|
Opinion Editorials |
|||
|
Human Price of the Israeli Occupation of Palestine Israeli daily aggression on the Palestinian people Mission and meaning of Al-Jazeerah Cities, localities, and tourist attractions
|
-
No Discussion of Iraq Without Palestine - Some of us have, thus far, resisted this call of the sirens. We have,
in small ways, crossed boundaries, entered the minds of “others”, and
found a deeper understanding of our common bonds and obligations to each
other. The challenge of this century is surely how to care about people
who lie beyond our fields of concern, people to whom we owe nothing or
even people who have long been our foes. Which reminds me. The papers should have blazoned this piece of news
but didn’t, so low is our esteem for such activities. This Thursday, a
British woman, Dr. Priscilla Elworthy of the Oxford Research Group, was
awarded the Niwano Peace Prize (100,000 pounds sterling) for her work on
the resolution of conflicts through non-violent means. She brings together
Chinese generals with Russian weapons designers, Pakistani and Indian
warmakers, and today has radical plans on unseating Saddam to which Tony
Blair should pay attention. There is nothing weak-livered about wanting to find non-violent, humane
slip roads to tackle the most intractable problems. It is a damn sight
harder than pure, simple loathing. For some years now I have been a member
of a small group that brings together Muslim, Jewish, Asian and black
Britons. We meet every six weeks and talk openly, often painfully, about
all the issues that divide us and which we know we can affect if we work
better together. And we have. We have helped refugee doctors to get
retraining, and helped to make sure that the Stephen Lawrence inquiry was
not left to gather dust. Two Jewish members have personally funded and
participated in projects to prove that Islamophobia is getting worse. (How
many Muslims have openly campaigned against the anti-Semitism that we all
know is freely traded in mosques and other places?) This is not interfaith
dialogue. Politicians, ministers too, have been invited for meetings, and
sometimes even more controversial people — representatives of the Nation
of Islam, for example. This is the place where I feel best understood and safe. I know that if
I ever need help or support outside my own family, these are the people
who will stand by me. The majority of them, at present, are Jewish,
because some non-Jewish people have gone on to jobs that do not allow such
informal attachments. But for the first time ever, I am worried that this
remarkable group will fragment. The political is pounding the personal so
mercilessly these days, I wonder if we can survive. Our alliances, painstakingly stitched together, are now stretched to
breaking point. Trust, which survived the blasts of the many wars in the
Middle East, the rise of fanatics — from George Bush and Sharon to the
Taleban — and, until now, the pending war against Iraq, is fragile and
frail today. I see a direct connection between what we are threatening to do to Iraq
and what we tolerate in Israel. I am becoming aware that this connection
worries the Jewish group members. To them, there are other evil regimes
(if I am honest, the vast number are in Islamic countries), and these
human rights abusers get off without a mention. They may have a point. But
as one of those Muslims who do not deny the right of Israel to exist (to
its pre-1967 borders) and who has always been openly critical of our own
societies, it is telling that today the iniquitous actions of Israel are
consuming me. They illustrate too blatantly the arrogance of leaders who
expect immunity because of the horrors of the Holocaust, the memories of
which they betray. I am not at all sure that my Jewish friends can
understand the depths of these feelings. I don’t bring them up because
our relationships feel too vulnerable suddenly. As my colleague Justin Huggler wrote in The Independent last week, as
the world obsesses about Iraq, Sharon is acting ever more like a licensed
psychopath. Some 600 or so Israelis have been murdered by Palestinians.
That is unequivocally condemned by me. But 2,000 or more Palestinians have
been massacred by the overwhelming force of the Israeli Army.
Palestinians, old and young, are subjected to humiliation, beatings and
torture, as was described in unbearable detail by Edward Said in a London
lecture this January. We know what we call anti-Jewish prejudices, but
what label do we give to the attitudes of some Jews toward Arabs, all of
whom are seen as vermin fit only for extermination? Arabs too are Semites,
so what do we call this Jewish hatred for other Semites? Gaza is under
siege and a dozen Palestinians have been killed because they were
suspected, yes suspected, of being Hamas activists. Now the US is naming Palestinian academics in the UK and the US,
pronouncing them terrorists without any proof. One of the victims of this
summary injustice is the academic Bashir Nafi, who lectures at the
University of London. His life is suddenly engulfed in suspicion. He may
or may not be involved in unsavoury activities. But this is a violation of
his rights. Aid agencies have called for our government to send food to
the starving people of Gaza, deliberately denied sustenance by a
government we do not condemn. But I do continually question myself in
feeling the way I do. Am I becoming more detached (for the first time in
my life) from the genuine alarm at what many decent Jewish people see as a
creeping anti-Semitism around the world? Is this evil once again uncorked
and is it now tolerated because of the dreadful policies of the Israeli
government? I think Linda Grant may be right when she points out in an essay in
Prospect that “Anti-Zionism, while not itself anti-Semitic, if pursued
vigorously by enough people, lays the foundations on which it becomes
possible to construct a political agenda in which Jews are principally
responsible for the world’s problems.” Many Jewish people feel uneasy about going on the anti-war marches for
this reason, and I understand this reluctance. Who would want to be out
there among millions fighting for justice for Iraqi people when all the
while placards accuse you of being a force of evil? I think anti-war march
organizers should have focused only on Iraq, because that is the absolute
priority. But when it comes to public discourse, you cannot have a credible
debate about Iraq without direct and intellectually honest comparisons
with Israel and other factors too, such as our complicity in keeping
double standards for the two countries and the terrifying ambitions of
Bush and Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz, the enthusiastic pro-war
American Jew. If we, progressive Muslims, Jews, Caribbeans and other
anti-racists, can’t stand the heat of this, if we fall apart over the
way the world seems to us today, then hope must itself have died.
Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent Al-Jazeerah's.
|