Military chiefs uneasy about strike on Iraq

Arabic

 الجزيرة

Articles

Cartoons

Casualties

Commentaries

Documents

Editorials

Essays 

Islam

Letters

Media Watch

Mission 

News 

Photos

Poetry

Women in news

 

 

By Barbara Ferguson, Arab News Correspondent

LONDON/WASHINGTON, 31 July — A US-led invasion of Iraq would destabilize the Middle East, Arab League chief Amr Moussa warned yesterday amid reports of growing unease among US and British military chiefs over any such offensive.

Britain’s Guardian newspaper said that military chiefs on both sides of the Atlantic were expressing deep unease at American President Bush’s bellicose statements about Iraq. On Monday the president spoke of his determination to crush threats posed by the “world’s worst leaders.”

According to various reports, US contingency plans range from heavy airstrikes with a small invasion force of 5,000 troops to a massive ground force of 250,000 US troops supported by a 25,000-strong British force.

A British military source told the Guardian that all the options were “high risk”. Gen. Michael Rose, a former head of Britain’s elite Special Air Service, whose troops are trained to operate behind enemy lines, also voiced concerns.

In an article in London’s Evening Standard under the heading “The madness of going to war with Iraq”, Rose said: “There are huge political and military risks associated with launching large-scale ground forces into Iraq.”

A former chief of Britain’s defense staff, Field Marshal Lord Bramall, warned in a letter to The Times that an invasion of Iraq would pour “petrol rather than water” on the situation and boost recruitment for Al-Qaeda, the group suspected of being behind the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States.

In the United States, the Washington Post reported that many senior officers believed Saddam posed no immediate threat and advocated continuing the policy of containment rather than invading Iraq, which carried too many risks.

They also questioned the Bush administration’s determination to topple Saddam as part of its “war on terror”.

Moussa said: “It would threaten the whole stability in the Middle East, which is already under constant threat by the continuation, the aggravation of the Arab-Israeli or Palestinian-Israeli issues.” Moussa, a leading voice in the Arab world, was speaking to BBC radio.

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said yesterday that air strikes alone would not stop Iraq from developing chemical, biological or nuclear weapons. He also said Iraq has “benefited from Americans spies” that provide insider information on US military tactics.

“The Iraqis have a great deal of what they do deeply buried,” Rumsfeld said at the US Joint Forces Command headquarters in Suffolk, Virginia, referring to buried and mobile sites for weapons of mass destruction the US believes Iraq has developed.

“A biological laboratory can be on wheels in a trailer and make a lot of bad stuff, and it’s moveable. And it looks like most any other trailer,” he said.

Rumsfeld then quietly dropped a bombshell by saying that American spies were helping the Iraqis. A Pentagon spokesman was unable to clarify Rumsfeld’s remarks, but did say the secretary was speaking about past, not current, US spies.