September 29, 2002 News

 

Al-Jazeerah Arabic  الجزيرة

Arab Cartoonists

Articles

Columnists

Contact us

Documents

Editorials 

Essays

Human Price of the Israeli Occupation of Palestine

Islam

letters to the editor

Media Watch

Mission and meaning of Al-Jazeerah

News Photos

News Archives 

Opinion Editorials

Poetry

Women in News

 

 

Iraq is not Afghanistan, warns Mubarak

 Jordan Times, 9/28/02

CAIRO (AP) — Saying Iraq is not Afghanistan, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak warned on Thursday that a war between Iraq and the United States would be disastrous for the whole world.

In remarks following a short trip to Saudi Arabia for talks with Crown Prince Abdullah on the US-Iraqi standoff, Mubarak urged the world to "deal seriously with the situation in order to avoid an explosion" in the Middle East.

"Iraq is not Afghanistan neither in its geography nor in its position or in its people," Mubarak said in the statement carried by the Middle East News Agency. "The world should understand this and try to avoid plunging into a war for narrow interests.

"War is an enormous catastrophe and it will not only affect the region but its consequences will spread to engulf the whole world," Mubarak was quoted as saying.

Mubarak, a close US ally, has joined other Arab leaders in warning a US strike on Iraq would destabilise the entire region. But many analysts believe his warnings are mostly crafted for domestic consumption in face of opposition by Islamic and pan-Arab activists to the US threats.

This month the pro-government newspaper Al Ahram quoted his foreign minister, Ahmed Maher, as saying that while Egypt was still opposed to an attack on Iraq, it would go along if the United Nations endorsed such action.

On Wednesday Mubarak travelled to Riyadh to discuss the volatile situation after he received a message from President Saddam Hussein.

Mubarak said he urged Saddam in response to fully comply with all UN resolutions related to Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and give unfettered access to arms inspectors authorised to destroy them.

If you do not have weapons of mass destruction then why you are afraid of giving inspections a chance, Mubarak said he told Saddam's envoy, Iraqi Foreign Minister Naji Sabri.

Mubarak's meeting with the Saudi de facto ruler tackled the deteriorating situation in the Middle East and the "accelerating events that could result in unfavourable endings," the official Saudi news agency reported.

Egyptian officials said Mubarak plans to visit other Arab capitals for similar talks, but declined to give further information.

Saudi Interior Minister Prince Nayef told reporters in Riyadh that the United States is applying double standards, banning Iraq and other Arab countries from acquiring weapons of mass destruction while allowing Israel to possess them.

"Israel, which threatens the security of the region and the world, owns and has those weapons," Nayef told reporters on Wednesday, adding the kingdom was against any country possessing weapons of mass destruction.

Israel has neither signed the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty nor opened its facilities to international inspection. The Israeli government refuses to discuss its nuclear capability but the CIA has estimated Israel has between 200 and 400 nuclear weapons.

Mubarak's shuttle diplomacy comes amid increasing US lobbying for a UN Security Council resolution authorising an attack on Iraq if Saddam fails to comply with previous UN resolutions and cooperate with UN weapons inspectors.

US President George W. Bush, who has made Iraqi "regime change" his administration's policy, is threatening to act even without UN backing.

The United States accuses Iraq of stockpiling weapons of mass destruction and harbouring terrorists and has said Saddam should be toppled.

 


Old enemies Iraq, Iran to hold talks

Jordan Times, 9/28/02 
TEHRAN (R) — Iran, keen to avert war in neighbouring Iraq, said on Thursday it was to hold talks with foreign ministers from both its old enemy Baghdad and Washington's closest ally Britain.

Iran fought a bitter eight-year war with Iraq in the 1980s and is no friend of President Saddam Hussein, but it fears an attack on Baghdad by its arch-foe the United States could dangerously destabilise the Middle East.

Iraqi Foreign Minister Naji Sabri is due in Iran on Sunday in a visit seen as a bid to muster Iranian support against possible US strikes on Baghdad.

