|
Readers' Letters, June 15, 2003, Al-Jazeerah.info |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Human Price of the Israeli Occupation of Palestine Israeli daily aggression on the Palestinian people Mission and meaning of Al-Jazeerah Cities, localities, and tourist attractions
|
Dear editor, Were the Jews denied access to the Wailing Wall during the period when Jerusalem was under Jordanian control? I wrote a piece in Counterpunch (www.counterpunch.org) on June 12 (The Tragic Legacy of the Six Day War), which prompted a Jewish reader to ask me this question. A friend of mine in the Bay Area tells me that he visited Masjid al-Aqsa in April 1967 and he saw Jews worshipping at the Wall, but others tell me that the Jews were denied access. If the Jews were denied access, why was that the case? Ahmad Faruqui
Editor: When Israel was declared on May 14/15, 1948, the Israeli Army, the Haganah, was already in full war against the Palestinian people to evict them from their villages and towns. Neighboring Arab states entered Palestine in an attempt to stop the eviction of refugees. They were defeated. By the end of the war, Israel had annexed much more territories that the 1947 Partition Resolution allowed. In particular, it annexed the Galilee, Auja area, and large parts of the West Bank and Gaza territories. These were supposed to be the territories of the Arab state of Palestine (See the map in the Documents section). The 1948 war resulted in hostility between Israel and its neighboring Arab states because of the eviction of refugees and preventing them from going back to their villages and towns after the war, because of annexing the Palestinian Arab territories to Israel, and because the Arab state of Palestine was not established. The UN mediated between Israel and its neighboring Arab states during talks held in Rhodes, Greece, in 1949. These talks resulted in signing armistice agreements between Israel and each of Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, and Egypt. The agreements were mainly about identifying the de facto borders after the war. However, these were considered truce (Hudna) borders. This meant that they were not accepted permanently by Arabs. In a way, these were not peace agreements or treaties. That is why Arab states did not recognize Israel's existence or its borders. Despite that, there was some sort of communication between Israel and its neighboring Arab states, particularly through the UN and its agency known as UNRWA, which served as a relief and works agency for Palestine refugees. Some employees of the agency crossed the borders regularly. Jordan in particular promised to allow a limited
number of Jewish worshippers, probably around 30 people every time, to
cross from West Jerusalem to East Jerusalem for prayers at the Whaling
Wall. I'm not sure about the regulariy and frequency of the occurances.
But they were arranged with great care and without arousing any attention
from Palestinians or Arabs and Muslims at large because the two countries
were still at an official state of war. So, you can say that some
Jews were allowed to pray there even during these dangerous times.
I am very pleased to see the
publication of your site in English and just read your mission
statement and wish you all the best of good fortune in realising it. I
recommend that you try to publicise this mission statement somehow in
the internet and mainstream media and hope that you can fulfil it. Ever
since the 2000 US election I have turned to European media for news
coverage and also frequently went to your previous Al-Jazeerah
site during the recent insanity in Iraq since again, regional coverage
on this side of 'the pond' was so universally biased and inept. Bias is
perhaps inevitable, especially during a time of confusion and conflict,
but the overall ineptitude, i.e. inability to explain or research the
facts of what is going on, points to a far deeper problem, namely that
our democracies exists mainly as such only in name, not function, so
that much of our society, and therefore its foreign policies and so on,
our based on myths and lies, that in too many cases the perpetrators
themselves believe as truth, and in many other cases are the result of
deliberate manipulation. Any news organisation such as yourself that
tries to present what is actually going on is of great service to this
troubled and marvellous world we all share. As long as the vision and
mission are sincerely held in your hearts, tehn outer success or failure
are irrelevant and you will be achieving victory.
Again, I say: 'GOOD LUCK!!"
Yours,
Ashley Howes,
Cape Breton, Canada
Sharon and his neo-con cabal backers
In a fit of instant reaction, US
President George W. Bush, might have come down heavily on Ariel Sharon's
outrageous move to sanction extra-judicial killing of Hamas leader Abdel
Aziz Rantissi even as Bush has been claiming a big victory in Aqaba as a
milestone on his roadway to peace, but it made no difference to Sharon.
