Al-Jazeerah, Opinion Editorials    

 

الجزيرة

News Archives 

Arab Cartoonists

Columnists

Documents

Editorials 

Opinion Editorials

letters to the editor

Human Price of the Israeli Occupation of Palestine

Islam

Israeli daily aggression on the Palestinian people 

Media Watch

Mission and meaning of Al-Jazeerah

News Photos

Poetry

Book reviews

Public Announcements 

   Public Activities 

Women in News

Cities, localities, and tourist attractions

 

   

-

Common agenda eludes Pakistan
By Farhan Bokhari, Gulf News

-



Pakistan's anti-U.S. politicians who promise to bring out a million people to protest Washing-ton's plans for attacking Iraq may be disappointed, though not without the opportunity to press their point.

As the world waits anxiously to know if the apparent inevitability of war is indeed going to play itself out, the anti-war demonstrations across Pakistan - the world's only Islamic country which is also a nuclear power - so far have only attracted a few thousand participants.

But for General Pervez Musharraf, Pakistan's military ruler and a close U.S. ally in the fight against terror, the modest numbers of protesters are hardly reassuring.

The passions surrounding the issue of Iraq are quietly visible across the streets of the country where many mainstream Paki-stanis are quick to denounce the planned attack on a fellow Islamic country.

Their reluctance in joining a street protest is as much a consequence of little confidence in anti-government leaders as the hope that a last minute development may well stop the coming war.

Will the Iraqi president Saddam Hussain choose to go into exile either voluntarily or per force of circumstances? Will the U.S. eventually submit itself to dissenting voices from Europe such as France and Germany and throw its weight behind keeping up the diplomatic pressure on Baghdad? Would Iraq suddenly spring a surprise in coming out with a comprehensive list of lethal weapons to the satisfaction of the United States, in a way that would prevent war?

In the minds of the Pakistani public, there are no clear answers to such questions, in sharp contrast to the western world where many conclude that a war will eventually come. Across mainstream Pakistan, many have chosen to wait in anticipation, hoping to see politics overtake war-mongering.

Ultimately though, if a U.S.-led attack followed by an invasion of Iraq takes place, Pakistan is likely to feel the consequences, not only in terms of regular and gradually swelling public protests, but possibly also fresh internal disruption such as armed attacks from members of dissident groups seeking out relatively unprotected targets.

The danger of such a fall out is sufficient to press home the message that complacency on the matter of Iraq is fraught with unforeseen dangers of the kind which must only undermine Pakistan's future prospects. Faced with the possibility of such insecurity, Pakistan is hardly prepared to fight unexpected unrest which may well coincide with militancy, as public anger demonstrates itself.

Confronted with tough choices, a country like Pakistan neither has the luxury of embracing easy solutions nor necessarily the choices with the assurance of keeping peace on the streets. If a U.S. dominated military alliance chooses to attack and capture Iraq with the agenda of ruling over the oil rich country for a period of time, a host of Islamic countries are set to witness protests, demonstrations and other forms of disturbances, with the promise to deepen the divide between the Islamic and the Western world.

To face the fallout, the broad contours of a so-called Iraq policy for countries such as Pakistan must be built upon the necessity of seeking a national political consensus backed by a credible reform agenda which sets the pace for new economic openings and societal trends.

In the end, managing the anger would be more about creating the hope for a better future rather than slapping measures for tough control.

In Pakistan's case, there's no doubt that the country's ruling élite who have traditionally dominated politics, the economy and society, have only left behind a trail of many misdeeds which have subsequently contributed to fuelling anger and frustration across the grass-roots.

It is not surprising that many lower and middle income Pakistanis quickly denounce promises of expected reforms from the country's past and present day rulers, recognising fully well that such leaders and their predecessors represent deeply held and long nourished vested interests.

How can the future be any different from the past? To that simple question from many Pakistanis there are as yet no compelling answers. For Mush-arraf, who has placed himself in an unassailable position, reinforcing his presidential authority with powers such as those of sacking the prime minister, there can be little success in pushing the country towards political stability unless backed by a new set of radical reforms.

Pakistanis who choose to take the protest route to vent their anger may include many who have no faith in the newly created parliamentary structure. The fall-out from last October's elections has left many Pakistanis clearly dismayed.

The emergence of a new ruling political coalition, placed in power amid allegations of support from Musharraf's government, has only reinforced the belief that the government has been installed for the president rather than the people. Such a new ruling structure suffers from a number of political deficiencies.

The new government severely lacks in its ability to embrace the cross-section of political groups including those in the opposition, as it operates in a highly polarised environment. Pakistan's opposition parties are eager to use every opportunity to malign and weaken the government even on matters of national importance, knowing fully well that they operate in a zero sum game where their strength must come at the expense of the government's weakening.

It's hardly surprising when Pakistanis find themselves disappointed at the very mention of national consensus surrounding a set of key main issues.

Unlike many other countries where, despite a sharp divide in politics, political groups find themselves uniting around a small group of core issues, Pakistan is still far from identifying such a common agenda.

To exacerbate matters further, the country's largely moribund economy provides little solace. In the past few weeks, unexpectedly heavy rainfall has provided some relief to the otherwise weak prospects for the economy. Pakis-tani officials now expect this year's economic growth rates to rise on the back of a larger production of wheat, thanks mainly to helpful rains.

Yet, this is also an example of how the foundations of the economy rest on tenuous footings, relying on events such as acts of nature rather than a strong recovery in the investment confidence, encouraging businessmen to make medium to long term investments in new business ventures and industries.

Pakistan suffers from a host of challenges on the economic front where compelling issues such as high unemployment, poverty, the presence of a large but nevertheless devitalised public sector and last but not the least, the obstructive nature of the government's bureaucracy, together undermine future prospects.

Turning around some of the most significantly regressive trends undermining Pakistan's economy must ultimately be a challenge for not only improving political stability but also unleashing a new reform agenda.

The outcome of such reforms could well be critical for setting a new course for Pakistan's society - a country of 140 million people where many still consider themselves either un-represented or under represented.

Across the country's neighbourhoods where tears are quietly shed on the upcoming Iraq tragedy, many Pakistanis are also faced with the virtual absence of government. For many of them, the profound question must be, where's the government in a country where political and economic discord has left behind a long trail of many official misdeeds.

In the heat of the moment as the discussion surrounding a post-war Iraq remains intense, it is possible that the long term agenda may well go completely off the radar screens of Pakistan's top policy planners.

Ultimately though, they would have to recognise that understanding the words not yet spoken out on the streets may well be the most significant aspect of their function in understanding Pakistan.

It's an example of an almost deafening silence speaking much louder than the claims from those who promise to lead a million people on to the streets of their country.


Farhan Bokhari is a Pakistan-based commentator who writes on political and economic matters. The writer can be contacted at fbokhari.opinion@gulfnews.com



http://www.aljazeerah.info

Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent Al-Jazeerah's.