"Different foreign groups will visit Iran in the coming days, of which Sabri's visit on Sunday is one of them," foreign ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi told Reuters on Thursday.

Along with North Korea, Iran and Iraq have been branded by US President George W. Bush as part of an "axis of evil" for allegedly developing weapons of mass destruction.

But that label has not stopped British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw from planning his third trip to Tehran in a year.

Asefi said Straw's visit "will not coincide with the Iraqi minister" and was not expected to take place until October.

Britain and other European Union countries, in contrast to US hostility, have sought to engage Iran in an effort to bolster reformists' efforts to modernise the Islamic Republic.

Straw's previous visits came as conflict was brewing in Afghanistan to the east of Iran. Tehran's neutrality in that war was seen as vital to US-led efforts to topple the Taleban.

Kuwaiti Defence Minister Sheikh Jaber Al Hamad Al Sabah is also due to arrive in Iran at the weekend. Diplomatic sources say the Gulf state could be a possible broker between Tehran and Washington, which broke ties after the 1979 Islamic revolution.

Analysts say Washington is keen to gauge Iran's likely attitude to a potential effort to overthrow Saddam.

Iran's reformist Vice President Mohammad Ali Abtahi, while calling on Iraq to comply with UN resolutions, told Reuters this week Iranians would prefer any regime in Iraq to Saddam.

Nevertheless, conservatives have maintained their hardline anti-American rhetoric. Many Iranians fear they could be Washington's next target in the US-declared war on terrorism.

Iran's Revolutionary Guards chief, appointed by Iran's most powerful figure Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said Tehran would make Washington regret any attack on Iran.

"Americans, under Zionist influence, are aiming to change the region's political geography, and possibly America will attack Saudi Arabia, Syria and Iran after Iraq," the Jam-e-Jam daily on Thursday quoted guards chief Rahim Safavi as saying.

He said a US attack on Iraq would cost Washington dearly.

"Based on news about Iraqi forces' arrangements, we predict this war will last a long time and American forces will face heavy damage," Safavi said. "Probably America's ground forces are going to attack Iraq from Turkey and Kuwait.

 


Teenager killed on Intifada anniversary

Khaleej Times, 9/29/02

GAZA CITY - A teenage demonstrator was killed in clashes with the Israeli army yesterday as thousands of Palestinians marked the second anniversary of their intifada, or uprising, against Israeli occupation.

Arabs also demonstrated inside Israel and peace activists were due to lead rallies in major cities, as the security services went on high alert for fear of anniversary attacks by Palestinian militant groups. Mohammad Abu Ajwa, 17, was killed when a group of young Palestinians, who had just attended a commemorative demonstration in the Gaza Strip town of Deir el-Balah, clashed with Israeli soldiers manning a position near the adjacent Jewish settlement of Netzarim, Palestinian security sources said. His funeral in the refugee camp of Al Bureij was attended by 1,000 people.

Three more Palestinians were wounded in the same incident, while similar clashes left seven youths hurt near Beit Lahia and three in Khan Yunis following a 3,000-strong demonstration, Palestinian medical and security sources said. Meanwhile, a local leader of the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, an armed offshoot of Yasser Arafat's Fatah movement, was shot dead in a chance killing in his home in the Gaza Strip early yesterday as Israeli troops fired on buildings in the area, witnesses said.

Sami Attullah Abed Elal, 25, died after being hit in the chest by bullets fired from a tank operating in the eastern Salam district of Rafah, a town on the border with Egypt, his brother told reporters. The two men had gone on to the roof of their home to watch Israeli tanks which they had heard moving nearby, Zakharia Abed Elal said. "We saw two tanks near the border and we heard shooting. Suddenly my brother fell down and I told him not to joke about.

"But then I saw he was all covered in blood, so I took him to the hospital." His brother was pronounced dead on arrival. Fatah later issued a statement saying one of its members had been killed. And in an announcement made over loudspeakers in Rafah, the Al Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades sent condolences for the death of Abed Elal, who it said was one of its militants.

