|
ÇáÌÒíÑÉ
Al-Jazeerah.Home
News Archive
Arab
Cartoons
News Photo
Columnists
Documents
Editorials
Opinion Editorial
letters
to the editor
Human
Price of the Israeli Occupation of Palestine
Islam
Israeli
daily aggression on the Palestinian people
Media
Watch
Mission
and meaning of Al-Jazeerah
Peace Activists
Poetry
Book
reviews
Public
Announcements
Women
in News
Cities,
localities, and tourist attractions
|
|
,
Sharon
Defies Bush on Settlement Expansion, Qurei
Categorically Refuses Continued Presence of Jewish Settlements
in Palestinian Occupied Territories
13/04/2005
Palestine Media Center – PMC
As Israel’s Premier continued to defy the US President’s warnings to
freeze all Jewish settlement expansion in the Occupied Palestinian
Territory (OPT) as stipulated under the “roadmap” peace plan,
Palestinians voiced their anger at Bush’s “legitimization” of
Israel’s settlement activity as work on expanding the colony of
“Maale Adumim” in eastern Jerusalem continued unabated.
Workers were hard at work on Tuesday expanding the illegal West Bank
Jewish settlement of “Maale Adumim” in eastern Jerusalem.
The only overt disagreement between Bush and Sharon during their summit
meting in Texas on Monday was on the Israeli plan to build 3,500 settler
housing units between “Maaleh Adumim” and Jerusalem.
Bush publicly reminded Sharon three times at their summit in Texas that
Israel was obliged to freeze all settlement activity, according to
Israel’s “roadmap” obligations.
Sharon said that Israelis “are very much interested (in having)
contiguity between Maaleh Adumim and Jerusalem,” adding that: “The
major Israeli population centers in (the West Bank) Judea and Samaria
will be part of the State of Israel.”
“Maale Adumim” is a biblical name meaning “red cliffs.” The Wall
Israel is building on occupied Palestinian land puts “Maaleh Adumim”
on the “Israeli” side, dividing occupied east Jerusalem further from
the West Bank.
Israeli government spokesman Avi Pazner said Tuesday the decision to
expand the settlement was taken in light of an agreement laid out in a
letter given by Bush to Sharon on April 14 last year, in which the US
President signaled his clear support for Israel to hold on to large West
Bank settlement blocs within the framework of a final status agreement.
Speaking to the French daily Le Figaro, Pazner said Bush’s remarks at
the summit were unlikely to stop the expansion of “Maaleh Adumim” or
stand in the way of plans to link the settlement with Jerusalem, which
lies some five kilometers (three miles) away.
“Sharon explained that what we are doing is within the agreement we
have with the United States,” he said, admitting there was “slight
disagreement on the interpretation” of the accord.
PM Qurei: We Categorically Refuse Jewish Settlement Blocs
Palestinian Prime Minister Ahmad Qurei said Tuesday the Palestinians
categorically reject the continued presence of large Jewish settlement
blocs inside the occupied West Bank after Washington reportedly agreed
to endorse their retention by Israel.
At a joint press conference with Sharon on Monday, Bush said that,
“changes on the ground, including existing major Israeli population
centers, must be taken into account in any final status negotiations.”
“New realities on the ground make it unrealistic to expect that the
outcome of final status negotiations will be a full and complete return
to the armistice lines of 1949. It is realistic to expect that any final
status agreement will be achieved only on the basis of mutually agreed
changes that reflect these realities. That’s the American view. While
the United States will not prejudice the outcome of final status
negotiations, those changes on the ground, including existing major
Israeli population centers, must be taken into account in any final
status negotiations,” Bush elaborated.
Bush is neither entitled nor mandated by any Palestinian to cede
Palestinian land and legitimize its annexation by the occupying power of
Israel.
“We categorically refuse these settlement blocs, especially those
around Jerusalem, such as ‘Maaleh Adumim’ and ‘Pisgat Zeev,’”
Qurei told reporters at the opening of the weekly cabinet meeting.
“This is Palestinian land which was occupied in 1967. The results of
negotiations on the final status (of the Occupied Territories) should
not be determined in advance.”
Qurei, however, took heart from comments by the US president when Bush
warned Sharon against carrying through his plan to build 3,500 new
settler homes at “Maaleh Adumim” in contravention of the
“roadmap” peace plan.
“We hope that the Israeli government will submit to this without
delay,” he said.
US Has to Define What it Means by a Palestinian State
Qurei told reporters in the West Bank city of Ramallah that while the US
Administration is speaking about a Palestinian state, it has failed to
define what it meant exactly by that state.
“Doesn’t a state mean security, borders, stability and the
non-existence of settlements?” Qurei asked.
“President Bush’s remarks about Israel’s right to maintain the
Jewish settlements does not serve the peace process and cannot possibly
lead to a just settlement,” he added.