Sharon was still in full command of the US-Israel 'partnership'
and went ahead to take care of 'Israel's security needs' by sending in
helicopter gunships into Gaza and Occupied West bank, to take out as
many Hamas operatives as possible, in a preemptive series of planned
murder attacks. The death tally for Palestinians has to match the
Israeli casualties on that Bus blast on Jaffa Road, as demanded by an
eye for an eye justice. The peace can take its own time. Israel is not
in a hurry. They have waited 2000 years. A similar parallel is visible back in the States itself. Though the neo-con cabal has been fully exposed in media and each and every member is identified by the investigative media; for the neo-com, it is business as usual. Hardly a day passes, when protests against the hijacking of the US Presidency, by a group of highly manipulative Jewish- American activists is not registered in the media. The cabal is in full command of its sanctified agenda to usher is a New American Century --- democracy in the US be damned as a luxury the opportunists can not allow the people of the US to enjoy. Chief instrument of the execution of all such fascist agenda is American Enterprise Institute. President Bush and other officials are forced to appear at its meetings, to give out a signal of legitimacy to a wholly undemocratic power center. Last night, BBC's Hard Talk anchor Tim Sebastian was in DVC (digital video conference) contact with Ms. Danielle Pletka, Vice President for Foreign and Defence Policy Studies at the American Enterprise Institute, who kept a robust defence of US stand on Iraq's dubious 'liberation' and vexed eloquent on how the reconstruction of Iraq is the main priority, though the other participant of the debate British MP Jeffery kept on the characterizing of US move on Iraq as nothing but a new phase of colonialism. Ms. Pletka simply ignored the 'accusation' and kept up her refrain, that Iraq will be reconstructed, by its own people apparently as chosen by the US, and through own resources, apparently as appropriated by the US. The ! best part was, that she was taking all the snipes by the British MP, with full display of her very expansive smile, to which the MP rightly objected. This was not a matter to be smiled about. A whole nation and its people are being enslaved; probably the first in a series of other weak states with huge resources. India should take note and brace itself for a sinister trap to be once again colonise India, as the 'jewel in the crown' of the US President. The blame will go down in history on that ambitious Hindutva extremist, L. K. Advani, who had been the behind the scene supporter of the neo-con cabal. Indian people should not forget they are part of a 'living history' that will be taught in class-rooms when their progeny will once again rise to thwart a second colonial power, and that battle may last longer than the 62 years history of Indian National Congress independence campaign. GHULAM MUHAMMED, MUMBAI, INDIA
American
multi-nation negotiation request revealed as North Korean Ambush Tokyo
– Sources within the Japanese parliament have confirmed US intentions
to sandbag North Korea’s development of nuclear deterrents using
backdoor politics at the proposed meeting between North and South Korea,
Japan and the United States.
The plan stipulates the realization of the proposed
multi-national talks to be chaired by US representation where a majority
vote process would be implemented to ensure the ceasing of any future
nuclear activities within North Korea.
Confirmed discussions between American and Japanese delegates
concerning the developmental status of North Korean nuclear Arms
resulted in a heated dialog in which the Japanese spokesperson strongly
disagreed with the American proposal to obtain a unanimous resolution
for pre-emptive strike authorization based on North Korea reaching
specific benchmarks in their nuclear development program at the proposed
talks.
When questioned about his reaction, the Japanese representative
replied, “The benchmarks cited by the US representative have already
been achieved. We are not prepared to support any US-proposed initiative
which would likely result in devastating consequences for both South
Korea and Japan.” Andrew Maclaren
US threatens to boycott Belgium over war crimes law Ian Black in Brussels and Ewen MacAskill The Guardian Friday, June 13, 2003 http://www.guardian.co.uk/nato/story/0,12667,976499,00.html
IOL Unveils Threads Of Iraqi Resistance By Ali Halni, IOL Baghdad Correspondent Islam Online June 12, 2003 http://www.islam-online.net/English/News/2003-06/12/article13.shtml
Sent by HRIP International
|
|
|
Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent Al-Jazeerah's. editor@aljazeerah.info |