The violence marred the celebrations in the Gaza Strip, where the biggest event was a 20,000-strong march through Gaza City, during which besieged Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat addressed the crowd by phone from his battle-scarred Ramallah office. "We want to defend our holy places, both Christian and Muslim, to defend Jerusalem and every centimetre of our land. Our resolution will continue and we will be the winner, the victory will be ours," Mr Arafat told the crowd.

Among the sea of Palestinian flags held aloft by demonstrators could also be seen many keffiyahs as people chanted: "We will support our president from siege to siege." - AFP

 


Mass protest in UK against Blair, Bush

Khaleej Times, 9/29/02

LONDON - Waving anti-war banners and chanting slogans against 'Bomber Bush and Bomber Blair', tens of thousands of Britons flocked to a vast peace rally in London yesterday to oppose a possible military strike on Iraq.

Joint organisers Stop the War Coalition and the Muslim Association of Britain estimated more than 350,000 people took part in the rally at Hyde Park and a preceding march from the River Thames near the British parliament. Police put numbers lower, at 150,000. But that would still make it probably the biggest peace rally in Britain since a huge anti-nuclear demonstration in 1981 drew a quarter of a million.

Myriad groups and personalities backed the march - from 'rebel' members of the ruling Labour Party and the mayor of London, to trade unions, religious leaders, artists,pop stars, rights activists and Gulf War veterans. "Our message to the US and British governments is that they would be very foolish to defy a coalition of this breadth and diversity. Just sticking a UN fig leaf on this does not make it any more humane," Stop the War spokesman Mike Marqusee said as the march began soon after midday.

"It's the biggest peace protest in Europe for years." Not surprisingly, protesters directed their wrath at US President George W. Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair, America's closest ally in the build-up of pressure on Iraq. Washington and London are trying to get through the UN Security Council a tough resolution which would give Iraq one week to accept demands to disarm and 30 days to declare all its weapons of mass destruction programmes.

'Bomber Bush, Bomber Blair, we'll resist you everywhere!' chanted students. Effigies parodied the pair as war-mongers. Protesters shouted 'shame' as they passed Mr Blair's residence. "Hopefully our leaders will see the huge feeling against the war," said Anne Gleeson, a school catering assistant marching with her husband and two children. All wore Palestinian scarves.

The demonstrators were rallying under two main slogans - 'Don't Attack Iraq' and 'Freedom for Palestine'. Ismail Adam Patel, head of the Muslim group Friends Of Al'Aqsa, said the two issues were inextricable. "Until we solve the Palestine issue, we are not going to get any peace in the Middle East. Why are we going after Iraq when Israel has far more weapons of mass destruction?" he said at the march.

Thousands of Muslims, from Britain's 2.5 million-strong Islamic community, joined yesterday's march. Many protesters, from all strata of society, brought children. Some Church of England ministers were also dotted among the demonstrators. Polls show most of Britain's 60 million people oppose their nation joining a purely US-led attempt to topple President Saddam Hussein. But the picture changes if the United Nations approves such action, with about two-thirds then in favour.

Most of Mr Blair's critics dislike Saddam as much as the prime minister does, but they say a war on Iraq would be an unjustified aggression that would destabilise the Middle East, cement US hegemony and snub international public opinion. Opponents also say Washington and London are behaving hypocritically given their previous support of Iraq under Saddam in the years before the 1991 Gulf War, and are refusing to admit their real economic motives for wanting to control Iraqi oil. "Clearly it's about oil and US dominance," film-director Ken Loach said on the march. - Reuters

 


Russia firm after Iraq talks with US envoy

Khaleej Times, 9/29/02

MOSCOW - Russia stood firm yesterday in calling for the rapid return to Iraq of UN arms monitors after talks with a US envoy urging Moscow to back a tough, new Security Council resolution already denounced by Baghdad.

Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov restated Russia's position that only the inspectors could determine whether Iraq held weapons of mass destruction. But Russia, he said, was prepared to listen to the viewpoints of other Security Council members. "Our position is that UN weapons inspectors should return to Iraq as quickly as possible," Mr Ivanov said in comments broadcast on television. "The necessary conditions for this exist. But we are prepared to look carefully at the position of all the members of the UN Security Council."

