) teaches that the Gentiles actually honor their God by excrementing before him."' "A CHRISTIAN GIRL who works for Jews on their sabbath is called a Schaw-wesschicksel, Sabbath Dirt."

Beyond the above vulgarities and racist depictions of Christians and Christian sacraments in the Talmud, other passages deal directly with other interactions. "A Jew is commanded to harm Christians wherever he can, both indirectly by not helping him in any way, and also directly by wrecking "their" plans and projects; neither must he save a Christian who is in danger of death" While the attempt to destroy the Gibson film, which will likely earn more then $300 million, failed it is interesting to question whether in fact the effort was part of Talmudic expression.

Another example of possible Talmudic expression could be in the propaganda used to promote the Iraq war likely best described in the Talmud by the following passages whereas, the Talmudists and those Zionists at Pentagon are not expected to be loyal to America. Recent evidence with regard to the now defunct Office of Special Plans at Pentagon and its organizers speak plainly and clearly to the fact that America was deceived into war -- as deception is first and foremost to be used against Christians as in Zohar (I, 160a) it says: "Rabbi Jehuda said to him [Rabbi Cezkia]: 'He is to be praised who is able to free himself from the enemies of Israel, and the just are much to be praised who get free from them and fight against them. 'Rabbi Chezkia asked, 'How must we fight against them?' Rabbi Jehuda said, 'By wise counsel thou shalt war against them' (Proverbs, ch. 24, 6). By what kind of war? The kind of war that every son of man must fight against his enemies, which Jacob used against Esau - by deceit and trickery whenever possible. They must be fought against without ceasing, until proper order be restored. Thus it is with satisfaction that I say we should free ourselves from them and rule over them." Is it not odd that Christians and Muslims are fighting each other for the benefit of Israel? Equally interesting is the fact to this very day in the service before Yom Kippur Jews around the world recite a prayer to relieve them from a future commitment made with any non-Jew.

The above which is a compilation from Christian and Catholic sources regarding the Talmud is necessary to understand and address the fundamental issues which America faces today. It is no wonder why there is no peace in the Middle East or why organized Jewry felt it necessary to challenge Christianity and question the Gibson film? That said, the reaction of organized Jewry seems in concert with Talmudic teachings and may even seem moral from that perspective albeit from a Christian or human perspective however, it is immoral and sub-human. There are other even more heinous passages from the Talmud which deal with children and Rabbi's which are especially repugnant as well as those which deal with spying on non-Jews. Organized Christian groups have to realize that whilst Christianity is not necessarily opposed to the expression of Judaism as it relates to Temple worship, certainly Talmudic doctrine is opposed to even the existence of Christianity and Christians themselves. For every Jewish and Zionist organization America needs two Christian organizations to protect the rights of Christians in every community and in the US Congress. A door has been opened with revelations regarding the Gibson movie and the organized effort to persuade Christians not to see the film including personal attacks on Mr. Gibson and his father. Recent newspaper articles in the US have suggested that Jewish movie "moguls" have decided not to back any additional projects which Gibson is associated with. Not sure Mr. Gibson cares as "the Passion of the Christ" will likely earn over a staggering $300 million. Nonetheless, Christian America which is made up of a majority of Americans should make a bolder statement than merely seeing the film, and that is to choose not see any movies these same Hollywood "moguls" make.