He urged the US Administration and the Arab world to consider Jerusalem
“as a red line and forbid the expansion of settlements around it.”
Palestinian Officials Criticize Ambiguous US Policy
Similarly, two senior Palestinian officials criticized Washington’s
ambiguous policy.
Chief Palestinian Negotiator Saeb Erakat told CNN Tuesday that he thinks
talks between Bush and Sharon demonstrate that the Palestinians are not
being viewed by the United States in the way they should.
He told reporters that if the US is going to “go back to the old
broken record of blaming the Palestinian leaders as they did [in the
time of late Palestinian leader Yaser] Arafat, saying that we are not
doing enough, I think we are doomed. That must stop.”
Erakat called on the Quartet to send monitors to Israel, “so they can
be my judge and Israel’s judge.”
Palestinian Minister of Civil Affairs Mohammad Dahlan also criticized
the ambiguity of the US policy and said that the Bush administration is
ridiculing the Palestine National Authority (PNA).
In an interview with a newspaper from the United Arab Emirate, Dahlan
charged that Washington has no definitive policy towards the PNA, and is
not supporting the Palestinian leadership as it said it would.
Meanwhile, member of the PLO Executive Committee Hanna Amira, the
Islamic Resistance Movement “Hamas,” member of Fatah’s Central
Committee Abbas Zaki, leader of the People’s Party Bassam Al-Salhi,
the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) and several
other Palestinian political and national leaders on Tuesday rejected the
US President’s policy on Israeli settlements.
Peace Now: Expansion of ‘Maale Adumim’ Continuing
On Tuesday, finishing touches were being put on new settler apartment
buildings at the edge of “Maaleh Adumim,” occupied by 30,000 illegal
Jewish settlers.
Large cranes carried equipment on and off the buildings, bulldozers
removed rubble, workers in yellow hard hats put down cement bricks, and
the sound of banging hammers echoed in the air.
A tour of “Maaleh Adumim,” organized on Tuesday by the Israeli
settlement watchdog Peace Now, showed that Israel is already clearly
flouting the roadmap’s call to freeze all settlement activity.
In an area known as E1 on the northwestern outskirts of “Maaleh Adumim,”
a project to build another road alongside an existing highway from
Jerusalem to the Dead Sea is well under way. Workmen have already cut
the surface of around two kilometers of the road, and covered some 300
meters (yards) with tarmac.
“Yesterday, (Israeli Defense Minister) Shaul Mofaz told us that there
were still four more administrative stages to go through before any
construction work could begin,” said Ran Cohen, a deputy for the
left-wing Yahad party during the tour.
“This road is proof that construction has already begun.”
Cohen said the expansion of “Maale Adumim” was clearly designed to
cut the southern West Bank off from the north, thus imperiling the
much-talked of territorial contiguity which all sides say is needed for
a viable Palestinian state.
“The extension of ‘Maaleh Adumim’ in the area between Jerusalem
and the settlement will cut off the circulation between the north and
south of the West Bank,” he said.
According to Yuli Tamir, a deputy for the center-left Labor, such an
extension risks upsetting a political consensus on the left and right
within Israel to include ‘Maaleh Adumim” inside the borders of
Israel in any final status agreement.
“By trying to swallow too much all at once, Sharon risks calling into
question the future of everyone in ‘Maaleh Adumim’. It is
irresponsible,” said Tamir, whose party is the second largest in the
governing coalition.
In the east of the settlement, work is also continuing on a new illegal
settler neighborhood so-far known merely as 07 where builders were
putting the finishing touches to a series of three to five-storey houses
which are soon to be inhabited by buyers taking advantage of cheap
prices so close to Jerusalem.
“These places are going for half the price that one would find in
Jerusalem and it’s only 10 minutes from the center of town,” said
Cohen.
“Any project of this kind will only maintain the Palestinians’ sense
of distrust and undermine (Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas) Abu
Mazen at the hands of his own people,” he added.
“This will prevent the Palestinians from thinking that there is an
Israeli partner (in the peace process), encourages terrorism and
bolsters those who argue that there is no possibility of any
agreement.”
Secretary-General of the Palestinian Cabinet Samir Hleila told the
“Voice of Palestine” radio station on Monday that Israel does not
want a Palestinian partner in the peace process and insists to move
forward unilaterally.
|
|
 |
| Earth, a planet
hungry for peace |
Apartheid
Wall
| |
 |
|
| The
Israeli Land-Grab Apartheid Wall built inside the Palestinian
territories, here separating Abu Dis from occupied East
Jerusalem. (IPC, 7/4/04). |
 |
| The Israeli
apartheid (security) wall around Palestinian population centers in
the West Bank, like a Python (Alquds, 1/25/03. |
|
|
|