Russian President Vladimir Putin and Mr Ivanov have said Iraq's agreement this month to allow UN arms inspectors back into the country is sufficient to avoid any use of force. Moscow says a British report issued this week contained no 'clear proof' that Iraq held dangerous weapons. Mr Ivanov steered clear of criticising the new resolution after 90 minutes of talks, but said Russian experts were discussing it with US and British officials.

US Undersecretary of State Marc Grossman, who made little headway in trying to persuade France to back the new resolution on Friday, made no reference to the new US-drafted resolution. He said he was pleased Russia, like other members of the Security Council, believed Iraq posed a 'challenge' to be resolved.

"I think it is fair to say everybody agreed there was a challenge to the United Nations, to the Security Council, and that all of us who are permanent members...want to see if we can solve it," Mr Grossman told reporters. "I was very pleased to hear that." The current version of the resolution, distributed at the United Nations on Friday, would give Iraqi President Saddam Hussein seven days to accept demands to disarm and 30 days to declare all weapons on his territory.

Iraq served notice that it had no intention of accepting the new resolution. Deputy Prime Minister Tareq Aziz said the United States faced a 'fierce war' if it attacked. Iraq agreed this month to readmit the inspectors, last in Baghdad in 1998, but said their mission would be strictly in accordance with existing resolutions and what it said were understandings with UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan.

After Mr Grossman's talks in Paris on Friday, French officials said President Jacques Chirac had stood by an alternative plan to submit two resolutions to the Security Council - one on readmitting arms inspectors and a second providing for tough measures only if they met difficulties.

Mr Grossman was accompanied to Paris and Moscow by Peter Ricketts, political director of Britain's Foreign Office, who made little comment on the talks. Mr Ricketts said all five permanent Security Council states were studying the British document.

Russia, hoping eventually to cash in on oil deals in Iraq, has said a clean bill of health would be a first step to lifting sanctions imposed on Baghdad during the 1991 Gulf War.

The United States has said it wants Saddam removed from power and sees a new UN Security Council resolution as a means of adding legitimacy to any armed strike on Baghdad. - Reuters

 


Religious party gets a boost in Morocco polls

Khaleej Times, 9/29/02

RABAT - The sole Islamist party in Morocco's parliament yesterday claimed a strong position in general elections ahead of official results, saying it was confident it would be among the top three. Abdelilah Benkirane, a leader of the moderate Justice and Development Party (PJD), told journalists he expected his group to take 40 to 50 of the 325 seats in the Chamber of Representatives. The fate of the Islamists was being watched with keen interest in this election.

The poll, the first since King Mohammed came to the throne in 1999, is seen as a key test of the country's progress towards democracy. Voters in the north African nation voted on Friday to elect a new parliament with authorities pledging a fair exercise. Provisional showings indicated a jump in support for the PJD, the sole Islamist party in the assembly, with only 14 deputies in the outgoing lower house.

"According to estimates we will be nearer 50 than 40," Mr Benkirane predicted. Mr Benkirane said the PJD would be in the top three, together with Prime Minister Abderrahmane Youssoufi's Socialist Union of Popular Forces (USFP) and government coalition ally, the nationalist Istiqlal party. A total of 26 parties ran in the poll.

Mr Benkirane said the PJD had decided to put up candidates in only 56 of the 91 constituencies "in order to prevent a landslide that would have been impossible for the country to bear both at home and abroad. The Algerian scenario is the phobia of all Moroccans today," he said in a reference to the 1991 landslide victory of the Islamists in Algeria.

The Algerian army cancelled those election results after the Islamists' success, leading to a campaign of violence by armed extremists in Algeria. Interior Minister Driss Jettou said on Friday ballot slips counted so far gave a boost to the PJD. Election officials said voter participation was low, with estimates ranging between 52 and 55 per cent of the 14 million eligible voters, down from 58 percent in the last election in 1997.

