|
ÇáÌÒíÑÉ
Home
News
Archive
Arab
Cartoons
Columnists
Documents
Editorials
Opinion
Editorials
letters
to the editor
Human
Price of the Israeli Occupation of Palestine
Islam
Israeli
daily aggression on the Palestinian people
Media
Watch
Mission
and meaning of Al-Jazeerah
News Photo
Peace
Activists
Poetry
Book
reviews
Public
Announcements
Public
Activities
Women
in News
Cities,
localities, and tourist attractions
|
|
Iraq's SCIRI, caught between Tehran and Washington
Mahan Abedin,
The Daily Star, 8/19/03
One of the more encouraging features of the occupation of Iraq has been
Washington’s desire to co-opt the country’s Shiites into the post-Baathist
polity in a way that reflects their majority status. This has led the US
to deal with the most well-organized Shiite force in the country: the
Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI).
However, this uneasy alliance has been beset with problems from the start.
The raiding of numerous SCIRI offices and safe houses after the fall of
Baghdad came amid a general harassment of SCIRI cadres and sympathizers,
particularly members of its armed wing, the Badr Corps. Yet there are also
strong indications SCIRI will prove to be a reliable partner for the US as
it seeks to forge some kind of representative government in Iraq.
SCIRI grew out of a breakaway faction of the Al-Daawa Party. Ayatollah
Mohammed Baqir al-Hakim led the faction, which left Iraq in 1980 and
eventually settled in Iran. Hakim had been a member of Daawa since the
1960s and was imprisoned three times in the 1970s. In Iran, Hakim
established the Mujahideen fil-Iraq, which was renamed the Office for the
Islamic Revolution in Iraq in early 1981. This in turn metamorphosed into
SCIRI in November 1982.
SCIRI claimed to be a coalition of Islamic and national forces, but in
reality it was little more than a nucleus of old Daawa activists who
sought to challenge former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. It modeled
itself on a conventional liberation movement, developing both political
and military wings. At the beginning it was overwhelmingly dependent on
Iranian patronage, but it would be wrong to characterize the link as a
patron-client relationship. Influence was mutual as SCIRI gained
considerable sway in the commanding heights of the Iranian state. A
noteworthy example was Ayatollah Mahmoud Shahrudi, who was a senior leader
of SCIRI in the 1980s and is currently the head of Iran’s judiciary.
On the political front, SCIRI failed to score significant points against
the Baathist regime. Its open alliance with Iran during the Iran-Iraq war
caused enormous damage to its credibility inside Iraq. Even within the
Shiite community, SCIRI came to be seen, undeservedly, as an Iranian
quisling. Its lack of a presence in Iraq was debilitating and the Baath
regime’s intelligence apparatus easily contained whatever influence the
SCIRI commanded.
Militarily, SCIRI did not perform much better. The problem was rooted in
the council’s desire to develop a conventional military rather than
clandestine guerrilla force. Iran’s Revolutionary Guards selected and
trained Badr units, and strong ties have persisted between the
organizations for more than two decades. Indeed, SCIRI participated in the
war against Iraq alongside the guards. Its units were deployed in bases in
Iran’s western Khuzistan, Ilam and Kermanshah provinces, and its main
training center was located in a Revolutionary Guard center outside Dezful.
The Badr corps boasted a 15,000-man army, but in reality only 5,000 of
these were professionally trained fighters. The uselessness of SCIRI’s
armed wing was underlined during the March 1991 uprising against the Baath
regime: Badr units were unable to participate effectively as they lacked
clandestine resources in the southern and central Iraqi Shiite heartlands.
Ideologically, SCIRI is committed to the Velayat-e Faquih doctrine
prevailing in Iran, which mandates clerical intervention in political
affairs. Its strong Iranian links have ensured that some former and
current SCIRI leaders and cadres are loyal to the theocratic component of
the Islamic Republic. Indeed SCIRI publications, particularly those
connected to its armed wing, regularly publish photographs and sayings of
Iranian supreme leader Ali Khamenei, and refer to him by the superfluous
title “leader of the Muslim umma.” Hakim is usually present during
Khamenei’s important speeches, nodding approvingly from the back rows.
Despite such behavior, SCIRI representatives take pains to assert they are
not interested in establishing a theocracy in Iraq. Spokesmen have the
unenviable task of reconciling the organization’s ideology with its
practical agenda. Recently, SCIRI pledged its allegiance to a democratic
system in Iraq. One of the council’s most erudite and articulate
representatives, the UK-based Hamid al-Bayati, said in a May 2003
interview that a Shiite-led theocracy was inappropriate as it would not
fully represent Iraq’s diverse communities. This is likely a genuine
reflection of current SCIRI thinking. It must be remembered that despite
its clerical core, SCIRI has in recent years developed a professional and
technocratic cadre. Moreover its presence in Iraq will likely result in
its coming under the influence of the Najaf religious schools which
have historically opposed Velayat-e Faquih.
Saddam Hussein’s downfall compelled SCIRI and the US occupation
administration to work together. The US initially sought to curtail the
activities of the Badr Corps by preventing its fighters from crossing the
Iranian border. Politically, however, it gave SCIRI free rein, as
evidenced by Hakim’s historic return in April. Still, the Bremer
administration remains suspicious of the council and its allies. These
tensions are unlikely to result in a significant rupture. SCIRI’s ties
with Iran form the basis of US reservations, but this influence is likely
to wane as SCIRI finds it expedient to distance itself from Tehran.
Moreover, SCIRI has had links with Washington since 1993, therefore is by
no means unfamiliar to the US.
The US will have to deepen its relations with SCIRI if it is to end the
marginalization of Iraq’s Shiites. This is largely dependent on engaging
the forces representing the community. In the absence of viable
alternatives, SCIRI represents a smart choice. Daawa is also currently a
US ally, but it is too small, fractured and secretive to play a
significant role in Iraqi politics.
More ominously, the continuing US presence in Iraq could propel the
movement led by the young cleric Muqtada al-Sadr into armed confrontation
with coalition forces. SCIRI will be a very useful US ally in the face of
such an eventuality. The upshot is that the US and SCIRI are likely to
forge an ever closer relationship.
Mahan Abedin, a London-based financial consultant and analyst of
Iranian politics, wrote this commentary for THE DAILY STAR
|
|
 |
| Earth, a planet
hungry for peace |
 |
| The Israeli
apartheid (security) wall around Palestinian population centers
(Ran Cohen, pmc, 5/24/03). |
|
 |
| The Israeli
apartheid (security) wall around Palestinian population centers in
the West Bank (Ran Cohen, pmc, 5/24/03). |
|
|