King Mohammed, who acceded to the throne in 1999 on the death of his father King Hassan, and Mr Youssoufi's outgoing government said they wanted the vote to be a worthy symbol of Morocco's transition to democracy, that would lay to rest memories of past corruption-marred elections.

One of the first steps the new monarch took in 1999 to help to shed the image of a kingdom tarnished by fraud was to sack then interior minister Driss Basri, considered a tough enforcer of law and order under King Hassan. Voters, including around 6.9 million women who were eligible to cast their ballots, were to pass judgment on five years of the leftist coalition government under Youssoufi, the head of the Socialist Union of Popular Forces (USFP).

Mr Youssoufi, 78, who is not standing for re-election, has claimed some successes, such as cutting the country's external debt from over 19 billion dollars in 1997 to nearly $14 billion in 2001, and helping Morocco along the road to democracy. But his opponents accuse him of failing to tackle unemployment, which has surged above 21 per cent, corruption and the poor state of urban housing.

Moroccan women, largely excluded from politics in the past, are guaranteed 10 per cent of parliamentary seats, thanks to a new electoral code adopted in July. The new voting system provides for a single-round, proportional representation vote which has had the effect of seeing a proliferation of political parties, according to some analysts. - AFP

 


Anti-war Britons slam Bush and Blair

Khaleej Times, 9/29/02

LONDON - Waving anti-war banners and chanting slogans against "Bomber Bush and Bomber Blair", tens of thousands of Britons joined a big peace rally in London to oppose a military strike on Iraq.

Joint organisers Stop the War Coalition and the Muslim Association of Britain estimated at least 100,000 people had joined the march from the River Thames near parliament to Hyde Park in the heart of the British capital. A number of groups and individuals backed the march -- from "rebel" members of the ruling Labour Party and the mayor of London, to trade unions, religious leaders, artists, pop stars, intellectuals, rights activists and Gulf War veterans.

"Our message to the US and British governments is that they would be very foolish to defy a coalition of this breadth and diversity. Just sticking a UN fig leaf on this does not make it any more humane," Stop the War spokesman Mike Marqusee told Reuters at the start of the march soon after midday.

Not surprisingly, protesters directed their wrath at US President George W Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair, America's closest ally in the build-up of pressure on Iraq. Washington and London are trying to get through the UN Security Council a tough resolution which would give Iraq less than six weeks to disclose any weapons of mass destruction and hold the threat of military action over its head.

"Bomber Bush, Bomber Blair, we'll resist you everywhere!" chanted British students at Saturday's march. "Hopefully our leaders will see the huge feeling against the war," said Anne Gleeson, a school catering assistant marching with her husband and two children. All wore Palestinian scarves. The demonstrators were rallying under two main slogans - "Don't Attack Iraq" and "Freedom for Palestine". Police said 40,000 people had assembled by early afternoon, but organisers put the figure at more than 100,000 and said that could double.

Ismail Adam Patel, head of the Muslim group Friends Of Al'Aqsa, said the two issues were inextricable. "Until we solve the Palestine issue, we are not going to get any peace in the Middle East. Why are we going after Iraq when Israel has far more weapons of mass destruction?" he told Reuters at the march.

Thousands of Muslims, from Britain's 2.5 million-strong Islamic community, joined Saturday's march. Many protesters brought children with them. Some Church of England ministers were also dotted among the demonstrators. - Reuters

 


Syria and UAE 'against attack on any Arab nation'
Damascus |WAM | Gulf News, 28-09-2002

Syria and the UAE oppose aggression against any Arab country, a senior Syrian minister said yesterday.

"Damascus and Abu Dhabi are against aggression against any Arab country out of principles of common security and destiny," Syrian Information Minister Adnan Omran said in an interview to WAM on the eve of the visit to Damascus today by UAE Minister of Information and Culture Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan.

He said the two countries "are always cooperating to rebuild Arab solidarity in order to address daunting challenges facing the Arab nations in the current circumstances."

Omran said the visit, during which Aheikh Abdullah will hold talks with Syrian President Bashar Al Assad, would put additional block on the longstanding and developing bilateral ties.

The visit offers an excellent opportunity to discuss a host of issues of mutual concern as well as efforts being exerted by the joint UAE-Syria higher committee to strengthen bilateral relations.

UAE Ambassador to Syria Ali Saif highlighted the strong bilateral ties, whose foundation were laid by President His Highness Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan and his Syrian counterpart Bashar Al Assad.

"Strong joint co-operation has not only served the two countries' interests but also those of Arab nations," he said, noting that they share identical positions towards defending Arab rights.

"The UAE backs Syria's just demands for full withdrawal of Israeli troops from the Golan Heights to the border of June 4, 1967," he stressed.

Syria and the UAE, he added, had signed a number of agreements to boost joint trade, economic, industrial, agricultural and judicial cooperation.


U.S. lawmakers on Iraq assessment trip
Baghdad |Reuters | Gulf News, 28-09-2002

Three U.S. congressmen arrived in Iraq yesterday to assess the humanitarian situation after a decade of sanctions and urge Baghdad to give weapons inspectors unfettered access to avoid war.

"We came over here because we do not want war. We want to see what the circumstances are for the Iraqi people and to see what the consequences of another war might be," Washington Democratic Representative Jim McDermott told reporters at Saddam airport in Baghdad.

McDermott was accompanied by his Democratic colleagues, David Bonior of Michigan and Mike Thompson of California.

"Our desire is that Mr (Saddam) Hussain allow unfettered inspections, we do not want any question about that because we want this to be peacefully and diplomatically resolved," McDermott added.

Iraqi President Saddam Hussain, under intense world diplomatic pressure backed by the threat of U.S. military action, agreed last week to allow UN weapons inspectors back without conditions after an absence of nearly four years.

The United States, whose declared policy is to seek the Iraqi leader's removal, treated the move with disdain, saying Saddam could not be trusted, and vowed to work for a tough new UN resolution on Iraq.

UN inspectors were imposed on Iraq after a U.S.-led coalition ejected Baghdad's invasion forces from Kuwait during the 1991 Gulf War.

The inspectors, saying their work was being obstructed by Iraq, left in December 1998 on the eve of a U.S. and British bombing campaign and have not been allowed since.

McDermott said the United States should try to defuse the crisis with Iraq through diplomatic and peaceful channels.

"We want every diplomatic effort made to resolve this without war. We have no interest in having war," McDermott said.

"We want our administration to pursue every avenue before. War has to be the last option and the United States, I think our opinion is, we do not think it should make the first strike ever," he added.

Iraq has been under crippling UN sanctions for more than a decade. The United States and Iraq severed relations shortly before Washington led a coalition of forces that drove Iraqi forces out of Kuwait.

He said the U.S. State Department knew about their visit to Iraq. "We talked to the State Department before we came and we have the necessary document. So we are perfectly within our rights."

Asked if they were invited by the Iraqi government, McDermott said: "No. Organisations in the United States, the Church Council in Seattle, and the Life Foundation in Michigan are non-profit groups that wanted us to come over and look at the humanitarian situation here in Iraq," he said.

The visit was the second in several years by U.S. lawmakers. U.S. Representative Nick Rahall, a West Virginia Democrat, visited Baghdad on September 14 in a bid to avert a second devastating Gulf conflict.

Congressional leaders circulated a draft resolution on Thursday that authorises the use of military force against Iraq, if the White House determined further diplomatic efforts would not adequately protect the United States from threats posed by Baghdad.

Senate Republicans emerged from a closed caucus voicing strong backing for the proposal, but Senate Democrats said they wanted changes to more strictly define President George W. Bush's powers to launch a military strike on Iraq.

A number of Senate Democrats have said they may propose amendments or alternative resolutions to ensure that Bush waited for the United Nations to work to enforce its resolutions before authorising a U.S. military strike.

In the House a group of moderate Democrats are pushing for language calling for another attempt at stronger, coercive weapons inspections in Iraq.

Other Democrats are opposed to a potential war, saying Bush has not shown an imminent threat that justifies a first strike.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent Al-Jazeerah's.